You do err,the bible was not just written for white people,that's just the line that Christ would come through.The Word of God was written to all that would receive it......
Genesis 1:27"So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them."
Genesis 1:28 "And God blessed them, and God said unto them, "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, ad over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth."
Genesis 1:31 "And God saw every thing that He had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."
That teaching is where racisim comes from,and it's not taught in the word of God!!!!
Those 'men' that were created in His image, are Adam as well, a race being created.
Jesus would have been labeled a racist, He told the Canaanite woman that He came only for the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel and that we aren't to cast the childrens bread before DOGS. If we were to go around and teach that blacks, or asians, were dogs, we would surely be labeled racist. Its funny how racism can only apply to the white people anyway. Its okay for black panthers to threaten to kill white children on the evening news, but we can't even tell someone else that we are proud of our own kind.
The simple teaching of 'kind after kind' is racist in its own right I suppose in this age. The secular world, more specifically the Jews, want us all to be one race, mixed and not of the 'kind' that God planted here.
The term racist wasn't even used in the English language until the late 1920's if I'm not mistaken, so what was it called before that. Why did President Lincoln, 'the savior of the black slaves' state that it was futile for Whites and blacks to co-habitate? He himself declared that they were inferior to Whites. You give them an area of town, and in a few years it becomes a slum, how is it racist to point that out? Just because a people is incapable of behaving like a white person doesn't mean that it isn't the natural order of things. God has a purpose for all those that He created, but those which were not planted in this earth will be rooted up and burned at the end...
God hates racemixing, as it destroys His perfect creation, so is it wrong to hate what He hates?
It says salvation comes to the Jew first. Hence, first Christ seeked out the lost sheep of Israel. The apostles were Jewish, so on so forth.
After that, they are sent to the end of the world.
As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved.
Prove the apostles were Jewish please. I know they were of different tribes or families of Israel, but to call them Jewish is calling them anti-Christian. The Jews HATE Jesus and everything he stood for, and to this day seek the destruction of White Christian nations through the control they have gained by their usury in the world banks. House of Rothschild is the 8th beast of Revelation, alive and well in this day and age.
The verse quoted is not talking about,(The man )Adam,did you miss the male and female ?All races were created on the 6th day,even the white race.....The Man Adam was not formed until the eight day!Adam is used to define all people.however The Man Adam is used of
Genesis 2:7 "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul."
The word "formed" is used [molded as clay] to describe the making of Adam. When man was formed he became a living creature. In the Hebrew it is "eth-ha-adham", which refers to the particular person "Adam", (not a generic form for man). The "Ha-Adham" [Adam] is the man that Christ will come forth through. Matthew 1:1-17, and Luke 3:23-38 both give us our documentation that this is true and did come to pass. Paul states in I Corinthians 15:21-23 that sin came into the world by the first Adam, but by the second Adam [Christ} all shall be made alive. Christ is the first fruits [to come out of the grave to everlasting life], and then "they that are Christ's at His coming". There was death by the first Adam, and salvation by Christ Himself.
The fact that other races were created before the Man Adam does not diminish them in one bit,for as I stated earlier,God saw all that He created,and it was good!!!!
There is no 8th day creation. On the 7th day God rested from His work and called everything He had created 'good'. The male and female created prior to Genesis 1:27 were adamic in nature as well. The very word Adam means to show blood, so that is enough proof for me that Adam was white, there are no other races on this earth which can blush, or in whom the blood can be seen through the skin.
Science proves that other races were here before God made Adam, but the bible is 'the book of the Generations(family line) of Adam(the ruddy men.)" So it does not encompass anyone else.
My question for you is, why is it wrong to set apart the Adamic peoples, when God specifically did so Himself by choosing Noah who was 'perfect in His generations'? Its okay for many people to believe that Jews are somehow chosen and special, but that can't apply to anyone else. How would you respond to a black hebrew believer. Their doctrine teaches that all races come from Blacks and that somewhere in antiquity,(no proof to be found however), their people were a powerful and mighty people?
The Anglo-Saxon, Celtic peoples of the world have fulfilled EVERY prophecy given of Israel, and being that Jacob was a white Adamic man, common sense should put it together. David was 'ruddy in his youth" The Nazarites were white as snow. I just don't understand where the animosity toward this teaching comes from. Unless a person has been given over to a reprobate mind because they simply refuse to believe what Gods Word says.
Racist.. Learn the meaning
woe to you SCRIBES and Pharisees
Apology only when warranted,I feel you owe every non white person an apology,heck I think you owe them one as well!
The Book of Kings which is our only source document for "Queen of Sheba" says she was "Queen Sheba of Ophir". This is concluded by realising the vav conjunctive that links I Kings 10:1 with the last verse of the previous chapter about Solomon's sailors circumnavigating or going to Ophir means the Queen Sheba ("Malchat Sheba") is the one who ruled Ophir-Auphirah or Africa. In those days, Africans mainly inhabited the Nile River Valley system perhaps to the middle of modern Sudan. Today the land of the uppermost reaches of the Nile is named Ethiopia. Last century we called it Abyssinia. This was the 'Inia" of Abbyss. The latter was a transliteration from the Kebra Nagast, Ethiopia's Holy Book. Originally it was written from right to left and some variants may still be written that way. Re-ordering "Abyss" we get "Ssyba" or "Shyba". That is of course the Hebrew "Sheba" (Shin, Beit, Aleph). In Hebrew, Sheba/shepa means to sit and rule, judge, ajudicate, decree or write laws etc. Malchat Sheba was therefore the person who did this for "Ophir". Ophir in Hebrew is "Aleph, Vav, Pe, Yod, Resh, He" or transliterated into English letters: Auphirah or Aufirah or Afirha. or of course Africa. Few things in this world are as certain as the fact that Sheba was black. The only woman who left us with evidence that she ruled Africa or the Ethiopians was Hatshepsut of Egypt and Ethiopia.
"Ethiopia" is probably 'Eth' or the Hebrew definite article (Aleph, Tav, or Greek Alpha and Omega) and a corruption of Ophir or Opirah hence "Eth-Opirah" or Eth-op-ia". Since 'r' was used to indicate how vowels should be expressed (e.g., as we say "Holborn" in London), it may have been a fashion at some time for scribes to omit the 'r' in Ophirah, turn the fricative 'ph' into 'p' and end up with something like "Ethiopia". "The South" is now used to name the region known today as "The Sudan".
The words of Solomon in the Song of Solomon 2:14: "You are in the clefts of the rock in the secret places of the stairs", which amply describes the setting of Hatshepsut's temple at Deir el-Bahari, is of course all about a black woman: "Don't look down on me daughters of Jerusalem because the sun has looked down on my ancestors". A black queen of Ophir-Africa coming to visit Solomon and a temple in Egypt built by Africa's only real Queen of all Africa(ns) reflecting some well-known but rather obscure words written by the great king should at least receive some prima facie credit that perhaps Hatshepsut was indeed "Sheba". If science has any validity left in this world, it should surely be prepared to at least discuss the possibility!
Every non white in this country has been wanting something from the whites for years now. I refuse to give any thing to them. They came here seeking OUR success, and when it gives rules which they didn't like, they sought ways to change our way of life. Success in the year 2008, now we have a stranger as a leader, when that is blatantly forbidden by God!
Apologies! Thats a joke. When these non whites stop being heathens, marrying into our race, and asking for fair treatment when they aren't even qualified for half the treatment they receive. You've got to be kidding.
Apology only when warranted,I feel you owe every non white person an apology,heck I think you owe them one as well!
The Book of Kings which is our only source document for "Queen of Sheba" says she was "Queen Sheba of Ophir". This is concluded by realising the vav conjunctive that links I Kings 10:1 with the last verse of the previous chapter about Solomon's sailors circumnavigating or going to Ophir means the Queen Sheba ("Malchat Sheba") is the one who ruled Ophir-Auphirah or Africa. In those days, Africans mainly inhabited the Nile River Valley system perhaps to the middle of modern Sudan. Today the land of the uppermost reaches of the Nile is named Ethiopia. Last century we called it Abyssinia. This was the 'Inia" of Abbyss. The latter was a transliteration from the Kebra Nagast, Ethiopia's Holy Book. Originally it was written from right to left and some variants may still be written that way. Re-ordering "Abyss" we get "Ssyba" or "Shyba". That is of course the Hebrew "Sheba" (Shin, Beit, Aleph). In Hebrew, Sheba/shepa means to sit and rule, judge, ajudicate, decree or write laws etc. Malchat Sheba was therefore the person who did this for "Ophir". Ophir in Hebrew is "Aleph, Vav, Pe, Yod, Resh, He" or transliterated into English letters: Auphirah or Aufirah or Afirha. or of course Africa. Few things in this world are as certain as the fact that Sheba was black. The only woman who left us with evidence that she ruled Africa or the Ethiopians was Hatshepsut of Egypt and Ethiopia.
"Ethiopia" is probably 'Eth' or the Hebrew definite article (Aleph, Tav, or Greek Alpha and Omega) and a corruption of Ophir or Opirah hence "Eth-Opirah" or Eth-op-ia". Since 'r' was used to indicate how vowels should be expressed (e.g., as we say "Holborn" in London), it may have been a fashion at some time for scribes to omit the 'r' in Ophirah, turn the fricative 'ph' into 'p' and end up with something like "Ethiopia". "The South" is now used to name the region known today as "The Sudan".
The words of Solomon in the Song of Solomon 2:14: "You are in the clefts of the rock in the secret places of the stairs", which amply describes the setting of Hatshepsut's temple at Deir el-Bahari, is of course all about a black woman: "Don't look down on me daughters of Jerusalem because the sun has looked down on my ancestors". A black queen of Ophir-Africa coming to visit Solomon and a temple in Egypt built by Africa's only real Queen of all Africa(ns) reflecting some well-known but rather obscure words written by the great king should at least receive some prima facie credit that perhaps Hatshepsut was indeed "Sheba". If science has any validity left in this world, it should surely be prepared to at least discuss the possibility!
And where are these 'queens' today, you would think if Africans had the capacity to build kingdoms and monarchies, that there would be one still in existence today. Oh wait, Im sure that its the white mans fault huh? We took what was theirs and kept it for our selves?