We spoke of this already williemac. You keep saying that it's my definition, and you then apply it only to unbelievers. This does NOT only apply to unbelievers, as per verse 22 starts talking about those who are saved. He is speaking to have us draw near, then speaks of us holding fast OUR PROFESSION of faith. This is undoubtedly speaking to the saved. And then he speaks of provoking each other to GOOD WORKS, then speaks of exhorting one another. And then gives an exhortation himself about those who sin willfully after receiving knowledge of the truth. This is not unbelievers, but those who HAVE FAITH. He then compares the punishment to a JEWISH BELIEVER WHO HAD SINNED WILLFULLY AFTER KNOWING THE TRUTH, DESPISING MOSES LAW. He then explains how the punishment will be much sorer for US, THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN SANCTIFIED BY THE BLOOD OF CHRIST, TO TOSS IT AWAY.williemac said:Willful sin? I suppose you have a definition of willful sin. However, I am not interested in YOUR definition of it. The term "sin willfully" is used just one time in scripture. It has a context. The meaning of it is not ours to speculate or contrive. The author of Hebrews used the term and in a context where he was speaking of they who sin outside of the sacrifice of Jesus, through unbelief. Read the last verse in the context, (10:39). We "believe" to the saving of the soul. This lines up with Rom.10:9.
Here is the problem. In regards to they who concur with your suggestion that one can give back eternal life by sinning,,I have observed at least several interpretations from various brothers and sisters as to just what degree of sinning constitutes willful sin. There is no universal agreement on the term's meaning. This indicates that the author did not define it. However, the error is in the conclusion that the author was suggesting that a 'believer' will be judged if he sins willfully. He was not saying any such thing. If he was, then he contradicted the words of Jesus in John 5:24...." Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me HAS EVERLASTING LIFE, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life. " .....unless he sins willfully? Sorry, I don't see that part in His promise.
In Heb.10, the author is speaking of they who reject the sacrifice of Jesus. Therefore there is no longer a sacrifice for them. The old ones have been removed and replaced by His one sacrifice for sin. But John, in 1John 2:1, said that if we sin we have an advocate with the Father, namely Jesus. His sacrifice is a perpetual offering for sin.
In Rev.2:20-22, Jesus refers to those whom He calls "MY SERVANTS", who were being beguiled to commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols. His answer to this was to assure them that they would be chastened with great tribulation (trouble) unless they repented of these. This is how Jesus has chosen to deal with a sinning servant of His. Chastening. I think we should just let Him decide what constitutes the giving back of eternal life.
We received life by grace, through faith. We give it back through the changing of our minds away from faith. The unfortunate thing is that the bible gives an example of this in Galatians. I call it unfortunate because the same example infiltrates the church even today. It is the delusion that we are to add our own obedience into the arena of justification. Therefore, if I can give back justification to life by sinning, then by default, I keep it by not sinning. So the formula for salvation then becomes..."we are justified by faith and not sinning."
Allow me to use the bible terms for this...We would be justified by faith and then afterward, also by the keeping of the law. This is essentially what you are saying, whether you realize it or not.
This doctrine of leaven is being peddled throughout the church and is alive and well on this website. It is not worded so abruptly as I just put it. It is more subtle. I am merely bringing to light what it amounts to.
It amounts to the conclusion that the cross, the sacrifice for sin, applies only to those who don't sin anymore. How absurd!
Now if that, dear Williemac, you do not agree with, then we must agree to disagree. The willfull sinners in this passage are those who are saved already. The definition of willful sin is understood when reading the Scriptures. It is explained in verse 39 as those who "draw back into perdition". These are believers, who have chosen their sins after being saved, and have gone back into sin. A soul who sins, and repents, is not one who draws back into perdition. That is not defined as "willful sin". It is the soul that draws back into sin, and does not repent.
That is not how the formula works, nor is it the conclusion I am drawing towards. Do you know why Paul said that not the hearers of the law are justified but the doers of the law? Because those who do not keep the law are not justified. Never is it said to be something that saves you, throughout the entire Scriptures (which I am certain you agree). But it is something that will inhibit you if you REFUSE to obey. That make sense? Therefore one must simply believe to be saved. THEN they must stay in obedience to keep their salvation. No, obedience was not how they were saved. Initially one must believe, then are they required to do. Their doing, or not doing, then affects their salvation after they are saved. Their not doing will prevent them from entering into the Kingdom.
Faith saves you, but as is stated without works, your faith is DEAD. Meaning completely useless. That salvation you had previously believed you obtained is tossed aside worthless, because you were as the branch that was grafted into the tree, but then bore not good fruit, but evil fruit. And if you bear evil fruit after being grafted in, your faith is null and void. You will be cut off again.