Let me ask you this , Who was speaking in Rev2:8 and Rev22:13 ?
Who was dead and has come to life?
Yahweh? Absolutely not.
Jesus.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Let me ask you this , Who was speaking in Rev2:8 and Rev22:13 ?
Across the great chasm between heaven and earth there is only One God. It is only when communicating beyond that dividing point that "us", and terms like "Father" and "Son" exist.So are you saying then that it is neither Jesus nor the Father speaking in Revelation 1:8?
The is the thinking of men, world talk. If you are not open to thinking differently, we're finished, you're finished. But why would you stop following the full trajectory? Many have, just as it is written.As a Jewish monotheist, I‘m committed to always considering Jesus as “the Son of God”. That’s a non-negotiable for me. Jesus is presently sitting at the right hand of his God, the Father. From my perspective, the “My” in your comment is Yahweh and Jesus is at Yahweh’s right hand. I can take that together but I can’t accept that one way of considering Jesus is worse and one way is better.
Across the great chasm between heaven and earth there is only One God. It is only when communicating beyond that dividing point that "us", and terms like "Father" and "Son" exist.
The divide is the divide of many things revealed of God that are not otherwise divided--like (for example) eternity: The gift of eternal life does not mean we all get our own little piece of eternity to stop the clocks from ticking. No, but rather, what could not be divided (eternity)--seemingly impossible, was divided into the incrementalism of time. This is the gift of eternal life. Energy and light from God in the creation resulted in the composition of matter, where eternity divided is time, and space is the manifestation and evidence of the divide--all equaling space, time, and matter.
The terms (and the need for "rightly dividing" them) between matters of heaven and earth, then, is simply a translation between the two different contexts of heaven and earth, "rightly" divided.
To answer your question above-- How would you suppose "time" is "rightly" defined in heaven. The answer regarding Jesus and the Father, is answered the same way: In heaven they are not divided, but One. And only in this world are they divided, just as is true of time vs. eternity.
I have explained the matter for you: such divisions (even as One God being two persons) only exist in this world.Trinitarians and I have been able to agree that it is the Father speaking in Revelation 1:8.
Trinitarians have disagreed with trinitarians and me that it is the Father speaking in Revelation 1:8.
It’s the trinitarians who are divided on the question asked in the OP. I can’t resolve that dispute for the trinitarians.
What I’ve explained to at least one trinitarian is how this particular passage of scripture fits perfectly with the Messiah’s own Jewish monotheism. That is what he asked me to do. (It is my contention that all passages of scripture do agree with his own Jewish monotheism.)
The is the thinking of men, world talk. If you are not open to thinking differently, we're finished …
… you're finished. But why would you stop following the full trajectory? Many have, just as it is written.
I have explained the matter for you: such divisions (even as One God being two persons) only exist in this world.
The Trinity is not wrong for a time, but only for eternity.Jesus and His Father are one when Jesus sits on the throne of his Father becoming subject to him like the scripture says.
To see Jesus is to see Yahweh.
God and Gods Word which he had spoke together again = LORD GOD ALMIGHTY
At least to me in my opinion. *Im not a person who believes in the trinity.
The Trinity is not wrong for a time, but only for eternity.
I don't believe in the trinity. It's just a tradition that is believed on. Believing in it doesn't make one more right with Yahavah/Yahweh.The Trinity is not wrong for a time, but only for eternity.
That is because what was One was divided and then is reunited in the end. That is the full trajectory. One putting His own right hand to a task for a time, does not make for two--except among men, who themselves are divided out of God as Eve was divided out of Adam. Do you understand and know this to be true?The full trajectory is finished in the New Testament. The church gradually went beyond that in subsequent centuries, beginning in the 2nd century.
That is because what was One was divided and then is reunited in the end. That is the full trajectory. One putting His own right hand to a task for a time, does not make for two--except among men, who themselves are divided out of God as Eve was divided out of Adam. Do you understand and know this to be true?
That’s an odd thing for a trinitarian to say.
First off, I am not a "trinitarian."I don't believe in the trinity. It's just a tradition that is believed on. Believing in it doesn't make one more right with Yahavah/Yahweh.
What does make a person right with God ? But faith in his Son. It aint all the other dramaticas.
First off, I am not a "trinitarian."
But what I have been addressing, explains why those who have believed in a Trinity, have not been wrong, but rather only shortsighted. Meaning, they have only considered things according to this world where all is divided out of God--even Christ, just as Eve was divided out of Adam.
Good, that's a start. However, we have been discussing matters regarding both heaven and earth, where exists a divide. Which, whatever ism position you prescribe to, doesn't mean you can deny the hand of God is actually God...that is without denying God. But it goes so much deeper than that--Jesus is a Jewish monotheist. I’m a Jewish monotheist. Jewish monotheists do not believe the one God is divisible.
Good, that's a start.
However, we have been discussing matters regarding both heaven and earth, where exists a divide. Which, whatever ism position you prescribe to, doesn't mean you can deny the hand of God is actually God...that is without denying God. But it goes so much deeper than that--