No. You are quick to judge here.
My ‘judgment’ of any church that is part of Christendom is the result of a lot of research and study. I was born and raised in Christendom, so I know what I have left behind.
There are foundational beliefs found in Christendom’s churches that are also found in all false religion. If any church holds to any or all of these beliefs, I will reject them outright.
These are...
1) Belief in more than one god, even forcing three gods into one entity.
2) Belief in an immortal soul that departs from the body in a conscious state after death.
3) The destination of those souls either to a heavenly bliss or a fiery hell.
None of these beliefs are biblical.
Any thing I would consider a miracle, which I have experienced or seen, usually has been outside of any church, through out my life. That is with me growing up in a Brethern church until my mid 20's, then attending my last church, the Baptist one, for most of my time until recently. The current church which I'm attending, though Pentecostal, I have never seen anyone fall down. I've been to this church in the past, on and off as well. The only thing I did witness is there are people at times who speak in tongues, during prayer, during special events. However, its usually just a few people. My view on tongues is that, when those in the early church spoke it, someone was around to interpret it. I also view that any gifts God gives a person, is not for self edification, however, it is to benefit others and glorify God.
1 Cor 14:27-28...
“And if someone speaks in a tongue, let it be limited to two or three at the most, and in turns, and someone must interpret. 28 But if there is no interpreter, he must keep silent in the congregation and speak to himself and to God.”
So, yes, you are correct...if any in the first century spoke in tongues, an interpreter had to be present or the person was to remain silent. What is the point of speaking a foreign language if no one knows what you are saying?
1 Cor 13:1-2...
“If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels but do not have love, I have become a clanging gong or a clashing cymbal. 2 And if I have the gift of prophecy and understand all the sacred secrets and all knowledge, and if I have all the faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.”
As Paul always stressed love among his brethren, if that love was missing, then the gifts were meaningless.
The other aspect of speaking in foreign tongues was the fact that the disciples who received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, spoke the languages of foreign visitors who had come to Jerusalem for the festival. They were hearing the gospel message in their own languages. There was a purpose to it. It was not just unintelligible gibberish.
1 Cor 14:33 says...
”For God is a God not of disorder but of peace.”
Now put that in a modern context....
In the first century there was
“one Lord, one faith, one baptism”...but at present there are literally thousands of different sects and denominations all claiming to teach Christian truth. Whom should we believe?
What is the evidence of one’s commitment to Christ’s teachings so that there are no excuses offered to ignore them, or for personal opinion to override some clearly stated positions. (Matt 7:21-23)
Genuine Christians are
“no part of the world”....(John 18:36)....no part of its corrupt rulership, it’s greedy commercialism or its disgusting immorality.
Since 1 John 5:19 tells us that
“the whole world lies in the power of the wicked one”, what part of “the world” is exempt?
How did Jesus demonstrate that he was “no part of the world” back then?
He purposely ignored the fact that his people were oppressed by the Roman rulers of the day and stayed away from any political involvement. Some among his nation were planning a revolt against the Romans and these were mentioned on one occasion involving Paul’s arrest. (Acts 21:37-38)
First-century historian Flavius Josephus describes these as “Sicarii” (dagger men) a band of fanatic Jewish patriots, unrelenting enemies of Rome, who engaged in organized political killings.....So there can be no patriotic Christians who will take up arms to kill the enemies of their nation, because we are commanded by Christ to
“love your enemies” (Matt 5:43-44) If we would take up arms and kill our enemies, we might find that there are Christians of the same brotherhood on the opposing side. Whose side then would God take? (1 John 4:20-21) True Christians would not be there in the first place...not found in the military even training to kill their fellow man. (Rom 12:17-21)
Jesus did not chase wealth or power even though he was the son of the highest power in existence. He was born and raised in modest circumstances. And he did not advocate violence or bloodshed of any kind. He walked peacefully among sinners and offered them a better way of life because Christianity was not something you do on Sunday (which never was a Sabbath)...it was a commitment to live as Christ lived 24/7. It’s a life that brings peace, so we are to distance ourselves from the war-mongers.
How do you feel about such things?