Christophany, Taken, Eternally Grateful, justbyfaith, and Enoch are all denizens of an uneducated Fundamentalist Ghetto that outlaws academic commentaries on specific NT books (e. g. on Revelation and Hebrews), all of which support my anti-OSAS stance. Notice carefully that they all duck my specific exegetic arguments and verses cited in support because they have nothing relevant to say. Here is my challenge to them: "Season your penchant for pontificating bluster with a modicum of intellectual rigor. Take a brief walk outside your myopic and sheltered Fundamentalist Ghetto, enter the big bad world of modern biblical scholarship, and, at last, breathe the fresh air of honest and open inquiry!
Taken: "How CAN a Christian "Conquer"?
Problem....WHAT is a Christian?"
Revelation's answer: A Christian is a believer whose name has not been blotted out of the Book of Life. The perseverance in faithfulness required by Jesus in Revelation establishes the possibility of erasure of one's name from the Book of Life and therefore the possibility of losing one's salvation. OSAS junkies have no answer for this!
Eternally Grateful: "So God need you to help him save you?"
Yes, God needs our free choice to be faithful to Him. The Greek word for "faith" also means "faithfulness," so that we are saved by our way of being, not by getting our ticket punched to Heaven, regardless of how we live. OSAS advocates cheapen and debase God's grace.
Eternally Grateful: "I love when people slam eternal security, they basically make eternal life conditional and remove God out of the picture."
Of course salvation is conditional. God removes Himself from the picture, when we misuse our free will to choose or reject Him!
Eternally Grateful: "Listen to what you said you have eternal life as long as you abide and you obey
your trying to earn a reward not receive a gift"
You don't understand God's grace. Faithful living is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for salvation but in no way merits salvation.
Enoch: "Any teaching opposing the eternal security of believers is heresy and also TOTAL NONSENSE. Salvation without eternal security means no salvation."
Duh, learn to think! Those who "work out their own salvation with fear and trembling (Phil. 2:12)" are ultimately saved!
Christophany: "it makes all Gods promises on eternal life out to be a lie."
No it makes your false understanding of all God's promises of eternal life a lie.
If one takes a gnostic view, we are perfect spirit with a fallen flesh, they have a vessel where they can have salvation locked in without boundaries or responsibilities which can be failed.
What I do not understand is how they can cope with all the parables of believers who fail to stay faithful or loyal to God and get cast out and put with the sinners. They create an addition not in the story that these were only false believers. Some go as far as to say one is saved by faith without fruit, or no external sign and this is a valid experience except Paul emphasis exactly the opposite. My conclusion was a different faith has arisen within christianity which redefines all the words and meaning to meet their own theology without reference to its obvious meaning.
That was fine for me, until any believer who did not agree with them was an anti Christ, worse than a murderer etc. Some suggested faithful believers should be expelled from churches etc. It is ironic these sentiments are heretical and traditionally rejected, yet they will use any technique and approach to assert only their view and if you have another you are deluded, evil and to be resisted. There theology and view works well in a wealthy middle class society where the difference between believers and sinners is difficult to see. But in a poor society or ridiculously rich society the differences become obvious because sinners have no reason to hide their true nature or show any restraint.