Dishonoring The Son is dishonoring The Father. Again. Like your father Satan, you hate the Scriptures.
Joh 5:23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
You refuse to equally honor the Father and Son as demanded by the Scriptures. There is no separation between the Father and the Son. Satan tried to the do the same thing. He failed. You fail.
You will answer to the Son of God soon.
I have not read one post yet that says someone does not honor the Son of God, of our Father. Why do you keep writing that some one does not honor the Son? Is it because they do not specially write the words you want to hear? Ask then specifically next time and you will not have to assume it anymore.
John 5 :18-23 specifically speaks to our Father giving his Son authority over many things and thus the Pharisees condemned him for 'making' himself equal (in authority) to his Father, and not that he was saying he was God, his Father himself. And yes, he did claim to have been given authority from his Father, as the Son of God.
And therefore we must not only honor this authority give by his Father to his Son, we also honor the Son because this authority was given to him by his Father. This scripture incidentally does not focused on the concept of worship, as that is for another topic. So the Son is worthy of equal honor as the Father in this context, and only in this context thus far.
An analogy would be that a King, the Father, has given his Son, the Prince, all the powers and authority as himself in his stead as his proxy and ambassador when he cannot be present. Therefore the Prince is honored as not only the King's representative, also as if he was the King himself, in person. This also suggests that the King can never be the Prince and vice a versa. This is only a human to human analogy and is not really an ideal example.
Yahshua is careful in his words NOT to speak of being
exactly the SAME as his Father, in all ways, as he can never be equal of the same essence of his the Father, the only true God. He is only equal in authority in this scripture. There is clearly separation and difference on the very primal level of essence between the Father and Son.
We cannot assume just anything in scripture that even sounds logical as it exaggerates and adds in claims that is not presence. It is called adding to/into scripture more that what the scriptural context suggests or allows.
If we truly love scripture, the word of God, of the Father, then we also know that scripture originated with the Father, and never from the Son. As all authority originates and lies with the Father and he alone chooses to share his authority with others as he did with the angels. Abraham, Moses, and others, the prophets and of course his Son is a more permanent way as spoken of in this particular scripture under study.
Here's the scripture that also suggest the local context:
(NIV)
18 For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.
19 Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does. 20 For the Father loves the Son and shows him all he does. Yes, and he will show him even greater works than these, so that you will be amazed. 21 For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, even so the Son gives life to whom he is pleased to give it. 22 Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son, 23 that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father, who sent him.
And again, Yahshua, the Son was equal with his Father regarding the authority he was given to him....
Now do you demand more of others, or does scripture demand more than it actually says?