AD,
I would add that I can't support,
1. Unconditional election because believers are 'elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father' (1 Pet 1:2).
2. Limited atonement is refuted by several Scriptures:
Passages Supporting Universal Atonement
Universal (or unlimited) atonement is supported throughout the New Testament. John 3:16–17 says that “God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son. . . . God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.” The Greek word
kosmos, translated “the world,” covers the inhabitants of the entire earth. Other verses supporting unlimited atonement include John 1:29, where Jesus is said to take away “the sin of the world”; Romans 11:32, in which God has mercy on “all” the disobedient; and 1 John 2:2, which says Jesus is “the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”
None of these verses contain any kind of limitation, stated or implied, on Christ’s sacrifice. As if saying that Jesus is the atoning sacrifice for the sins of the world was not sufficient, the apostle John specifically included the Greek word
holou, which means “whole, entire, all, complete.” Unless limited atonement is presumed, there is no solid basis for limiting the extent of the atonement mentioned in 1 John 2:2 (Got Questions,
What are the main arguments against limited atonement?)
3. Irresistible grace.
God is not willing that any perish but all be saved: Tit 2:11; 1 Ti 2:4; 2 Pet 3:9.
What's the point of evangelism if believers are unconditionally elected because of limited atonement and irresistible grace? If irresistible grace is biblical, no preacher can preach to a group of unsaved people to repent, seek forgiveness and have faith in Jesus alone. It would be fake preaching to call ALL to repent when ALL cannot come, according to Calvinism.
Oz