Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I did a bit of research on that statement some time ago, because of the way it is translated in some Bibles....The paradigm, of course, is Saul of Tarsus being struck blind on the road to Damascus and hearing a voice from Heaven telling him to stop kicking against the pricks.
![]()
These are interesting points that we should all consider....So here are my replies:
You sound like a non-orthodox Christian....
maybe LDS.
So many Scriptures tell us that we have to remain “faithful unto death” to inherit “the crown of life”, that no one has an excuse to believe that we don’t need effort to remain on the narrow road to life....a road that “few” will find. (Matt 7:13-14; Matt 24:13)So the above is for OSAS:
It doesn't exist in the bible...
not for the spirit, soul or body.
Jesus set the pattern because there were two baptisms.....John’s baptism was for forgiveness of sins committed against the Law.....yet Jesus had no sin to be forgiven, which is why John hesitated.The NT teaches that we are to be baptized for the forgiveness of sins.
You're questioning it....maybe...not sure.
Jesus did not require baptism...
but we do.
I investigated the Mormon faith when I was doing my own search for God but found the tenets so far removed from Scripture and a reliance on books that virtually replaced it, I saw no merit in that faith even though I admired the people.No. I don't believe I'm a God or a god.
LDSs do.
We are in trouble if we don’t inspect the fruit before we eat it. If it’s contaminated, our worship becomes contaminated as well.Agreed.
We're all fruit inspectors.
I guess I should have asked what YOU think the real deal is as to knowing that one is born again.It's not that, as far as I can tell. I think this is more about the need for certainty. Part of that is knowing whether one's "born-again" experience was the real deal.
It's not that, as far as I can tell. I think this is more about the need for certainty. Part of that is knowing whether one's "born-again" experience was the real deal.
I guess I should have asked what YOU think the real deal is as to knowing that one is born again.
Your reply in post #53 has no hint of him but rather a collection of what you are interested in.Is Jesus not the being that taught about the above?
Is He not the one that began His church and promised that the gates of hell would not prevail?
Are we not taught that in the last days many would fall from faith believing doctrines of demons?
What kind of question are you asking?
Jesus is God.
Where do YOU think He is?
Of course there are teachings in the OT that pertain even till this day.These are interesting points that we should all consider....
There are many denominations which are considered “unorthodox” by those who follow Christendom’s basic teachings....who all identify as “Christians”.
It’s a bit like the practice of medicine....things once considered “orthodox” were replace by what was claimed to be superior to that old “quackery”. So what was once “orthodox” now became “unorthodox” medicine....but was it really superior?
The fact that medicine today is a money making machine that has no scruples when it comes to charging like wounded elephants for their services and prescription medicines...even though there are no “cures” in today’s medicine, only “treatments” designed to give symptom control, but making sure that “wellness” (a lessening of symptoms) is dependent on a lifetime commitment to their drugs. $$$$
Many are now returning to the old ways, as they work without a scroll of horrible side effects.
In our day, the same thing is happening.....people are not content to be spoon fed their religion and rituals...they want to know the truth amidst all that confusion.
Similar also are the terminologies used with the Bible itself as “Old Testament” and “New Testament”....the word “old” suggests that it has been superseded by the “new”....but nothing could be further from the truth.
”All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching”.....so we need the whole book in order to be instructed by its author.
Correct.We cannot understand what Jesus (as a Jew, using Jewish Scripture) was teaching his fellow Jews unless we read it through that lens.
Agreed.So many Scriptures tell us that we have to remain “faithful unto death” to inherit “the crown of life”, that no one has an excuse to believe that we don’t need effort to remain on the narrow road to life....a road that “few” will find. (Matt 7:13-14; Matt 24:13)
Agreed. Jesus was baptized also to do everything correctly...to be righteous in all ways.Jesus set the pattern because there were two baptisms.....John’s baptism was for forgiveness of sins committed against the Law.....yet Jesus had no sin to be forgiven, which is why John hesitated.
Jesus’ baptism was to signal the beginning of his ministry as Messiah...a course that he knew would lead to his sacrificial death. It was a symbolic dying to his former life and a rising up to do the will of his Father and to redeem mankind.
Only one baptism is necessary.Christian baptism contains elements of both because those baptized by John also had to be baptized again in the name of Jesus Christ, signalling a new life course for them as Christiansl.
Anyone who says we do not need to be baptized in water cannot be baptized with holy spirit because water baptism had to come first.
Couldn't agree more.I investigated the Mormon faith when I was doing my own search for God but found the tenets so far removed from Scripture and a reliance on books that virtually replaced it, I saw no merit in that faith even though I admired the people.
I'd agree with you except I do want to say that some pastors make mistakes and some teachers make mistakes.We are in trouble if we don’t inspect the fruit before we eat it. If it’s contaminated, our worship becomes contaminated as well.
Those appointed to lead us are under obligation to remove any kind of contamination from those in the congregation who would cause division or who practice what God’s word condemns. (1 Cor 5:9-13)
Yes. But what are these false religions?We must be united in all ways, (1 Cor 1:10) unencumbered by cultural influences, or from any practices that originate from false religion. (2 Cor 6:14-18)
I DID hear the question behind the question.Do you hear Ernie's question-behind-the-question, "How do I know if I'm really saved?"
That venerable Calvinist John MacArthur wrote a book on that, Saved Without a Doubt. It wasn't very reassuring. In that system, if you're not saved, you're probably not going to get saved, though it could be you're just not saved yet. But if you are one of the Elect, you won't fall away because God will keep you from doing the things that make one finally and irrevocably fall away. God is sovereign, yet Man is responsible. And even MacArthur himself said he didn't know how that works out.
(Since you mentioned OSAS and Calvinism.)
Oh my.Your reply in post #53 has no hint of him but rather a collection of what you are interested in.
Why are you concerned for “THE CHURCH? ....who, or what is “the church” anyway?Concerning the dilemma of ERNIE I am truly concerned, and he has truly been absent. As for his question, which I had actually never even considered, until now? I am still very concerned. But, not so much for me anymore. I am actually more concerned now, for THE CHURCH
Yes...the beginning of a new course in life.Jesus was baptized also to do everything correctly...to be righteous in all ways.
I'm not sure what you mean by the statement of Jesus' dying to His former life...
I think you just mean that it was the beginning of His ministry and He left His old life behind.
There are still two baptisms now, as the first one is made in full knowledge of what it means to be a Christian, and comes with the forgiveness of sins (with the blood Jesus shed on our behalf) and a presenting of ourselves according to that knowledge, and the making of a commitment to God as a footstep follower of his precious son.Only one baptism is necessary.
Do you believe there are two baptisms...
one for the forgiveness of sins and one for receiving the Holy §Spirit? (both in water).
Yes, those who take the lead are held to a much higher standard and accountability as was demonstrated even in Jesus’ day with the Pharisees....because they had led the people into error, Jesus consigned them to “Gehenna”....a place of no return. Religious leaders even today are held to that same standard.Those appointed to lead are held to a higher standard as per James 3:1 but many times they fail.
And, yes, of course I agree with 1 Cor 5:9-13
We're in the world but should not be a part of it - as one pastor explained this.
Also, I'd say that we should be a good example.
All false religion in the Bible is grouped into one entity, called in Revelation, “Babylon the great” or “the greater Babylon” (Rev 17:3-6; Rev 18:4-5)....so what is the Babylon connection?Yes. But what are these false religions?
And herein lies the problem.
What's the difference between a false religion and just a different teaching?
That's how it's done GG. All manner of religious talk, expressions and important sounding stuff is substituted for a knowledge of HIM.Oh my.
Did my reply no. 53 state that I had some food to eat yesterday?
No.
Does that mean I had no food yesterday?
Come on quietthinker.
Address the post if you want to,,,,
but why change the subject?
You don't have to reply if you don't care to.
No comment.That's how it's done GG. All manner of religious talk, expressions and important sounding stuff is substituted for a knowledge of HIM.
It all amounts to being no more attracted to jelly beans than to Jesus.....and all this is done with good intentions.

We just might be on the same page.
Unfortunately I don't go through an entire thread so sometimes it takes a couple of posts...
I believed in God, but I accepted JESUS as my savior and lord. And when I did I FELT born again. I never doubted that experience again. But the only thing saved (born again) that night, was my spirit. And though HE WAS/IS LORD, my soul (mind, will, intellect) had a long way to go to be making HIM MY Lord. Because every time we sin our actions deny our confession. When He says don't sin and we do....just makes us saying He IS my Lord....an oxymoron.As far as I'm concerned, being saved is very simple:
1. Believe in God.
2. Obey Him.
41 years after the church was started??? I'm not persuaded.That's being SAVED.
But it does not mean one is CHRISTIAN.
That's a different story.
There is no definition for being a Christian in the bible.
The definition was worked out over a span of time.
There were no creeds in 41AD, 61AD, 62AD when the word "christian" was mentioned 3 times in ACTS. And it wasn't capitalized in the Greek. Capitalization makes us think it is a noun and therefore speaks of a person. But it's not. It is a noun which defines a verb and an adverb experience.The definition of a Christian would be that one has to accept one of the creeds.
They all define what Christians are supposed to believe....at different times of revelation.
How? Angels told Mary and Joseph. And they didn't tell anyone because an angel told them to get out of Israel and go to Egypt until it was safe to come back.For instance...it was known from the beginning that Jesus was the Son of God and that He was divine.
But how?
It took 400 years!!!! And I think that was because no one was being spirit led in the church of Rome. They were all head-led Greek and Latin theologians. The NT was written in koine Greek which was spoken from 400 BC to 450 AD, Then the Roman Catholics made mistakes translating it into the Latin in about 400 AD, then they messed up again translating the Latin back into the Greek during the Renaissance. (1400-1700 AD). I don't think most of what went on was God's doing as 'the church' thinks. And I think your "small c" began before the apostles were dead.It took time to work this out and we ended up with the Trinity-----which is in the bible, both OT and NT, but its explanation
was another matter.
The apostles wrote about it while alive....and under the inspiration of the spirit of christ in them...just like the prophets of the OT.It means more to me now, in the last few weeks, than it has for the last 53 years as a born again, water baptized, Holy Spirit baptized unknown tongue praying believer. IOW I am not an LDS. Have never cracked their bible, other than to 'fan' through it and say: "When I get 'this book' figured out, I'll look at yours."So...does being Christian actually mean anything...or can we just believe what we want to and still be defined as being Christian?

LOL
I didn't ask you to elaborate because my point was that we should agree on these topics,,,
instead we don't.
I might go back and post something on each one...
but will we agree?
I DO! His name is JESUS.DITTO !
I also am very concerned for the church (small c).
And I don't know of a solution.


Jesus is the pivotal centre of the entire Universe.
God is sovereign, yet Man is responsible. And even MacArthur himself said he didn't know how that works out.
Boy I am way behind here. And you are pointing out just how long I believed differently.@Hillsage
I realize you will not be agreeing with me.
And yet we both have CHRISTIAN under our avatar.
What do you make of this?
LOL
I try to encourage one page texts for that reason. People can't eat the elephant. And my cognitive shortcomings really get lost when you write twice to answer one.
Actually, said like that, I agree.I believed in God, but I accepted JESUS as my savior and lord. And when I did I FELT born again. I never doubted that experience again. But the only thing saved (born again) that night, was my spirit. And though HE WAS/IS LORD, my soul (mind, will, intellect) had a long way to go to be making HIM MY Lord. Because every time we sin our actions deny our confession. When He says don't sin and we do....just makes us saying He IS my Lord....an oxymoron.
Who said anything about 41 years??41 years after the church was started??? I'm not persuaded.
Why do we make everything so complicated?There were no creeds in 41AD, 61AD, 62AD when the word "christian" was mentioned 3 times in ACTS. And it wasn't capitalized in the Greek. Capitalization makes us think it is a noun and therefore speaks of a person. But it's not. It is a noun which defines a verb and an adverb experience.
Please seeHow? Angels told Mary and Joseph. And they didn't tell anyone because an angel told them to get out of Israel and go to Egypt until it was safe to come back.
So are you saying that we have scripture that is corrupted?It took 400 years!!!! And I think that was because no one was being spirit led in the church of Rome. They were all head-led Greek and Latin theologians. The NT was written in koine Greek which was spoken from 400 BC to 450 AD, Then the Roman Catholics made mistakes translating it into the Latin in about 400 AD, then they messed up again translating the Latin back into the Greek during the Renaissance. (1400-1700 AD).
Yes sir.I don't think most of what went on was God's doing as 'the church' thinks. And I think your "small c" began before the apostles were dead.The apostles wrote about it while alive....and under the inspiration of the spirit of christ in them...just like the prophets of the OT.
Jesus did say to not fear those that could kill the body but those that could kill the soul.1PE 1:9 Receiving the END of your faith, even the salvation of your SOULS. The beginning of your faith saved your spirit
10 Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you: 11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them....
This is good to hear.It means more to me now, in the last few weeks, than it has for the last 53 years as a born again, water baptized, Holy Spirit baptized unknown tongue praying believer. IOW I am not an LDS. Have never cracked their bible, other than to 'fan' through it and say: "When I get 'this book' figured out, I'll look at yours."
The solution is Jesus?No we don't, welcome to 'CHURCHIANITY. Yeah, lots to discuss there for sure. But throw one out at a time.
I DO! His name is JESUS.![]()
What is The Way?Boy I am way behind here. And you are pointing out just how long I believed differently.
BUT the FORUM choices probably didn't give me "The WAY" as an option.
ACT 9:2 and asked for letters from him to the synagogues at Damascus, so that if he found any belonging to the Way, both men and women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.
ACT 19:9 But when some were becoming hardened and disobedient, speaking evil of the Way before the people, he withdrew from them and took away the disciples, reasoning daily in the school of Tyrannus.
ACT 19:23 About that time there occurred no small disturbance concerning the Way.
Dang, only capitalized 3 times in 3 translations NAS NKJ NIV for no biblical reason that I see. I'm quitting.....for tonight.