Just because I didn’t mention every aspect of the Assyrian no way implies I missed anything. I know some like to write college dissertations as posts on the forum.
But it seems to be clear in places like Isaiah that the reference to the future Antichrist is as “ the Assyrian”. And it seems to be clear that Satan will I dwell this guy, so “the Assyrian” referring to Satan is valid.
My undeclared point of course was, that one must be careful with some Scriptures about "the Assyrian", like that Isaiah 30 Scripture I posted, because it is not about the flesh king of Assyria of history. It is about Satan himself, with God only using the 'Assyrian' title to point to Satan. God did the same thing in Isaiah 14 with pointing to Satan using the titles of Pharaoh and the Assyrian. And He did it again in Ezekiel 28 with using the titles of the king and prince of Tyrus, and yet again in Ezekiel 31 with the Assyrian again.
Thus how does one really know the coming Antichrist has to be a flesh man, and not Satan himself? It is just as much an assumption that the coming "man of sin" will be a flesh man as it can be that he will be Satan himself. When the Revelation 11 through 13 Scripture about that false one is weighed along with the Matthew 24:23-26 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 events, it points more it being about Satan himself coming here on earth, than it does some flesh man just possessed by Satan.