bbyrd009
Groper
- Nov 30, 2016
- 33,943
- 12,081
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
- Country
- United States Minor Outlying Islands
hmm. Beliefs do not require legs, like walking doesour walks (beliefs) are different.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
hmm. Beliefs do not require legs, like walking doesour walks (beliefs) are different.
Hi DPM,View attachment 1171
The messenger brings the word from the authority, to the person.
Who’s interpretation is true?
the boy's interpretation is true, as long as there is no authority present to supersede his decision, isn’t it? Surly the fulfillment was according to boy and out the context and the spirit of the message that was sent. This seems to be the case in today’s society. To go by one’s own judgement and not according the authority who sent the word, and disregard for the judgement thereof, of which the messenger found abhorring.
Just saying that proves that you have bought into the nonsense.Isn't this situational ethics?
Hi DPM,
You seem to be suggesting that we need authority to interpret scripture. If so, who's authority is TRUE when interpreting scripture?
If you are not suggesting that, disregard this post.
Mary
Yes. This is all well and good and I agree.@GG, forgot to address
I go with the early Church father, the original members. and we have their writing/letters. the apostle Peter, Paul, James, Jude. and his disciples testimony, our brothers, Stephens, Ananias, doctor Luke, the minister preacher, like our sister Phebe. she also the first Bishop of the church at Rome, our ministering sister Euodias, and Syntyche. and which I cannot forget both of our bishops who is husban and wife, Priscilla and Aquila. and the list go on.
I agree.no your are not responsible enough to interpret scripture. God speaks from His own view, hence He is the interpreter thereof, if you are not getting it. Jesus is the fulfillment thereof, therefore the interpretation thereof, according to the Father's satisfaction. if either one of those children in the comic strip didn't understand, they go ask who? wouldn't that be the authority or the one who spoke it, in this case their mother?
the giver of the instructions is the interpreter of the instructions, hence one has to have a relationship with that giver of instruction. could be parents could be one's boss on the job, could be one's teacher, could be the Lord God who gave you a Life to live. we don't know how to live that Life without the instructions to do so.
So you're saying that John the Apostle didn't know the truth and he didn't pass it on?Totally agree.
This has proved true in my life ...when a baby Christian He shows us one level in a scripture or chapter...then as we mature He shows it a little deeper...and so on.
I still maintain that no one yet..NO, we cannot KNOW all truth, I find that pretty arrogant when people say that they know...they are deluded..not even the early church fathers...none. In fact I would go as far as to say I don't believe those who wrote what God anointed them to write down which is now our bible...clearly understood all that they were writing under the anointing. But that is an aside.
Only God Himself knows all things. People may like to think that they know...but they don't.
Even Paul would not say that he knew all things clearly!
"We know in part...we see in part..through a glass darkly......1 Cor 13:9 - " For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.
10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away."
No problem with the misunderstanding.you got me there, I read that wrong, I thought you knew better, and was surprised when I though you said otherwise. but it is a mistake on my part, you are correct on "WE are not responsible enough to interpret scripture." its no excuse but one sees so much garbage posted one can assume to see more of the same.
the bottom line on this though is we are incorrect and Jesus is correct, at all times, everywhere, 24/7, in His Kingdom and throughout creation.
its SOP on Christian sites to have threads like "what is a Christian" and Jesus is what a Son of God or a child of God is. a Ferrari is a Ferrari, a dodge isn't a Ferrari. and a Ferrari is counterfeit if it isn't made by the Ferrari in a Ferrari plant. therefore a child of God must be of God.
Joh 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.
hence that which is of heaven is in heaven and remains in heaven, that which isn't of heaven cannot ascend into heaven.
Sure.Isn't interpreting where they twist scriptures to mean what they want it to mean so that it supports their theology????
Two of the most overlooked words in Paul's writings are BUT and NOW.
Could you answer with more than one sentence?Just saying that proves that you have bought into the nonsense.
So how come there are different ways of understanding scripture if there is only ONE authority?Jesus the Word of God made flesh is the authority, hence the actual authority is the Father who said "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased". hence the correct interpretation is the fulfillment thereof that is approved by the sender thereof.
No problem with the misunderstanding.
Yes. Only that which is of heaven is going to heaven.
That's what Jesus meant in John 3. We must be born from above, if we want to go above. Those who do not know God, cannot go to be with a being they don't know.
Spirit draws spirit.
So how come there are different ways of understanding scripture if there is only ONE authority?
Could it be that we listen to HUMANS instead of God??
Our favorite pastor, our favorite YOUTUBE minister (for goodness sake).
How about reading scripture with GOD in mind.
Using a little common sense...
And accepting what it plainly says instead of dancing around the bush.
whose authority is true in "seek your own salvation?"who's authority is TRUE when interpreting scripture?
or Catholics, whatever. Protestants do not refer to it iow.For instance, did you ever read the didache?
An instruction manual for Christians.
good Q imo--does a mother treat all of her children the same?So does the mother tell each one of us something different?
"behold, I stand at the door and knock..."Is it our choice to be saved or does God pick who will be saved?
interesting to me the amount of trouble one has extracting a single "absolute" truth from Scripture thoughNo absolute right or wrong, but what SEEMS to be right or wrong AT THE TIME.
ha-quote us a plain statement thenAnd accepting what it plainly says instead of dancing around the bush.