"However, this is not the only source for the book. It is mentioned by Eusebius in about 324 AD. It is called by him the Book of the Twelve Apostles. Eusebius seems to be aware that some considered the book to be sub-canonical, but he rejects its status. The Didache is also mentioned by Athanasius (367) and Rufinus (380 AD). Both deny its part in the canon of the New Testament, but the very fact that they mention it shows that the book was held in high regard by the early church–in fact it shows that some considered it inspired or sub-inspired. Surely this moves the Didache to the very early second century at the latest. It became part of the Ethiopian/Coptic list of sub-canonical books. It is the consensus of scholars that the Didache is probably a late first century catechism, although some put it in the very early second century. I believe this is very likely a correct date for this book.
A number of early church fathers quote from the Didache. Clement of Alexandria, Origen quote from it and Polycarp and Ignatius appear to use the Didache. The similarity of their quotes to the text from the eleventh century tells us that the manuscript we have is at least a reasonable facsimile of the original Didache. Obviously, we cannot do anywhere nearly as good a textual criticism of this book as we can with the Greek text of the New Testament with so few manuscripts, but we can reasonably conclude that the Didache we have is fairly close to the original. "
How reliable are the texts we have for the Didache, Irenaeus and Ignatius? – Evidence for Christianity
evidenceforchristianity.org
Looks like there is only one Latin manuscript for the Didache, thus there is no evidence of it being rewritten, friend.
