The foundation of the Premillennialism doctrine is based on some of the most highly debatable scriptures in the entire Bible and not on any clear, straightforward scriptures.
It seems that the two main pillars of Premillennialism are Revelation 20 and Zechariah 14. Any honest person will acknowledge that those are difficult passages to interpret.
Premills assume that what is described in Revelation 20 follows what is described in Revelation 19 chronologically. I believe that they manipulate the rest of the book and the rest of prophetic scripture to fit that assumption. I shouldn't have to convince anyone that the book of Revelation is not all chronological from beginning to end. Revelation 11 and 12 is the most obvious example where it is not written in chronological order. So, to make that assumption about Revelation 19 and 20 is not wise.
Not all Premills interpret Zechariah 14 the same way, but almost all of them use Zechariah 14 as one of their main support passages.
Interpreting Zechariah 14 as relating to a future thousand year earthly kingdom and interpreting it all literally, as many Premills do, creates contradictions with other scripture. These Premills believe in animal sacrifices being reinstated and taking place at a temple which currently does not even exist. This belief blatantly contradicts Hebrews 8-10 which teaches that Christ's once for all sacrifices made animal sacrifices obsolete forever. Animal sacrifices served the purpose of foreshadowing Christ's sacrifice (Hebrews 10:1) and that's it. These Premills typically also use Ezekiel 40-48 to support their view and some of them try to say the animal sacrifices would be done for the purpose of a memorial of Christ's sacrifice even though there is nothing written anywhere in scripture to support that theory. In Ezekiel 45:15-17 it very clearly talks about the animal sacrifices as being done as sin offerings for the atonement and reconciliation of sins. There is no longer any need for any animal sacrifices for that purpose because of Christ's sacrifice, so that can't possibly occur in the future.
Another problem with interpreting Zechariah 14 as relating to a future thousand year earthly millennial kingdom is that this means you believe that people will be required to go to Jerusalem to worship the Lord in the future despite Jesus saying long ago that people no longer had to go to worship God in Jerusalem, but instead were required to worship Him in spirit and in truth wherever they are (John 4:19-24). It makes no sense that God would no longer require that, but then require it again in the future. It makes just as little sense as thinking that animal sacrifices will be reinstated.
Some Premills try to say that the new heavens and new earth are ushered in at the beginning of the thousand years. That is a completely unsupportable position. When the new heavens and new earth are ushered in it will be a place "wherein dwelleth righteousness" (2 Peter 3:13) and where there will be no more sorrow, crying or pain (Revelation 21:4, Isaiah 65:19). And there will be no more death when the new heavens and earth are ushered in (Revelation 21:4). Some try to say there will be death in the new heavens and new earth because of what is written in Isaiah 65:20, but that contradicts what is written in Isaiah 65:19 and in Revelation 21:1-5. In Isaiah 65:19 it talks about no more weeping or crying at that point (just like Revelation 21:4), so to interpret Isaiah 65:20 as saying there would be death at that point would mean no one would cry after they experience extreme pain and no one would cry when a loved one dies and so on, which is obviously completely unreasonable.
So, Premillennialism is based on scriptures like I mentioned above that are highly debatable and are difficult to interpret. Premills often interpret those scriptures in such a way that contradicts other scriptures.
But, the question is, where are the clear, straightforward scriptures that support Premill? It seems that they are nowhere to be found. It makes for a very shaky doctrine when there are no clear scriptures to support it. It's based instead on assumptions, speculation and contradictions.
In the next post I will show how Amillennialism, unlike Premillennialism, is based on clear, straightforward scriptures.
It seems that the two main pillars of Premillennialism are Revelation 20 and Zechariah 14. Any honest person will acknowledge that those are difficult passages to interpret.
Premills assume that what is described in Revelation 20 follows what is described in Revelation 19 chronologically. I believe that they manipulate the rest of the book and the rest of prophetic scripture to fit that assumption. I shouldn't have to convince anyone that the book of Revelation is not all chronological from beginning to end. Revelation 11 and 12 is the most obvious example where it is not written in chronological order. So, to make that assumption about Revelation 19 and 20 is not wise.
Not all Premills interpret Zechariah 14 the same way, but almost all of them use Zechariah 14 as one of their main support passages.
Interpreting Zechariah 14 as relating to a future thousand year earthly kingdom and interpreting it all literally, as many Premills do, creates contradictions with other scripture. These Premills believe in animal sacrifices being reinstated and taking place at a temple which currently does not even exist. This belief blatantly contradicts Hebrews 8-10 which teaches that Christ's once for all sacrifices made animal sacrifices obsolete forever. Animal sacrifices served the purpose of foreshadowing Christ's sacrifice (Hebrews 10:1) and that's it. These Premills typically also use Ezekiel 40-48 to support their view and some of them try to say the animal sacrifices would be done for the purpose of a memorial of Christ's sacrifice even though there is nothing written anywhere in scripture to support that theory. In Ezekiel 45:15-17 it very clearly talks about the animal sacrifices as being done as sin offerings for the atonement and reconciliation of sins. There is no longer any need for any animal sacrifices for that purpose because of Christ's sacrifice, so that can't possibly occur in the future.
Another problem with interpreting Zechariah 14 as relating to a future thousand year earthly millennial kingdom is that this means you believe that people will be required to go to Jerusalem to worship the Lord in the future despite Jesus saying long ago that people no longer had to go to worship God in Jerusalem, but instead were required to worship Him in spirit and in truth wherever they are (John 4:19-24). It makes no sense that God would no longer require that, but then require it again in the future. It makes just as little sense as thinking that animal sacrifices will be reinstated.
Some Premills try to say that the new heavens and new earth are ushered in at the beginning of the thousand years. That is a completely unsupportable position. When the new heavens and new earth are ushered in it will be a place "wherein dwelleth righteousness" (2 Peter 3:13) and where there will be no more sorrow, crying or pain (Revelation 21:4, Isaiah 65:19). And there will be no more death when the new heavens and earth are ushered in (Revelation 21:4). Some try to say there will be death in the new heavens and new earth because of what is written in Isaiah 65:20, but that contradicts what is written in Isaiah 65:19 and in Revelation 21:1-5. In Isaiah 65:19 it talks about no more weeping or crying at that point (just like Revelation 21:4), so to interpret Isaiah 65:20 as saying there would be death at that point would mean no one would cry after they experience extreme pain and no one would cry when a loved one dies and so on, which is obviously completely unreasonable.
So, Premillennialism is based on scriptures like I mentioned above that are highly debatable and are difficult to interpret. Premills often interpret those scriptures in such a way that contradicts other scriptures.
But, the question is, where are the clear, straightforward scriptures that support Premill? It seems that they are nowhere to be found. It makes for a very shaky doctrine when there are no clear scriptures to support it. It's based instead on assumptions, speculation and contradictions.
In the next post I will show how Amillennialism, unlike Premillennialism, is based on clear, straightforward scriptures.
Last edited: