When Paul said in Hebrews 10:9 "He taketh away the first", who is He, and what did He take away?
You say forever, but Scripture prophecies differently in His Millennium.
Absolutely not. Under the definition of a testament (which dates back to ancient Biblical times, and which is actually a will and testament (Hebrews 9:15-17), there cannot be two concurrently active testaments.
Scripture says nothing of the Millennial offerings for sin are a covenant of any kind, but just animal sacrifices for sin and meat for the priesthood.
The prince among the people entering through His door, will also rule honestly without thievery.
I believe that part too.
A new testament unconditionally transcends an old testament.
True. The OT is dead and decayed altogetehr, as well as the nailed law of Moses.
There is no mention of the OT being revived, nor the law of Moses.
Just burnt offerings for sin, the feat of tabernacles, circumcision for the natural seed, both in the flesh and by the Spirit, just weights, etc...
The King will fulfill His own prophecies, even if certain other prophets forbid it.
That is why the first (old testament animal sacrifices) were taken away, in order to establish the second (New Testament Christ Sacrifice).
True.
The first can never be reinstated.
It won't. See above.
It never has, and never can, accompany the second.
The King's prophecy says otherwise.
Perhaps 'accompany' is too strong for you. The NT will continue as is, but with the risen Lord and His saints personally ministering His gospel to the people for the greatest harvest of souls unto God ever on earth, Meanwhile there will be certain practices of the King ministered by His priesthood, as well as certain festivals of the King will be kept by His nations, on pain of punishment if not.
The New Testament cannot be violated.
It's violated all the time by hypocrites, and we see at he end of the thousand years, many will be exposed as outwardly righteous only, while remaining inwardly filthy.
Scripture does not violate any Scripture at all, whether the NT gospel or prophecy of old.
Only men do that by preaching their own gospels, or prophesying their own prophecies, that violate Scripture of God.
If you have a Scriptural last word more recent than Hebrews 10:9, please quote it.
The last word of Scripture is,
Amen.
However, there are prophecies of Scripture to be fulfilled in His Millennium, showing your reading of Paul is wrong, and you have no problem disannulling parts of those prophecies, that you do not personally like.
But don't worry, none of the resurrected saints will be making burnt offerings for sin, neither for themselves nor for the people they will rule with the Lord.
That is what Paul declared that Christ did. Do you agree that Paul and Christ both knew what Ezekiel said?
Yes, which is why Christ never had any of His apostles disannulling any part of His prophecy, that He gave to Ezekiel to write down by vision of God.
But you do.
Now, a simple challenge for you: Just state plainly any part of Ezekiel's prophecy, or of other prophets, that will not come to pass in the King's future Millennium on earth.
-- The King's house built to measurement?
-- The Lord entering His house with His glory, to sit on His throne?
-- The natural priesthood of seed of Abraham?
-- The Levites that only keep charge of the gates?
-- The burnt offering for sin of the princes and people?
-- The yearly feast of tabernacles?
-- The nations flowing to the King, to hear His law and walk in His paths?
-- Those taking hold of the skirts of Jews to be led to God the King?
If the Lord does reign for thousand years on earth, which of the above will be not come to pass?