God speaks through all of us, I am sure, including the apostles. He might be trying to get you to teach me something right now, or for me to teach you something.
Ok, this is good. But now, the reason I was asking is because if you acknowledge that God spoke through the apostles, then you at least have to honor the concept that some of what the apostles wrote in scripture is the word of God. And then it becomes a matter of deciphering what things they said were the word of God and what things they said were merely the word of men. This creates as situation where you are essentially rewriting scripture, which is IMO a mistake that leads to and has led in the past to heretical teaching. The Gnostics were terrible about this. "This verse is inspired, this verse is not," and then twist the daylights out even the ones they said were to fit into an occult interpretation and reinvention of what "Christianity" actually was.
I can't condone a Christianity that opens the door to that. For me, either the True and Living God was able to establish through the early church what was truly the word of God or He wasn't. As Paul told the Thessalonians, "We also thank God without ceasing, because when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men but the word of God, as it is in truth."