I did not pick and choose, hiding the exceptions. I've been arguing this for some time, and know that not all the Church Fathers agreed on everything. Quite the contrary. My purpose, as stated, was to show a *general consensus* among the Church Fathers on this subject. See my post in #153.
All you do is produce facts that I already know, that a couple of Church Fathers, Irenaeus and Hippolytus, held a different position on the 70th Week of Daniel. Cyril of Jerusalem and Origen may have held a similar view, but the point remains that a strong majority of the Church Fathers held to the historical view of Luke 21, and saw in this the dispersion of the Jews after 70 AD.
This means they held, as a general consensus, the Great Tribulation to be the Jewish Diaspora, and not the endtime reign of Antichrist. The fact that several of them believed the Abomination of Desolation was Antichrist does not kick the majority consensus down to a minority view!
Consider this link, where the author says:
"Irenaeus and his pupil Hippolytus are the only two writers from the early Church period who believed in a still-future fulfillment of Daniel’s 70th week."
The Early Church Fathers and the Last Days of the Jewish Age
Now it may be true that some of the Church Fathers did not perfectly equate the 70th Week of Daniel with the Olivet Discourse. Accordingly, some like Irenaeus, Hippolytus, and a few others, misinterpreted the Abomination of Desolation to be the future Antichrist rather than as the 70th Week indicated--imminent judgment upon the Jews in 70 AD.
It remains that a logical view of the 70th Week would more properly interpret the AoD as the Roman siege of Jerusalem 66-70 AD. Some of the Church Fathers missed that, but the majority of them did not.
My thought is that the Church Fathers generally held to an historical fulfillment of the 70 Weeks prophecy, but that a few of them considered the 70th Week to be future, including Irenaeus and Hippolytus. This would've required them to separate off the 70th Week from the previous 69 Weeks--something that most of the Church Fathers *did not do!*
I might conclude, then, that those who saw a future 70th Week, among the Church Fathers, would likely have interpreted the Olivet Discourse as follows. The Abomination of Desolation would be Antichrist, but the Great Tribulation would be the dispersion of the Jewish People after 70 AD.
But virtually all of the Church Fathers held to an historical view of the 70 Weeks of Daniel, leading up to the destruction of Jerusalem and to the dispersion of the Jewish People, the "Great Tribulation." Only a relative few of them saw a future interpretation of the 70th Week, and a prophecy of the Antichrist.
This caused these few "outliers" among the Church Fathers to irrationally separate out the Abomination of Desolation as the Antichrist from the fall of Jerusalem mentioned in Dan 9. But logically, if the 70th Week of Daniel is tied to the Abomination of Desolation in 70 AD, it would have to have been tied to the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD, and to the Great Tribulation of the Jewish People, taking place after 70 AD.