BarneyFife
Well-Known Member
Suit yourself. I explained the difference between "carnal regulations" and "carnal men." Regulations are not men. You can believe as you wish.
And your explanation is diametrically opposite the Scripture in question.
Verses 16 & 18 of Hebrews 7 directly apply the descriptors "carnal," "weakness," and "unprofitableness" to the very commandments in question ("men" are not mentioned at all), themselves, unquestionably disqualifying them as being synonymous with the "holy, just, and good commandments" of Romans 7:12.
The "law changed" was the law regarding the priesthood, which is so obvious in the context of the text that the temptation to mock attempts to prove otherwise is nearly overwhelming.
I apparently bypassed that question and failed to see the validity of your question. 7th Day Adventism has been rejected for many years. Pelagianism has been rejected for many years. We're talking centuries, and not just a few years!
Another non-answer—how long, personally?
Pelagianism is just a superfluous straw man distraction and consensus has rejected all forms of Christianity for millennia.
You suit yourself.
.