Should Audio-Video Recording Cameras Be Used In Elementary Public Schools?

[Truth7t7]

Just as with daycare centers, I think there should be a live feed option that is secure and accessable by parents only. And law enforcement in cases of emergency.

Definitely will make child abusers think twice?

 

[Truth7t7]

and your personal attacks and name calling don't do anything to change the fact that saying schools teach kids to be gay is just like saying schools teach kids to be black.

Nobody is born a homosexual

Homosexuals and heterosexuals learn and choose to be as they are, a person is born with their skin color without choice, your comparing apples and oranges

 

[ButterflyJones]

Definitely will make child abusers think twice?

I would hope so.
When I was very little my parents thought to ready me for kindergarten and socializing with same age peers in a couple of years hence by signing me up for a daycare.
We lived in the country, no near neighbors, and I was an only child. Our friends kids were older. I was but 3.

I lasted a day. Child abuse was policy though I knew first off what was up and plotted my only day there as one of staying under the abusers radar.

If that daycare existed today and cameras were there to see everything, the two women running the place would be in jail . And broke from lawsuits by outraged parents.

 

[Truth7t7]

I would hope so.
When I was very little my parents thought to ready me for kindergarten and socializing with same age peers, in a couple of years hence by signing me up for a daycare.
We lived in the country, no near neighbors, and I was an only child. Our friends kids were older. I was but 3.

I lasted a day. Child abuse was policy though I knew first off what was up and plotted my only day there as one of stating under the abusers radar.

If that daycare existed today and cameras were there to see everything, the two women running the place would be in jail . And broke from lawsuits by outraged parents.

Cameras would do away with 50% of the child abuse the first month they were installed, after a few cases were floating around in the News, it would be 80% stopped, how's that a bad thing?

 

[ButterflyJones]

Students homes aren't paid for by the public, the subject of the school classrooms are public property that belong to the taxpayers

Putting a child under the care of whoever in public schools, in my opinion a camera recording is necessary, to protect both the child and teacher, just like police body cams no different

It will definitely keep the bad apples in check!

Except police body cams have to be activated to record mode by the officer wearing it.

 

[bluedragon]

Somehow, rusty bucket of bolts believes that supporting the sins of the Democrats and liberals will not be held against him later in life ....In my point of view .....Nancy Pelosi and others will be side by side with Hitler .....

 

[Truth7t7]

Somehow, rusty bucket of bolts believes that supporting the sins of the Democrats and liberals will not be held against him later in life ....In my point of view .....Nancy Pelosi and others will be side by side with Hitler .....

Where does that leave the US Supreme Court of 1973 that allowed (Roe v. Wade) and the killing of millions of innocent unborn in the US (Abortion) "Scary"

 

[bluedragon]

Where does that leave the US Supreme Court of 1973 that allowed (Roe v. Wade) and the killing of millions of innocent unborn in the US (Abortion) "Scary"

How many on that court lived their lives believing they were "greater than God?"

 

[ButterflyJones]

How many on that court lived their lives believing they were "greater than God?"

They were not greater in that decision. They thought themselves equal given the abortions that are of God in the scriptures.

In secular law it was a matter of a woman's individual right to privacy. And the anti-slavery amendment.

 

[bluedragon]

They were not greater in that decision. They thought themselves equal given the abortions that are of God in the scriptures.

In secular law it was a matter of a woman's individual right to privacy. And the anti-slavery amendment.

However, the court then considered ....."There is not one section of the Constitution that grants this right." Their decision based on the fact that the Federal Government is supposed to be limited in what they consider Federal Law. So the law went back to whereitshould have been all along .....each individual state.

 

[Truth7t7]

However, the court then considered ....."There is not one section of the Constitution that grants this right." Their decision based on the fact that the Federal Government is supposed to be limited in what they consider Federal Law. So the law went back to whereitshould have been all along .....each individual state.

We have a constitution that protects human persons in the US, when the US Supreme Court decides (Personhood) begins at conception, killing the unborn (abortion) will be illegal in all US states and territories

 

[ButterflyJones]

However, the court then considered ....."There is not one section of the Constitution that grants this right." Their decision based on the fact that the Federal Government is supposed to be limited in what they consider Federal Law. So the law went back to whereitshould have been all along .....each individual state.

The error in their decision is that civil rights are not at the discretion of individual states.

Likely, before Biden is out of office the Fed will codify abortion. This is something Biden had talked about before and after the SCOTUS ruling.

 

[Truth7t7]

The error in their decision is that civil rights are not at the discretion of individual states.

Likely, before Biden is out of office the Fed will codify abortion. This is something Biden had talked about before and after the SCOTUS ruling.

I believe the US Supreme Court will rule on the definition of (Personhood)

(The liberal justices) have claimed (Personhood) is at birth

(The conservative justices) I believe will rule (Personhood) is at conception, and this will protect all human life, making abortion unconstitutional and unlawful in all 50 states and US territories

Jesus Is The Lord

 

[ButterflyJones]

I believe the US Supreme Court will rule on the definition of (Personhood)

(The liberal justices) have claimed (Personhood) is at birth

(The conservative justices) I believe will rule (Personhood) is at conception, and this will protect all human life, making abortion unconstitutional and unlawful in all 50 states and US territories

Jesus Is The Lord

God help women if they rule personhood begins at conception.
That will make every spontaneous abortion,miscarriage, prosecutable.

Personhood should only apply to the born life. That's how God decreed it.

 

[Truth7t7]

Personhood should only apply to the born life. That's how God decreed it.

Your claim is "False"

139:13KJV
13 For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb.

 

[ButterflyJones]

Your claim is "False"

139:13KJV
13 For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb.

No, it is not.

Genesis 2:7 Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

 

[bluedragon]

The error in their decision is that civil rights are not at the discretion of individual states.

Likely, before Biden is out of office the Fed will codify abortion. This is something Biden had talked about before and after the SCOTUS ruling.

Disagree. The Court agrees that the right doesn't exist and threw it back over the fence to the states. There will be no FEDERAL Codification. This will will go the way of voting rights ....Time for the voters to make sure they have State Legislatures that agree with them .....Not the Federal Government paving the road for them. That's the trouble in this nation now. Too many people, never taught the principles, or founding of this country that think that Washington DC is the baby sitter .....When the thought process was the other way around. Stay in DC and the state's decide what to do .....Seems we fought a war over that original thought.

Even Ruth Ginsberg said it was a bad decision with zero Constitutional basis whatsoever ...

 

[ButterflyJones]

Disagree. The Court agrees that the right doesn't exist and threw it back over the fence to the states. There will be no FEDERAL Codification. This will will go the way of voting rights ....Time for the voters to make sure they have State Legislatures that agree with them .....Not the Federal Government paving the road for them. That's the trouble in this nation now. Too many people, never taught the principles, or founding of this country that think that Washington DC is the baby sitter .....When the thought process was the other way around. Stay in DC and the state's decide what to do .....Seems we fought a war over that original thought.

Even Ruth Ginsberg said it was a bad decision with zero Constitutional basis whatsoever ...

We'll see. Time will tell.

FYI, some states have already codified abortion.

Women arrested for having a miscarriage, of a still birth? Unacceptable.

Lizelle Herrera's Texas arrest is a warning​

Even mistakes quickly resolved or retracted can have a chilling effect.

 

[bluedragon]

We'll see. Time will tell.

FYI, some states have already codified abortion.

Women arrested for having a miscarriage, of a still birth? Unacceptable.

Lizelle Herrera's Texas arrest is a warning​

Even mistakes quickly resolved or retracted can have a chilling effect.

Funny, why post something you haven't read fully ? She was arrested by mistake ....in fact, she actually received an apology by the DA that had filed the charge. She wasn't made to be a martyr ......it was a mistake. It happens ....Texas has since corrected their reaction within the confines of their Abortion laws.

Never been arrested by mistake? Never got a traffic ticket you got out of? You've been arrested by mistake. I've been arrested by mistake six times. Traffic tickets later admitted to be false. Fines removed and penalty points taken away. The reason I discovered it's an arrest? Going into to Montreal, I was taken into Imigration and put before a Customs Officer, she asked "Ever been arrested." "No Ma'am" "Let me advise you that if you ever received a traffic ticket, that is an arrest. You don't have to be proven guilty, charges can be dropped, but you were arrested." "May I change my plea?" "Granted and explain." "I went into great detail to explain the tickets and the reason the charges were dropped." "Anything else." "No Ma'am, I am what you would call a good boy." (I was 55 at the time) She laughed, Stamped my passport and sent me on.

I tell you this because this is a new law for the states. There will be mistakes and misques ....they will vanish over time. However, everyone reporting this foolishness has an agenda .

 

[Truth7t7]

Funny, why post something you haven't read fully ? She was arrested by mistake ....in fact, she actually received an apology by the DA that had filed the charge. She wasn't made to be a martyr ......it was a mistake. It happens ....Texas has since corrected their reaction within the confines of their Abortion laws.

Never been arrested by mistake? Never got a traffic ticket you got out of? You've been arrested by mistake. I've been arrested by mistake six times. Traffic tickets later admitted to be false. Fines removed and penalty points taken away. The reason I discovered it's an arrest? Going into to Montreal, I was taken into Imigration and put before a Customs Officer, she asked "Ever been arrested." "No Ma'am" "Let me advise you that if you ever received a traffic ticket, that is an arrest. You don't have to be proven guilty, charges can be dropped, but you were arrested." "May I change my plea?" "Granted and explain." "I went into great detail to explain the tickets and the reason the charges were dropped." "Anything else." "No Ma'am, I am what you would call a good boy." (I was 55 at the time) She laughed, Stamped my passport and sent me on.

I tell you this because this is a new law for the states. There will be mistakes and misques ....they will vanish over time. However, everyone reporting this foolishness has an agenda .

Everything I have read looks like charges were dropped do to public outcry?

Was she pregnant? Was it a stillbirth? How did the fetus die? Who performed the examination/autopsy?