FHII said:
Of course not. But referring to faith as a work -- while not really wrong because 2 or 3 times the Bible does tell us to do the work of faith -- is a contradition. Here's why:
1. Paul so often voiced his objection to faith and works mixing. He said we are saved by grace through faith and not of works. He said that faith and works don't mix. They frustrate each other. He's clearly using the terms as opposites.
2. James (the author of the Epistle of James) is absolultely 100% when he says faith without works is dead! UNLESS he was talking about the "good works" I referred to. You, Ernest, also referred to it... But in a much smaller reference, because helping the brethren isn't the only "good work" (or maybe that's not really a good work.... Not really sure what your stance is on that....). The problem is that I'm not so sure James was speaking spiritually like Paul was.
3. The TRUTH of the matter is that faith itself must be renewed day by day. This is what Jesus meant when he taught the desciples to pray, "Give us this day our daily bread". Unless of course, you are worried about not having your toast in the morning.
Overall, if you want to call "faith" a "work" fine.... But why? Paul didn't. Yes I know he said "the work of faith" a few times (not that often). But he was clearly against works mixing with grace. But why the agenda of pushing it as a work? Why the agenda of contradicting Paul in words? Why not simply say, "folks... Grace comes through faith and not works. There's a few things and points to faith and it does take some effort (your life, really)!"
So why try to force faith and works to coexist?
LOL!!! Yea.... Good question!
Duly noted. Never said you did. However, I suspect it. Maybe not from you, but it'll come up eventually. If not from you, someone else.
Nowhere did Paul ever divorce faith from NT obedience, see Rom 6. When Paul speaks of faith apart from works as in Rom 4:4,5, the works under consideration are works of merit the "worker" in v4 does not an obedient faith as Abraham. An obedient, working faith saves, works of merit do not. In other places Paul speaks of woks of the OT law. WOrks of the OT law do not jsutify but an obeident faith to Christ's NT gospel does justifiy.
When Paul said works do not justify and James said works do jsutify, theyare not contradicting each other for they are not talking about the same kind of works. Again, Paul is speaking of works of merit whereas James is speaking of obedient works as Abraham had in offereing Isaac.
Paul is essentially saying works without faith does not justify and James is saying faith without works does not justify
Paul's Roman epistle begins with "
for obedience to the faith" Rom 1:5 and ends with "
for the obedience of faith" Rom 16:26
Secondhand Lion said:
Ernest,
I am back after a very busy day at work and you have been on my thoughts and prayers quite a bit. (Yes, you have been living rent free in my head for a few hours :) ) I need to ask you a couple questions which will determine whether I continue this conversation or not.
1. Are you willing to have an honest discussion with the option of changing your mind or are you completely opposed to changing your mind?
2. Are you willing to at least try to be reasonable?
So far I have just tried to use general bible principle with you, but I am prepared to go verse for verse with you in explanation. I have been discussing this for years and it is a great burden of mine. These posts will get extremely long. I would prefer to do this in person and will gladly tell you where I am if you would like to see if that is a possibility. You know I am in Maryland...any chance? We could sit down with our bibles and try to hash out what God has for us.
There have already been a couple points of contradiction in your position. (i.e. Romans 2 being only for "groups" in another thread and now individuals) We can hash all this out on here or in person.
If you would rather not or can not acknowledge the possibility that you could possibly be wrong...we don't need to bother.
Before you ask...yes there is a possibility I could be wrong, but it would not be my belief if I thought I was, I am never afraid to hear opposing viewpoints.
SL
I always approach forums with an open mind but I'm not open to obvious errors.
Are YOU willing to be reasonable? Do you accept Eph 2:10 or deny it and want to change it?
Your argument, as some others, has been about "the finished work of Christ" being sufficient which I have answered numerous times without getting the first response back on it.
The work Christ did is suffient enough to saved every man, Heb 2:9, so why isn't every man saved? For every man wil not
obey Christ, Heb 5:9. So you argument fails you here.
You were also wrong in Romans chapters 1-3 where Paul is clearly talking about the two groups, Jew and Gentile. You never gave one iota of proof otherwise. Here is your chance again, what
particular individual is Paul talking about in romans 1-3 if he is not talking about those two groups, Jew and Gentile? Who is that mystery individual Paul is speaking about Romans chapters 1-3?
7angels said:
Ernest T. Bass
it sounds to me like what is being argued over is righteousness and not salvation. rom 10:9 tells us:
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
this is all that is required to be saved. but in order to achieve righteousness then we are talking about a whole different can of worms(or talking about something else entirely different).
yes, you do need faith and works to be saved because according to rom 10:9 the works part is speaking out your mouth and the faith part is believing in your heart. just as the bible says faith without works is dead.
Ernest T. Bass says Accepting salvation is a work, again, one must have faith to be saved and faith is a work.
faith is not a work but a belief. according to rom 10:17 So then faith
cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. if faith was works then the verse would read
So then works cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. if this were true then we would not need to go out into all the world to preach the Gospel because works is just hearing and listening to the word of God(this is unscriptural so works cannot be faith).
God bless
I agree, believing and confessing with the mouth are works, and if those works are not done one cannot be saved...[unless someone is willing to ague the unbelieving denier of Christ can be saved]
The bible does tie faith and works so closely together that faith is a work, one cannot have a faith if he has no works. A point James makes in James Chpat 2 is that if you hav no works then you cannot even prove you have faith.
1 Thess 1:3 and Gal 5:6 both speak of a working faith.
In Mark 2:1-5 Jesus is in a crowed house and watches as men remove part of the roof and lower a sick man down to Him on a bed. Verse 5 then says "
When Jesus saw their faith..." What is it that Jesus saw that is called faith?
WORKS....the
works is called faith.
From Eph 2:8 we are told the Ephesians were saved by faith. 1 Pet 3:21 we are told baptism saves. SInce there is jsut one way to be sved, then:
Eph 2:8----faith>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>saves
1Pet3:21--baptism>>>>>>>>>>>>saves
So a saving faith must include the work of submitting to water baptism. We are told that repentance saves (not perish), Lk 13:3,5 and confession saves, Rom 10:9,10 so a saving faith must then also include repentance and confession.
Comparing ACts 2:41 with verse 44, those that were "baptized" in v41 are the ones who "believed" in v44 so we have 'believed" in v44 include being baptized.
Rom 10:13-17 one cannot believe what he has not heard about, so hearing may lead to an obedient belief that calls upon the name of the Lord.