Disagreeing with an answer is one thing, but denying the answer is given at all, is dystopian.
You 'amils' are a distinct camp that practices that. Or if you do acknowledge the answer, then you purposely misstate it into something else.
Now, a simple challenge for you: Just state plainly any part of Ezekiel's prophecy, or of other prophets, that will not come to pass in the King's future Millennium on earth.
-- The King's house built to measurement?
-- The Lord entering His house with His glory, to sit on His throne?
-- The natural priesthood of seed of Abraham?
-- The Levites that only keep charge of the gates?
-- The burnt offering for sin of the princes and people?
-- The yearly feast of tabernacles?
-- The nations flowing to the King, to hear His law and walk in His paths?
-- Those taking hold of the skirts of Jews to be led to God the King?
If the Lord does reign for thousand years on earth, which of the above will be not come to pass?
I already addressed this in #57 and you already steered around it. You have to. I will repeat.
Amils believe Ezekiel was a true prophet of God. But he mentioned absolutely nothing about some future millennium. Helooked forward to Christ and His final sacrifice for sin. The conditional promises he presnted, to disobedient Old Testament Israel, that they failed to realize, through their rebellion, serves as a suitable shadow, type and figure of the perfect new covenant temple and the living water of the Spirit that flowed from Him.
Israel in Ezekiel’s day had sunk into deep idolatry and awful iniquity. God exposed the extent of the evil that existed within the camp in Ezekiel 43:8, saying,
“they have even defiled my holy name by their abominations that they have committed: wherefore I have consumed them in mine anger.” Notwithstanding, God, as is His custom, reached out in His grace, mercy and love to them, exhorting them to turn from their wicked ways. He promised that He would bless them if they obeyed His voice.
He commanded them (in v 9):
“Now let them put away their whoredom, and the carcases of their kings, far from me, and I will dwell in the midst of them for ever.”
God gave definite and unambiguous instructions to Israel regarding how they could regain the blessing of God. With God there is always the promise accompanied by the conditions. Just because God offers a blessing does not mean the outcome is a foregone conclusion. The realisation would be determined by the response. If Israel obeyed what God asked, the blessing would be released, if they didn’t it would be withheld.
Ezekiel 43:10 goes on to outline the gist and purpose of the vision of the temple, saying,
“Thou son of man, shew the house to the house of Israel, that they may be ashamed of their iniquities: and let them measure the pattern.”
Clearly God was making a genuine offer to Israel if they would only repent. Sadly, they didn't and they never entered into the reality of that offer. God essentially shows Israel a picture of what could be if they would only turn from their sin and rebellion. It was a promise of better things if only they would submit to God’s demands. It involved an improved arrangement to what existed at the time of the proposal. It was essentially a mirror that God set up in Ezekiel’s day to allow Israel to see how far (even in that day) they fell short of the old covenant requirements. It was to let Israel compare themselves and their practices against this vision of what God desired for them. God has always instructed Israel in the ideal yet they always fell short. Israel usually failed to adhere to God's conditions. In this situation God’s gracious provision did not materialise.
God simply wanted Israel to “be ashamed of their iniquities.” This was nothing new; in fact, that has always been God’s desire for His people. This was a promise that was built upon righteous conditions. If they would be repentant and humble themselves then they would experience the superior splendour of this new temple.
Ezekiel 43:11 continues,
“And if they be ashamed of all that they have done, shew them the form of the house, and the fashion thereof, and the goings out thereof, and the comings in thereof, and all the forms thereof, and all the ordinances thereof, and all the forms thereof, and all the laws thereof: and write it in their sight, that they may keep the whole form thereof, and all the ordinances thereof, and do them.”
This vision was God’s blueprint for Israel in Ezekiel’s day. It was a design that contained important religious demands and was qualified with definite spiritual provisos. Israel was simply required to obey God’s conditions. The “ordinances,” “forms” and “laws” mentioned were to be kept by Israel in Ezekiel’s day. The fact that he commanded the Israelites of his day to “do them” showed that this wasn’t some distant prophecy after the new covenant period that had no direct relevance to them in that day.
The promise/vision here was intended to stir the people to righteousness in that generation. If they submitted, if they gave themselves to obedience and righteousness, the Lord would have them build a temple for His glory in that day. Again, we can see this is a conditional promise, which Israel had to fulfil before it would come to pass. We can see that it was particular to the Jews in Ezekiel's day. It was applicable to the nation in Ezekiel’s day and depicted how God wanted Israel to live under the old covenant. This was a standard that Israel was supposed to abide by.
Adam Clarke says:
“If, in a spirit of true repentance, they acknowledge their past transgressions, and purpose in his help never more to offend their God, then teach them everything that concerns my worship, and their profiting by it.”
Of course, Israel disobeyed. They were not able to meet God's requirements therefore this temple never materialised. Despite Ezekiel’s warnings, they chose to walk in “their iniquities,” because of this, the vision of the temple that Ezekiel showed them (in chapters 40-48) was never built. History proves that they didn't because they wouldn't. This rebellious people failed to take a hold of the conditions, they therefore failed to take a hold of the blessing. That is the way it works in Scripture.
There is nothing in Ezekiel 40-48 that would suggest that this is an active ongoing unconditional promise to Israel. Quite the opposite! A greater temple followed just a few hundred years after Ezekiel's conditional vision; a temple that would last forever – God’s spiritual temple. The Old Testament sacrifices and ordinances had an expiration date, it was called the cross. Since then Christ is our lone eternal sacrifice for sin. He has rendered the rest needless and obsolete. This was an old covenant promise with old covenant ordinances that is now redundant under the new covenant arrangement. What is more, he was not speaking to some supposed generation of mortal rebels in your semi-corrupt semi-glorious future millennial age. There is zero evidence of that. Premils have created this theory to sustain their view of Revelation 20.