No, to fulfill Jesus' command via Acts 2:38.Is the church permitted to violate the commandment of Jesus Christ found Matt 28:19?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No, to fulfill Jesus' command via Acts 2:38.Is the church permitted to violate the commandment of Jesus Christ found Matt 28:19?
You trying to tell me Elizabeth Taylor was not trying to pick up on Moses(Heston) after all these years of thinking it happened?
Sorry. I am 60 and the original 10 Commandments(1970 era) with Liz Taylor and Charlton Heston as Moses was in it.Lost the heck out of me Truthr, not grasping your meaning sir.
Baptized in Jesus name is correct.
Baptized in the name of Jesus Christ is correct.
Now for that last example you gave, "name of the Lord" - Your very own Catholic Bible reads...
Acts 10:48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Then they desired him to tarry with them some days.
I explain it here throughly.
No, to fulfill Jesus' command via Acts 2:38.
Acts 2:38, 8, 10 and 19 commanding baptism in the name of Jesus per Matt 28:19 are invalid?meaning as Christ himself said to be baptized which is Matt 28:19
All others are invalid traditions of men
This is babbling?...the gifts of the spirit are:
Wisdom
Understanding
Knowledge
Counsel
Piety
Fear of the lord
Fortitude
not babbling!
To baptize in the name of the son, Jesus.What is his command?
Acts 2:38, 8, 10 and 19 commanding baptism in the name of Jesus per Matt 28:19 are invalid?
This is babbling?...
2 For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.
To baptize in the name of the son, Jesus.
Not son, son.
meaning as Christ himself said to be baptized which is Matt 28:19
All others are invalid traditions of men
You failed to produce scripture whereby they used "Father, Son, Holy Ghost" --- Your hanging unto that formula whereby NOBODY in scripture has baptized using it.
Further, you claim because "Christ himself said" to baptize via Matt 28:19 (which NOBODY in scripture has done), that all other baptisms are invalid --- whew!
Please, look at the scripture everyone has provided for you.
Correct.they refer to Matt 28:19
It is the human spirit speaking to God.If it’s really the spirit then you ain’t involved!
"Jesus" or "son"?no it’s Matt 28:19
19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
Correct.
They knew the name of the son per Matt 28:19 is Jesus.
Most of Christendom is mystified by it.
It is the human spirit speaking to God.
You really haven't read 1 Cor 14?