I agree. The Uniformitarianism of science assumes constants, constant rates of decay, constant rates of erosion etc, in so doing they ignore the anomaly and the catastrophe. This also goes for other constants such as light speed.... When God said let there be light, there was light, instantaneously, this presumes that light speed has been decelerating since creation, Quickly at first, to where it is now, nearly at a constant.... a deceleration curve. Understanding this nullifies millions of light years for the age of the earth. (see link, Note this is a secular source)
Theory that challenges Einstein's physics could soon be put to the test
I Agree with you on Peleg as well and have noted that as well. Very few have seen this.
What all this does is throw into question the expected life of our sun (The sun shall not give its light) Which would result in the darkening of the moon as well, as per the sixth seal. When People start to see these things come to fruition, We will then see the "distress of nations", and "men's hearts failing them for fear" (Luke 21:23-24).... it is going to get to the point where you cannot explain it away with science, Even the "four pillars" of the that hold up the earth will be shaken... these are the four bonds that hold all matter together
The 4 Fundamental Forces of Physics (thoughtco.com), As the "powers of heaven shall be shaken".
The four pillars
I had a small introduction to astrophysics while in university and was taught that stars "evolve" from one type to another as the concentration of elemental nuclei increase in a well described fusion of Hydrogen into Helium and then heavier more stable nuclei. I don't recollect how neutrons or electrons are supposed to be created, but the point is that the sun is supposed to change composition very gradually with consequent expansion of its diameter, a reduction in light emission, and an emission frequency shift to the red. Later changes are supposed to be an increased density of the solar core, consequent increase in gravitational flux, reduction in solar diameter, and slowing of the internal nuclear reactions as the core approaches the most stable nuclear configuration, that of iron.
According to the theory, our sun is supposed to be relatively young as determined by emission spectra, but emission spectra doesn't reveal elemental concentrations. My recollection of material I studied over 40 years ago is a bit suspect, but as I recall, the fusion cycles in the sun's core are supposed to change relatively abruptly and could theoretically cause relatively quick changes in solar emission intensity and frequency.
That said, cosmological theory, stellar genesis, theoretically requires very long periods of time, so "quick" transitions would still be lengthy to us.
One problem with the theory of solar elemental Genesis, as it was taught to me, was that iron should be the most common element in the universe, yet hydrogen appears to remain the most abundant. That problem is resolved by the assumption that the known universe is relatively young at around 9 billion years. My mind is unable to accept the concept of a young universe that is billions of years old, but that's what evolutionary theory requires. The very use of the word "evolution " to describe solar Genesis should be enough to make a person wary of the theory as it has absolutely nothing to do with Darwinian evolutionary theory other than allowing a very long period of time for random chance to accomplish what God did in 6 days.
My point though is that our understanding of nuclear physics and gravitational forces tells us that stars, including the sun, must be in a process of nuclear changes, some of which are quite sudden (as in the collapse of a star to become a nova or supernova.)
What the media doesn't tell us, what schools don't bother to teach kids, is that our planetary probes, our science, is telling us that the other planets in our solar system are warming up. It's not just our Earth, and the only possible explanation is either orbital changes or an increase in solar radiation at the lower end of the spectrum.
I don't know what kind of data was being collected by our latest solar probes, but the dynamics of the field interactions of plasmas in solar convective cells isn't fully understood or what role they play in solar metamorphosis, and some people are concerned.