"And since you reject most of the Bible it's irrelevant proving anything to you."you didn't answer the question, in that case would you read it literally? Does being born again for you mean going back into your mother womb?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
"And since you reject most of the Bible it's irrelevant proving anything to you."you didn't answer the question, in that case would you read it literally? Does being born again for you mean going back into your mother womb?
So how do you "interpret" that verse Jack?"And since you reject most of the Bible it's irrelevant proving anything to you."
You're like trying to explain the Bible to a blind, deaf and dumb person. To you, nothing in the Bible means what it says unless you like it. You pick out the parts you like to make up your own personal anti Bible religion. Reading your posts can actually be considered proof that Satan is quite alive and real.So how do you "interpret" that verse Jack?So how do you "interpret" that verse Jack?
The Bible is absolutely Literal unless the Bible clearly proves it's not.
Absolutely agree...we can count on the true word of God.....Amen!!The Bible is absolutely Literal unless the Bible clearly proves it's not.
Eternal,3 Jesus answered and said to him, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
The word of God says, we must be Born Again by the Spirit.Some believe it's the Spirit which automatically gives you this sight...
Man must be mentally re-born to “see” the Kingdom actively and morally re-born to “enter”
Another way I see it. @face2faceSome believe it's the Spirit which automatically gives you this sight...
Man/Women must be mentally re-born to “see” the Kingdom actively and morally re-born to “enter”
Thank you for your responseI will break it down.
First, Jesus' use of the word "again" is actually stated by definition in the original language as born "from above." Either way, the idea is that we are already born--just not first from "above" and therefore must also be born "again", as He says, of the "Spirit."
So we are first born below or of the flesh, but in order to enter the kingdom of God we must also be born from above or of the Spirit. Which is not "regeneration" as some would refer to it--because we were not first born of the spirit that we should need to regain it. In fact what is first born of the flesh is made up of the same elements of this [old] world and earth that the scriptures tell us are to be "destroyed with fervent heat and with fire." Thus, to be born "again" or "from above" is rightly called, "new birth"...of which Jesus is the "firstfruits."
What is being referred to here, and why being first born "of water" is also a part, refers to what was first written of in Genesis 1:7: "Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so." Meaning that we are first born of this world and its elements, but then to enter the kingdom of God we must also be born from what is not of this world, but above. Jesus, said it another way as well, saying, "That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." Clearly making the point that the two births are completely different, and there is actually no regeneration or "glorification", nor even salvation of the flesh, but rather a replacement of the flesh with the Spirit. Of which Paul even says, referring to the body of flesh, "not that body."
All of which is written...and yet those who prefer the flesh, will stand in the flesh--even in the holy place, and make their argument for it.
Actually I gave my reason why I disagreed, and agreed to disagree, I did not say anything about you.You attacked first.![]()
Yes it does. You refuse to believe the truth. Just like the average pharisee.
And have been completely disrespectful to any opinion but your own in all honesty.
So claim what you like....the truth is printed in EVERY modern translation and in history.
So keep up with what is a contortionist view of scripture that doesn't fit the narrative or the themes of John
Standing on the word of God.Titus 3:5 - Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
Ok, fair enough...I will delete my response if that’s ok....as 2 Spiritual births don’t make sense to me.I may not have been clear so just in case, I mean that two spiritual births are required not a physical plus a spiritual. That does not make sense to me.
Can you help me understand why we need 2 spiritual births?I may not have been clear so just in case, I mean that two spiritual births are required not a physical plus a spiritual. That does not make sense to me.
If you don't mind, I can explain it best according to Orthodox theology, that the walk of the believer is in three stages:Can you help me understand why we need 2 spiritual births?
And is the 2 Spiritual births in the word of God?...thanks.
I am not jack. but I will answer since I have said this also.@Jack out of interest I know you are like Nicodemus here and would question how you would enter back into your mothers womb. Your statement about reading the Bible literally falls over here - am I right?
did Jesus say this is what it means?you didn't answer the question, in that case would you read it literally? Does being born again for you mean going back into your mother womb?