It's only "false" to those who accept the word of the devil over the Word of God.
No, healing in the Atonement
is false. I showed why from God's word. Just flatly contradicting what I showed doesn't do anything to establish I'm mistaken in understanding God's word, or that you're correct in your belief about healing. You're just contradicting. This is no more than children do in arguments with each other on the playground.
The Apostle Paul was stoned and left for dead by a group of Jews in Lystra, as described in Acts 14:19-20. However, he miraculously recovered and continued his missionary work the next day and he faced other near deaths as well
No, the account in
Acts 14 says
nothing - not a word - about Paul "miraculously recovering" from his stoning. This is
your addition to the account. Also, the account in
Acts says that those who stoned Paul
supposed he was dead, which indicates that they hadn't made certain that he was and mistook his unconsciousness for death. The implication in this is that Paul wasn't, in fact, dead, as his attackers believed. That he regained consciousness and left Iconium has nothing, then, of the miraculous in it. People do this often. Just watch some professional boxing, or MMA fights.
2 Corinthians 11:24-27 - Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one.
Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep;
In journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren;
In weariness and painfulness, in watchings often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often, in cold and nakedness.
The man obviously knew how to receive healing and health from the Lord.
??? Where in this passage does Paul speak of "receiving healing and health from the Lord"? Where does he say he "knew how" to do this? Nowhere. Again, you're inserting
your own ideas into the text and in doing so contorting it and arriving at false conclusions about what it communicates. Paul simply chronicled briefly some of the hardships he faced in service to God. He says not a word about God relieving him of the challenges and afflictions of his service, providing him with health, wealth and happiness instead.
It's very comical that people believe the devil's story about Paul rather than what God's Word says which was the thorn was a messenger of satan, a demon sent by satan to follow Paul around and disrupt His ministry
It's not comical to me how much you're contorting God's word in service to your mistaken belief. As I showed from Paul's own words about his "thorn in
the flesh" (
2 Co. 12:7-10) he was not facing demonic resistance to his work as an apostle of the Early Church but suffering a chronic
physical affliction that made him "weak" in some way. Neither "in the flesh" nor "weak" suggest an external challenge that Paul faced as his "thorn
in the flesh," as you propose. Yes, the physical affliction had a demonic source, but it was nonetheless a physical weakness for Paul that resulted. And God did nothing to relieve the affliction, keeping it in place in order to keep Paul humble and dependent upon Himself (
vs. 7, 9). Nowhere in the passage does Paul say that a demon followed him around disrupting his
ministry. No, instead Paul wrote that the messenger of Satan buffeted
himself directly (
vs. 7). This is all flatly and clearly stated by Paul which makes your reworking of his statement so concerning. I wonder, then, how much of the rest of God's word you treat in the same way, and how off-the-rails doctrinally you are now, as a result. No, there's nothing comical in this, at all.
And so today we see people laying down under the dominion of the devil claiming God is bring the bad things in to their lives just like the devil is leading them to believe
James 1:13 - Let no man say when he is tempted tested or tried, I am tempted tested and tried of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:
Have you not read the book of Job? Goodness. What of the experience of Jesus who, in fulfilling the will of the Father, suffered much opposition, persecution and, finally, death? God did not spare His own Son but directed him to the horrors of the cross in fulfillment of His will. No, you've got the wrong end of the stick about Paul and God, I'm afraid.
Also,
James 1:13 doesn't apply to this matter. It's speaking of temptation, not of the necessary suffering God uses to temper us, teach us and is an unavoidable part of fulfilling His will in an evil world.
Well then by all means, people believing what the devil says should enjoy them some physical suffering!
It's what God's word says, not the devil. You've yet to demonstrate this isn't the case.
You posted your opinion based on your point of view which does not actually reflect God's promises.
Again, this is just unfounded contradiction, not a thoughtful scripturally-careful rebuttal of what I've shown from Scripture. What I've posted is simply what God's word plainly says, not personal opinion.
Those believing what the devil says should enjoy them some physical suffering and quit belly aching about it!
Do you know what a
non sequitur is? What you wrote here is a good example of one. Your characterization of what I've shown from Scripture is also what is called a Strawman. Do you know what this is? I'll tell you this much about them: Both a
non sequitur and a Strawman are fallacious forms of argument. The rest of what you should know about these fallacies you can look up for yourself online.
If it's God's will for people to suffer physically then WHY are they going to the doctor to try and get rid of what God wants them to have???
It doesn't follow that, because God
sometimes afflicts His children physically,
all physical affliction is, therefore, God's doing. Many times, Christians suffer
at their own hands, doing stupid, dangerous, sinful things that cause them (sometimes permanent) harm. At other times, living in an imperfect world means Christians suffer because of the stupidity, carelessness and/or wickedness of others. God is not directly responsible in either of these cases for the afflictions that come upon His children.