Unless more women start winning in motorsports, then men will always be the more skillful drivers. There is no other measure to say otherwise.
I don't agree with that. Men and women are like forks and spoons; they go together and are best suited for different things.
Just like who is the GOAT in sports, comparing men and women depend on the standard used to measure. You are right that F1 results is a great standard to measure driving skill and I reject
@TLHKAJ's claim that being cautious is a skill. Prudence is a virtue not a skill.
A major divide between men and women is managing risk.
Women tend to avoid it and men OBVIOUSLY manage it much, much better.
@TLHKAJ can only claim
in theory that women are equally good at managing risk because every measurable
in practice shows the opposite -
avoiding risk is not the same as
managing risk. One must embrace risk to be given credit for managing it.
Notice her cop out; women aren't interested in F1 racing? This is her way of acknowledging the facts are not on her side. This explains why all the pressure and societal expectation is on the man to take the risk.
- Women don't compete with men to find out what that noise was in the middle of the night.
- Why do men have the burden to PROTECT? Not only are they physically superior, they are superior in managing the risk - and being prudent - that comes with physical and other types of protection.
- In a thread years ago I asked the question, "Is it prudent to sexually solicit a rapist?" The question was designed to show the risk and responsibility women take for dressing provocatively in public. In societies that are not so feminized, men don't allow women to sexually solicit rapists. This is a form of PROTECTION. Feminists call it oppression while denying there is such a thing as guilty victims (of rape); it's all men's fault.
- IF it's all men's fault, then it's all the men who have the power to PROTECT, including deciding rules of prudent, cautious behavior. Feminists want to separate one side of the coin from the other.
- Women don't compete with men to ask a potential mate out for a date.
- Women don't compete with men to pay their share of the cost of the first date.
- Women don't compete with men to be humiliated at the alter waiting for the groom to come to them or be made the fool.
- Women don't compete with men in business in managing risk but want equal representation in the boardroom as a matter of sexism not merit. With power comes responsibility but women want all the power but none of the responsibility, none of the risk that comes with making a decision. That's where victim mentality comes in; somewhere there's a man who is at fault for what these 'strong and independent' feminists choose to do. You may not be that creative to connect the dots but they are!
When men act cautiously, women often invoke shaming language, such as,
"if you were a real man you'd ..." I always find it funny when a women asserts superior knowledge in knowing what a real man does. LOL
Having said all that, I agree with
@TLHKAJ's that the standard of accident breakdown by sex is a perfectly legitimate standard to measure what sex is the better driver. F1 racers make up a small percentage of the driving population. Two standards. Two ways of measuring. Two different conclusions. Who knew?
