No you gave more theories and opinions, no hard facts
Dont demand hard facts when you base your beliefs around faith. That is contradictory.I provided various theories of physics which are based on hard math. Math you cannot refute unless you understand the math and have a PHD in physics, which I am betting you do not.I have also used logic to display why the "something comes from nothing" approach if flawed, both scientifically speaking and logically speaking.
We are all part of God, but not in the way you would like us to explain it.
Elaborate please.
Not at all, you are trying to limit God with your flawed perspective.
I have a creeping suspicion you werent aware of monism or non-dualism until I brought it up in this thread, so assuming that you arent aware of either philosophy, how would you know that my perspective is flawed?And assuming you are aware of the various philosophical theories (my apologies), then please elaborate on how Christian theology is monotheistic and not monistic or non-dualist.
Hold on this is mans limited understanding and not Gods view of infinity. Man makes up these stupid limits to make himself feel superior, once again proving God right.
What?I am not claiming anything about any God being superior or inferior. I am claiming that we communicate through langauge, terms and words in languages have definitions, and those definitions do not change on whim unless society by-large starts to use the word in a different way.The definition of infinity, per the rules of the english language, means no boundaries. Something with no boundaries exists everywhere, as everything. There is nothing that isnt it, since it is infinite.If you do not like these "limits" of language, then please stop using language to communicate with me. Perhaps you can regress to tribal clicks and pops.
Nope wrong again. You still show your lack of understanding of God. If you have truly studied the Gods of Hinduism and the Greek philosophers then you will realize they were far too human to be infinate.
Again, you demonstrate the habit or arguing against something you arent familiar with. Could a three year old provide a cohesive argument against string theory? Could a physicist who has never picked up a brush teach a class on painting?The answer is no.I didnt state "Hindu mythology" or "Greek mythology". I stated "Hindu philosphy" and "Greek philosophy". What the populace practiced (henotheism/polytheism) and what the philosophers believed were two very different things.How much Plato and Aristotle have you read? Have you read the Upanishads?If you havent, you are in no position to argue against them.
HOW? You are imposing alot of opinions without basis here. You really need to approach God from His perspective and stop trying to limit Him with yours.
They have basis in logic, science, math, and philosophy.Your opinions have basis in faith, and faith has no basis in reality, that is why it is called faith.The Greek populace had faith in Zeus, the Hindus in Ganesh, the Muslims in Allah, the Jews in Yaweh, the Christians in Jesus, the Zoroastrians in Ahura Mazda.In the end, all faiths are equal. And there is nothing wrong with faith. But it is not subsitute for science, logic, or math.