No comment.No kidding.
And once again - that won't stop me from exposing you.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No comment.No kidding.
And once again - that won't stop me from exposing you.
No kidding.
And once again - that won't stop me from exposing you.
WRONG again.
You let them.....The Church doesn’t: Matthew 18:17Some people want to walk in their own shoes, and so I let them.
Bobby Jo
Sooooo no answer? After all you interjected yourself into the conversation. The least you could do is TRY and answer the question instead of being flippant.Protestants trying to be like Catholics.
"You" is not the phoney baloney RCC.Nope - there's NOTHING nicer than the words of Jesus Himself - and HE told the leaders of HIS Church:
Matt 16:16-19
I will give YOU the keys to the kingdom of heaven. WHATEVER YOU BIND on earth shall be bound in heaven; and WHATEVER YOU LOOSE on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
Matt. 18:15-18
Amen, I say to you, WHATEVER YOU BIND on earth shall be bound in heaven, and WHATEVER YOU LOOSE on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
Luke 10:16
Whoever listens to YOU listens to ME. Whoever rejects YOU rejects ME. And whoever rejects ME rejects the ONE who sent ME."
John 16:12-15
“I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear it now.
But when he comes, the Spirit of truth, he will guide you to ALL truth. He will not speak on his own, but he will speak what he hears, and will declare to YOU the things that are coming.
He will glorify me, because he will TAKE from what is MINE and declare it to YOU.
Everything that the Father has is MINE; for this reason I told you that he will TAKE from what is MINE and declare it to YOU.
Nothin' like good ol' God-given Church Authority . . .
You did it again....Peter said the name is Jesus Christ(Acts 2:38), and you say "No".Complete hypocrisy and contradiction . . .
FIRST, you say that I was trying to "debunk" Acts 2:28, which says to be Baptized "in the name of Jesus Christ."
THEN, you say that "Nobody" was ever Baptized in the titles.
What do you think "CHRIST" is, Einstein. It's a TITLE that means, "Anointed One."
Your ignorance just blows me away . . .
No - ONLY when it's untrue.Which is every time someone posts something you do not like.
No - Peter understood that his command for all to be Baptized "in the name of Jesus Christ" simply meant by His AUTHORITY.You did it again....Peter said the name is Jesus Christ(Acts 2:38), and you say "No".
Good thing you were not there to rebuke Peter for naming him "Jesus the Christ", or later, "Jesus Christ of Nazareth".
You would have followed him around correcting him, all the while in the back of your head, mumbling to yourself, "the name of the son is son".
Yup - and their successors (Acts 1:20)."You" is not the phoney baloney RCC.
Nor is it Mary Baker Eddy. Nor is it Joseph Smith. Nor Jim Jones etc.
It is the 12 Apostles.
You do realize that “RCC commentary” came BEFORE Protestant commentary? Sooooo you got it backwards.Typical RCC commentary attempting to debunk Acts 2:38.
No commentI am presenting FACTS - Biblical, historical and linguistic.
YOU, on the other hand are simply blowing it all off with your "No comment" responses - so WHOSE posts are the more worthless here??
If you want to have charitable dialogue - then BE charitable.
Think about it . . .
No commentSooooo no answer? After all you interjected yourself into the conversation. The least you could do is TRY and answer the question instead of being flippant.
Why don't you reject both commentaries and go cold turkey, sole scriptura like I do?You do realize that “RCC commentary” came BEFORE Protestant commentary? Sooooo you got it backwards.
The historical fact is that Protestant commentary is an attempt to debunk Catholic commentary. @BreadOfLife is not attempting to debunk anything. YOU are attempting to debunk him.
Keeping the facts straight....Mary
LOL....and their successors.Yup - and their successors (Acts 1:20).
You see - the Catholic Church has a UNBROKEN line of Apostolic Succession.
YOUR sect can only go back as far as the 16th century - and probably not even that far . . .
Is that what Peter really meant in Acts 4:12 also?No - Peter understood that his command for all to be Baptized "in the name of Jesus Christ" simply meant by His AUTHORITY.
YOU'RE the one who doesn't get it - so YOU'D be the one following him around and trying to "correct" him . . .
The KJV is our only hope and source. You just made my case.Yup - until somebody else interprets those original words differently that YOU.
Then you have what we have today:
Tens of thousands of disjointed and perpetually-splintering sects that ALL teach different doctrines yet ALL claim that THEIR interpretation is "correct".
Ummmmmm, not very "bullet-proof".
What a mess . . .
The KJV is our only hope and source.