Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I doubt this is true as the characters and setting is accurate. I'm not saying they dont take license; they do, but its in very good taste.
I love your enthusiasm Mattias! Maybe we should start burning the books/movies like they did at Ephesus?A non-fictionalized Jesus vs. a fictionalized Jesus.
No one in scripture thought it necessary to present a fictionalized Jesus to their audience. Why is that?
Well, if it has a Unitarian emphasis I would start donating funds to it :cool:I’m still trying to track down the Jenkins quote. It may or may not be accurate.
Have you read any of the objections Christians have raised against program?
In part I understand where you are coming from...to this day I have never watched "The Passion of the Christ" for many valid reasons, most of which are rather personal.
However, the chosen though creative in parts has applied some very good connections and portrayed events which get you thinking! That in itself cannot be wholly deemed unworthy.
F2F
I love your enthusiasm Mattias!
Maybe we should start burning the books/movies like they did at Ephesus?
I'd have a few I could throw on the fire.
F2F
Well, if it has a Unitarian emphasis I would start donating funds to it :cool:
A non-fictionalized Jesus vs. a fictionalized Jesus.
No one in scripture thought it necessary to present a fictionalized Jesus to their audience. Why is that?
If so, it would not be fiction then. Like you Jesus had a God & Heavenly Father ;)Christian criticism of The Chosen covers a lot of ground. Some complain that the program presents Jesus as only a man who has a God - Jesus being fictionalized as a unitarian. *gasp*
Would you agree without some creative license it would be difficult to do such a series?For starters, they weren’t proclaiming Jesus for the purpose of entertainment.
What might they think about Christians 2000 years later offering people a fictionalized Jesus as entertainment?
I guess we’ll find out when we meet them.
Would you agree without some creative license it would be difficult to do such a series?
No problem agreeing with that. It's the inspired Word! But I still liked watching my fav cartoon "The Prince of Egypt".Yes.
Would you agree that there is no creative license involved in the presentation of Jesus in scripture?
Should Paul have quoted two Greek writers / poets as support for his case that God does not need temples or temple services from humans?Should the apostles have used creative license to proclaim a fictionalized Jesus?
Maybe “should” isn’t the right word.
Would the apostles have used creative license to proclaim a fictionalized Jesus?
Objection. Calls for speculation.
Question withdrawn.
Should Paul have quoted two Greek writers / poets as support for his case that God does not need temples or temple services from humans?
Do you think your take on the life of Jesus (seeing we have such little recorded information) would produce something better so far?I watched The Passion of Christ and found myself in a rather uncomfortable conversation with Catholic relatives on my wife’s side of the family.
The non-fictionalized Jesus is sufficient to get me thinking.
Why put things in our minds which we know aren’t true?
Why put things in the minds of others which we know aren’t true?
As a pastor I’ve spent a fair amount of time engaged in helping people rid their minds of things which they believed to be true as a result of seeing it in a movie, or a television program, or in a book, or heard from a friend or relative.
Do you think your take on the life of Jesus (see we have such little recorded information) would produce something better?
Fiction is when the intent is violated. Do you really think the intent is /has been violated?I wouldn’t make such an attempt.
Why fictionalize Jesus to entertain ourselves and others?