• Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I will keep the truth coming.
You have to start teaching the truth in order to keep it coming. When do you plan to start?

Really... I do not think you really have considered everything to truly understand what was written.
I do not think I care what you think. You are wrong.

You need to compare Scripture with Scripture.
How funny. I've made the same point to you several times. I'm still waiting for you to do so.

Mat 4:1
(1) Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil.

Rev 17:3
(3) So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.

What do you think about how John was carried away in the spirit into the wilderness? Why did the Spirit specifically take John to the wilderness where the woman and the beast can be found? What wilderness is this?

Something for you to think carefully.
You need to think carefully about the fact that the book of Revelation is the most highly symbolic book in all of scripture while there is nothing whatsoever in Matthew 4 to indicate that Jesus was speaking symbolically there. If you deny that He was literally in the wilderness, then, to be consistent, you'd also have to deny that He literally fasted for 40 days and nights in the wilderness and that He did not literally say that He was hungry afterwards. Do you deny all of that?

Unlike a natural man like you, I already has one.

1Co 2:13-14
(13) Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
(14) But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
You already "has" what? I said you need to ask God for wisdom.
 

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
16,392
8,944
113
50
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
What part would that be?

Ezekiel 28:12 (KJV) Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.
Eze 28:12-14
‘You were the seal of perfection,
full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
You were in Eden,
the garden of God.
Every kind of precious stone adorned you:
ruby, topaz, and diamond,
beryl, onyx, and jasper,
sapphire, turquoise, and emerald.
Your mountings and settings were crafted in gold,
prepared on the day of your creation.
You were anointed as a guardian cherub,
for I had ordained you.
You were on the holy mountain of God;
you walked among the fiery stones.
 

David in NJ

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2021
16,392
8,944
113
50
Denville
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Genesis 6:5 (KJV) And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

Matthew 15:19-20 (KJV) For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies: These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man.

Mark 7:21-23 (KJV) For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.
Where did the wickedness of men come from???
 

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
11,091
5,914
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
It's as though the serpent is man's conscience, that in the beginning knew neither good nor evil. But still a part of man whom God created "very good." Did our conscience become enticed to disobey God through lust of the flesh, we saw something forbidden that looked really good, and our desire to be as God? The serpent it defined as a snake, but comes from a primitive root defined - properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate:—× certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) × enchantment, learn by experience, × indeed, diligently observe. Interesting!
So Satan is not a real evil angel or being, he is abstract conscience?
 

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
11,091
5,914
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
For many who do not fully understand who the Serpent truly is, there is great confusion about how it deceived Eve. Most people assume the Serpent was “Lucifer,” a fallen angel who was once in Heaven until iniquity was found in him, and that he was then cast down to earth where he became the Serpent—also called Satan. Then had a one on one conversation with Eve. But that is not the case!

It is their result of no study of Scripture because the doctrine is inconsistent and contradictory at every turn. It's in total disharmony with everything else in the Bible. The Serpent was cursed to symbolize the unclean spirit of man. That's why God told Israel they were forbidden to eat whatsoever goes about upon the belly (Leviticus 11:42) because that represented an unclean animal, signifying unsaved man (Acts 10:14; Acts 10:28; etc.)! When we become saved, God has cleansed what was once unclean in the Spirit of Christ.

Micah 7:16-17
  • "The nations shall see and be confounded at all their might: they shall lay their hand upon their mouth, their ears shall be deaf.
  • They shall lick the dust like a serpent, they shall move out of their holes like worms of the earth: they shall be afraid of the LORD our God, and shall fear because of thee."
They lick the dust like a serpent because they have that cursed unclean spirit. Here is the Serpent God cursed in Genesis to go upon its belly that the dust should be its food all the days of thy life! It's unsaved man that is at enmity with the Woman! Likewise God called the Serpent subtil because the mind is a crafty and cunning part of mankind. It is what rationalizes away dishonesty, lawlessness and disobedience. This is why the Serpent in the Garden was called wily or subtil (cunning, crafty). Sin starts in the deep recesses of the mind through the spirit eyes of justification and rationalization.

2nd Corinthians 11:3

  • "But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, SO your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ."
For example, SO, or [houto] "in-this manner" the mind is corrupted. Selah! In other words, that's the way it is corrupted. The serpent worked within Eve's mind! It wasn't fallen angelic being or a talking snake on the tree like the cheshire cat, it was her own spirit in lust that fells into corruption and leads her (and us) astray (James chapter 1).

Moreover see in this passage that the Apostle equates the Serpent beguiling or deceiving Eve to corruption of the mind from simplicity!! Same scenario we see again of the corruption beginning in the mind's eye and leading to sin. Consistently we see the same portrait of the working of sin. The carnal lust Eve had came from the corruption in her mind so that mankind lost that virgin purity through their own lust. Not through a fallen angel from heaven as many people thought. Rather it is her own mind was corrupted by her own lust, therefore she was deceived right there! Her sin began BEFORE she actually bit the fruit. The physical act of eating was the outward expression of the inward corruption that had already taken place in her mind.

Gen 3:6
  • And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
Notice the three stages:
  1. "Saw that the tree was good for food" = lust of the flesh.
  2. "Pleasant to the eyes" = lust of the eyes.
  3. "Desired to make one wise" = pride of life
Those are the SAME THREE CATEGORIES OF TEMPTATION John warns about:

1Jn 2:16
  • For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
Therefore, before Eve bit the fruit, her desire had ALREADY turned against God's command. Her own rebellious spirit has corrupted her mind, and her heart agreed with it, and her will followed through. She was deceived by her own spirit.

1Ti 2:13-14
  • For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
  • And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
You are doing a lot of ducking around some simple questions.
  • Do you believe that demons or demonic spirits are real?
  • Do you believe they are fallen angels?
  • Do you believe that the angels who fell with Satan at the beginning are demons who possess certain wicked who leave themselves open to demonic control?
  • Do you believe in the existence of an evil, supernatural spirit being named Satan?
  • Do you accept that evil spirits/demons are evil angels that exist like Satan does?
  • Or, is Satan abstract "conscience" or the innate "evil spirit" of unregenerate man?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: David in NJ

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,707
951
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
You have to start teaching the truth in order to keep it coming. When do you plan to start?

Already did. :-)

I do not think I care what you think. You are wrong.

Ahhh...thought so, no point to explain things to you further then after this post. :-)

How funny. I've made the same point to you several times. I'm still waiting for you to do so.

I did. You did not like what you read.

You need to think carefully about the fact that the book of Revelation is the most highly symbolic book in all of scripture while there is nothing whatsoever in Matthew 4 to indicate that Jesus was speaking symbolically there. If you deny that He was literally in the wilderness, then, to be consistent, you'd also have to deny that He literally fasted for 40 days and nights in the wilderness and that He did not literally say that He was hungry afterwards. Do you deny all of that?

Sigh… It’s all symbolic!

It began with the phrase “led up of the Spirit.” The Spirit is the active agent here — God’s Spirit directing the entire experience, just as He did with the prophets when they were carried into visions.

Then we read that Jesus fasted forty days and became hungry. But that hunger wasn’t merely physical — it symbolized a spiritual longing, a deep desire to be sustained by the Word of God. Jesus confirmed this Himself in verse 4:

Matthew 4:4
  • But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
The message is clear: the true test wasn’t about food — it was about faith, dependence, and obedience to God’s Word. The wilderness scene is a spiritual lesson for our understanding, not a record of a physical contest with some supernatural being daring Christ to turn stones into French bread.


It’s a prophetic vision and a teaching moment, revealing how the Spirit leads us into spiritual testing so that we might learn to live by every word from God.

Still stuck with your natural man, aren’t you? Fine — then explain this:

If you insist it was literal, then tell me how the devil supposedly took Christ from the wilderness to the holy city and set Him on the pinnacle of the temple. Did that actually happen physically? Really?

And what about the next part — when “the devil taketh Him up into an exceeding high mountain” and “showeth Him all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them”?

What high mountain is this? Was there some literal mountain high enough in the literal wilderness somewhere in Judea for Jesus to see every kingdom of the world from one spot? Impossible!

So which is it? Did the devil physically transport Christ from the wilderness to the temple, then back to the mountaintop, and then back to the wilderness again — all in His starving human body? Or was this clearly a spiritual vision and symbolic test, directed by the Spirit of God, revealing truth through imagery, not geography?

You already "has" what? I said you need to ask God for wisdom.

What do you think?? Wisdom?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rwb

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
So Satan is not a real evil angel or being, he is abstract conscience?
That's what Satan wants people to believe. It's easier for him to deceive people if they don't believe he exists. There's no reason to watch out for his deceptive tricks if you don't believe he exists. I wonder what these guys think of a passage like this...

Ephesians 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. 11 Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. 13 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

Do they think Paul is saying to put on the whole armor of God in order to stand against your own conscience? What do they make up Ephesians 6:12? Do they not believe that there are non-flesh and blood, but real "principalities", "powers", "rulers of the darkness of this age" and "spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places"? Or do they think that "spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places" are men's consciences? I just don't get it. Scripture is very clear about the existence of a real spirit being named Satan and real evil spirit beings called demons who can possess, oppress and deceive people. How can anyone think otherwise? It boggles my mind.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: David in NJ and WPM

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You are doing a lot of ducking around some simple questions.
Not sure why he is ducking them since he has addressed what he believes about these things several times before. I can answer these questions for him based on what he has said before.

  • Do you believe that demons or demonic spirits are real?
No, he does not.

  • Do you believe they are fallen angels?
He does not believe in the existence of angels at all.

  • Do you believe that the angels who fell with Satan at the beginning are demons who possess certain wicked who leave themselves open to demonic control?
Again, he doesn't believe in the existence of angels at all. He thinks the references to angels in scripture are to human messengers.

  • Do you believe in the existence of an evil, supernatural spirit being named Satan?
No, he does not.

  • Do you accept that evil spirits/demons are evil angels that exist like Satan does?
No, he does not.

  • Or, is Satan abstract conscience?
He says that the term Satan represents the spirit of man which is naturally evil. So, I wonder how the spirit of man was talking to God about Job and talking to Jesus in the wilderness after He fasted there for 40 days and nights?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: WPM

WPM

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2022
11,091
5,914
113
USA
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
That's what Satan wants people to believe. It's easier for him to deceive people if they don't believe he exists. There's no reason to watch out for his deceptive tricks if you don't believe he exists. I wonder what these guys think of a passage like this...

Ephesians 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. 11 Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. 13 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

Do they think Paul is saying to put on the whole armor of God in order to stand against your own conscience? What do they make up Ephesians 6:12? Do they not believe that there are non-flesh and blood, but real "principalities", "powers", "rulers of the darkness of this age" and "spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places"? Or do they think that "spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places" are men's consciences? I just don't get it. Scripture is very clear about the existence of a real spirit being named Satan and real evil spirit beings called demons who can possess, oppress and deceive people. How can anyone think otherwise? It boggles my mind.
I totally agree.
 
Last edited:

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Already did. :-)
When and where? I guess everyone missed it.

Ahhh...thought so, no point to explain things to you further then after this post. :-)
You mean you didn't somehow already know that I don't care what you think about this? I thought I was making that clear. The only thing you have explained is how little discernment you have regarding this topic.

Sigh… It’s all symbolic!
Wow! Unbelievable! You deny it all! Shameful stuff! You are 100% wrong. Jesus did indeed literally fast in the wilderness for 40 days and nights while showing how it was possible to live while relying only on the Holy Spirit for provision. Why does it say He was hungry after 40 days and nights if He didn't literally fast in the wilderness? What would Him being hungry symbolize? LOL. What a joke. I hope you respond and tell me that you're joking about this and we can have a good laugh about the prank you pulled on me. I just can't believe anyone can believe this nonsense.

It began with the phrase “led up of the Spirit.” The Spirit is the active agent here — God’s Spirit directing the entire experience, just as He did with the prophets when they were carried into visions.

Then we read that Jesus fasted forty days and became hungry. But that hunger wasn’t merely physical — it symbolized a spiritual longing, a deep desire to be sustained by the Word of God. Jesus confirmed this Himself in verse 4:

Matthew 4:4
  • But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
The message is clear: the true test wasn’t about food — it was about faith, dependence, and obedience to God’s Word. The wilderness scene is a spiritual lesson for our understanding, not a record of a physical contest with some supernatural being daring Christ to turn stones into French bread.
LOL. There it is. You do think His hunger was symbolic. Unbelievable.

So what about the verse right before that one?

Matthew 4:3 Now when the tempter came to Him, he said, “If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread.”

So, your claim is that no one actually said this to Jesus, right? And that Jesus didn't actually say what He is quoted as saying in response? It's all just made up to teach a lesson? LOL. No. Yes, there are lessons to be learned from this event, but it really happened. You make a joke out of Jesus literally showing people what is possible when relying entirely on God. The fact that He literally did fast in the wilderness for 40 days and nights and literally did respond to Satan's twisting of scripture by quoting the real meaning of scripture makes this account far more meaningful and powerful than your belief that it's all just made up and all symbolism.

It’s a prophetic vision and a teaching moment, revealing how the Spirit leads us into spiritual testing so that we might learn to live by every word from God.

Still stuck with your natural man, aren’t you?
Says the one who thinks like the natural man rather than using spiritual discernment.

Fine — then explain this:

If you insist it was literal, then tell me how the devil supposedly took Christ from the wilderness to the holy city and set Him on the pinnacle of the temple. Did that actually happen physically? Really?
Sure. Why not? Is this all you have to try to rebuke my claim? It's not like this would have been something impossible to do.

And what about the next part — when “the devil taketh Him up into an exceeding high mountain” and “showeth Him all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them”?

What high mountain is this? Was there some literal mountain high enough in the literal wilderness somewhere in Judea for Jesus to see every kingdom of the world from one spot? Impossible!

So which is it? Did the devil physically transport Christ from the wilderness to the temple, then back to the mountaintop, and then back to the wilderness again — all in His starving human body? Or was this clearly a spiritual vision and symbolic test, directed by the Spirit of God, revealing truth through imagery, not geography?
Regardless of whether it was a literal, physical mountain or if it was a vision given by the Spirit of all the kingdoms of the world, it doesn't change the fact that this was a literal encounter that Jesus had with someone called "the devil" and "Satan". He wasn't talking to the spirit of man, He was talking to an actual being named Satan. To deny that Jesus literally said the things that He is recorded as saying is utterly ridiculous. You are trying to do whatever you can to get around that, but it can't be done. It doesn't matter if it was a literal mountain or not. That's beside the point. Satan wasn't just making it up that he had the ability to offer those kingdoms to Jesus in exchange for His worship. And Jesus really did literally say in response "You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve".

Matthew 4:8 Again, the devil took Him up on an exceedingly high mountain, and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. 9 And he said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.” 10 Then Jesus said to him, “Away with you, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.’ ” 11 Then the devil left Him, and behold, angels came and ministered to Him.

Do you claim that Jesus didn't literally tell the devil, Satan, to leave Him? Do you deny that the angels literally came to minister to Him? If so, you are denying what the text clearly indicates. If Jesus telling Satan to get away from Him isn't meant to be taken literally, then what does that symbolize? If the devil didn't literally leave Him, then what does that symbolize? If the angels didn't literally come and minister to Him, then what does that symbolize? Why do you try to symbolize as much of the Bible as you possibly can? I wonder if you even understand what literal reality is.

What do you think?? Wisdom?
You said you "has" one. You "has" (the word is "have", man) one wisdom?
 
Last edited:

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I will keep the truth coming.
What is the truth taught in this passage...

Ephesians 6:10 Ephesians 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. 11 Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. 13 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

You say the devil, Satan, represents the spirit of man, right? So, you think that verse 11 above is talking about putting on the whole armor of God in order to stand against the wiles of your own spirit? Paul said we do not wrestle against flesh and blood human beings, so how could he have been saying that we have to stand against the wiles of our own spirits? And he said that, instead being against flesh and blood human beings, our spiritual battle is "against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places". So, you think that "principalities", "powers", "the rulers of the darkness of this age" and "spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places" represent the spirit of man? That can't be since Paul specifically said our battle is not against flesh and blood human beings. Instead, it's against evil spirit beings like Satan and his angels.
 

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,707
951
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Wow! Unbelievable! You deny it all! Shameful stuff! You are 100% wrong. Jesus did indeed literally fast in the wilderness for 40 days and nights while showing how it was possible to live while relying only on the Holy Spirit for provision. Why does it say He was hungry after 40 days and nights if He didn't literally fast in the wilderness? What would Him being hungry symbolize? LOL. What a joke. I hope you respond and tell me that you're joking about this and we can have a good laugh about the prank you pulled on me. I just can't believe anyone can believe this nonsense.

You don't get it. I guess that part, "Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil. " that confuses you. I will leave it at that.

Matthew 4:8 Again, the devil took Him up on an exceedingly high mountain, and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. 9 And he said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.” 10 Then Jesus said to him, “Away with you, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.’ ” 11 Then the devil left Him, and behold, angels came and ministered to Him.

Do you claim that Jesus didn't literally tell the devil, Satan, to leave Him? Do you deny that the angels literally came to minister to Him? If so, you are denying what the text clearly indicates. If Jesus telling Satan to get away from Him isn't meant to be taken literally, then what does that symbolize? If the devil didn't literally leave Him, then what does that symbolize? If the angels didn't literally come and minister to Him, then what does that symbolize? Why do you try to symbolize as much of the Bible as you possibly can? I wonder if you even understand what literal reality is.

Like you, a lot of Christians "assume" they are angelic beings "as if" that's what the actual text of the Scriptures say. But according to the "actual text" of that verse, when the Devil left, messengers came and ministered unto Him. There is NOT one word there about angelic beings from heaven "despite" what the translators injected into it! Comparing Scripture with Scripture, we can see clearly who the rest of the Bible says ministered to Christ, and it wasn't angelic beings! Shocking! The Greek word διακονέω or [diakoneo] is mentioned approximately 36 times in the New Testament Scriptures and it always refers to human ministers, and not once is it used to refer to a heavenly angelic being! Period. So why would we think it is used that way in Matthew chapter 4 verse 11? Do not interpretations belong to God through our comparing Scripture with Scripture, considering the actual words? Why would the man Jesus Christ need to be ministered to by supernatural angelic beings? What's for? Was He not still fully God and fully man with all power in His hands, wasn't he? Isn't it more believable that the saints came and ministered to him as they had been doing before this? And is this not all done as a Spiritual picture puzzle, a cryptic portrait of the trial or testing that Christ as a man was put through for our knowledge, understanding, and benefit? Hello? For example, the Devil tempts or tests Him, Christ rebukes him with Scripture, the Devil defeated thereby leaves, and the messengers minister to Him that has overcome the adversary. What part of this is of the purview, scope, business, influence, or concern of supernatural angelic beings? The body of Christ is ministered to by the saints.

Matthew 4:11

  • "Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him."
Matthew 8:14-15
  • "And when Jesus was come into Peter's house, he saw his wife's mother laid, and sick of a fever.
  • And he touched her hand, and the fever left her: and she arose, and ministered unto them."
Mark 15:40-41
  • "There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome;
  • (Who also, when he was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him;) and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem."
Question: What's the difference between those ministering to Christ in these three verses and the "messenger" ministering to Him in Matthew chapter 4?

Answer: There is no difference! This is the word messenger and the same word ministering to Him--thus there is no difference.

They were all human ministers. Just observe the context. So yes, Christ was in the wilderness, the desert place and had fasted for "forty days and forty nights," and after this of course He was hungry. All of these have historical occurrence but have spiritual signification for our learning! Anyway, so are we to "assume" that supernatural heavenly beings came and ministered to or served him by providing Him food and water? Or do we receive what is written, that messengers of God came and did this? As a man He didn't need spiritual food and drink, but human food and drink which was always provided by human messengers. The messengers of God that we read ministered to Christ all throughout His ministry. Even as Scripture tells us that the messengers of God are all "ministering spirits" sent forth to serve. That's their nature to be an attendant and to wait upon or serve. There is nothing unusual at all about that verse and certainly nothing that screams "supernatural beings" from heaven needed unless we inject that into the very understandable word "messenger" through eisegesis. But why would we do that?

Numbers 24:12-13
  • "And Balaam said unto Balak, Spake I not also to thy messengers which thou sentest unto me, saying,
  • If Balak would give me his house full of silver and gold, I cannot go beyond the commandment of the LORD, to do either good or bad of mine own mind; but what the LORD saith, that will I speak?"
And the Lord "hath not said" that these are supernatural angelic beings doing Lord knows what To Christ. Man said it and he attempts to justify it by logistical diffusion in diluting the empirical evidence of what has actually been said. Or to put it another way, "assumption is the mother of errors," as I often said!
 
  • Like
Reactions: rwb

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Eze 28:12-14
‘You were the seal of perfection,
full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
You were in Eden,
the garden of God.
Every kind of precious stone adorned you:
ruby, topaz, and diamond,
beryl, onyx, and jasper,
sapphire, turquoise, and emerald.
Your mountings and settings were crafted in gold,
prepared on the day of your creation.
You were anointed as a guardian cherub,
for I had ordained you.
You were on the holy mountain of God;
you walked among the fiery stones.

The lamentation is directed to king Tyrus, not to a spirit being, but to a human being! Tyrus is indeed showing that he is under the influence of evil. Though he was not literally in the garden of God in the beginning, through the seed of evil in his heart and mind, spiritually, he was. From the foundation of the world Tyrus, like Adam and Eve gave himself over to evil. Mankind was the seal of perfection when God created them. Being anointed as a guardian cherub. Cherubim are NOT angels. They are defined as an imaginary figure. God placed cherubim and a flaming sword to keep the way of the tree of life. Man was to be guardian of the garden of Eden to dress and keep it. But man, through Adam & Eve, all humanity has fallen into sin and all manner of evil, as we find in their offspring, king Tyrus. It was for this cause that Tyrus's heart was lifted up, and like his first parents determined to become as God.

Genesis 3:24 (KJV) So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.

Genesis 2:15 (KJV)
And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Where did the wickedness of men come from???

I've already shown you once, here again are some verses that tell us where evil and wickedness in man comes from.

Genesis 6:5 (KJV) And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

Matthew 15:19-20 (KJV)
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies: These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man.

Mark 7:21-23 (KJV)
For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.
 

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2023
2,707
951
113
56
Somewhere west of Mississippi River
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What is the truth taught in this passage...

Ephesians 6:10 Ephesians 6:10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. 11 Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. 13 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

You say the devil, Satan, represents the spirit of man, right? So, you think that verse 11 above is talking about putting on the whole armor of God in order to stand against the wiles of your own spirit? Paul said we do not wrestle against flesh and blood human beings, so how could he have been saying that we have to stand against the wiles of our own spirits? And he said that, instead being against flesh and blood human beings, our spiritual battle is "against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places". So, you think that "principalities", "powers", "the rulers of the darkness of this age" and "spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places" represent the spirit of man? That can't be since Paul specifically said our battle is not against flesh and blood human beings. Instead, it's against evil spirit beings like Satan and his angels.

You misunderstood. Not "evil spirit beings."

But against men who possess the spirit of Satan—false messengers who disguise themselves as “ministers of light.” That is who the true Church has been contending with since Pentecost: deceivers, false apostles, and corrupt teachers striving to take control of Christ’s kingdom (the Church).

These men are the “rulers of the darkness of this world”—as satanic kings of the earth who operate under their spirit of rebellion. Many professing Christians, blind and deluded, still perceive them as genuine children of light. Yet they are the same “spiritual wickedness in high places” that Paul warned about.

Our warfare is spiritual, not physical—yet the battle is against men animated by a dark spirit, not against invisible creatures floating in the air. Just as the Holy Spirit works through godly men, so the spirit of Satan works through ungodly men. It is the war of two spiritual kingdoms—the spirit of truth versus the spirit of opposite, the elect versus the apostate.

That is why Paul exhorted:

Ephesians 6:11–12
  • Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
    For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Paul was not speaking of invisible supernatural devil and demons in their kingdom somewhere in the sky or under the Earth but of men in high spiritual offices—those who rule by their own spirit of disobedience, the same kind who led Israel astray in Christ’s day.

As Christians, we have always contended with these men for control of the Kingdom of God on earth—that is, the Church. The wicked have not yet fully possessed this kingdom, because the spirit of Satan has been restrained by God’s sovereign hand. His restraint prevents the forces of deception from completely overtaking the Church until every one of the Elect is secured in Christ.

But when that restraint is lifted—when the spirit of Satan ascends out of the bottomless pit—meaning the spirit of false prophets and false christs will multiply or increase, just as our Lord warned in Matthew 24.

Mat 24:11
  • And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
This is the moment that Satan will deceive the world now that all Elect has been secured. At that time, the power of deception will reach its height, and these men, under the spirit of Satan, will be able to wage spiritual war and overcome the saints and rule the visible church. The power of the Holy People for the purpose of salvation shall be broken. That is when the wicked men will begin to rule God's kingdom for a short season. It will appear as though the darkness has prevailed, but only for a short season—until Christ returns to reclaim His kingdom from the hands of the deceivers.

The bodies of the beast and the false prophets (second beast) are unsaved people of the world and of God's congregation who will be thrown into the Lake of fire along with their spirit, (Satan, Dragon, Devil), will be also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rwb

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You don't get it. I guess that part, "Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil. " that confuses you. I will leave it at that.
You don't get it. He really fasted for 40 days and nights, He was really tempted by the devil and the devil really did say what he is recorded as saying and Jesus really did say what He is recorded as saying. To say the whole thing is basically made up like a parable and is all symbolic is completely ridiculous.

Like you, a lot of Christians "assume" they are angelic beings "as if" that's what the actual text of the Scriptures say. But according to the "actual text" of that verse, when the Devil left, messengers came and ministered unto Him.
Who is the devil that left Him if not a real living being? How can a non-living being tempt Him and then leave Him after He tells him to go away? And who are the messengers who came and ministered to Him, if not angels? How could human beings minister to Jesus when He was the One to minister to them?

There is NOT one word there about angelic beings from heaven "despite" what the translators injected into it!
Ah, yes. Somehow, all English translators are wrong and you are right. Okay.

Comparing Scripture with Scripture, we can see clearly who the rest of the Bible says ministered to Christ, and it wasn't angelic beings! Shocking!
What are you talking about? Where does it say that anyone but angels ever ministered to Christ?

The Greek word διακονέω or [diakoneo] is mentioned approximately 36 times in the New Testament Scriptures and it always refers to human ministers, and not once is it used to refer to a heavenly angelic being! Period.
You continue to display your extreme ignorance. The Greek word translated as angels in the verse in question is angelos and it is used in this verse.

Matthew 1:20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel (Greek: angelos) of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.

How could a human have appeared to Joseph in a dream while giving him a message about Mary? It's not possible. But, an angel could do that.

So why would we think it is used that way in Matthew chapter 4 verse 11?
It's used the way it is in many other verses, which is in reference to angels. The verse I showed above is just one example of verses which use that word in a way that can't possibly refer to human beings.

Do not interpretations belong to God through our comparing Scripture with Scripture, considering the actual words?
Yes, so why did you not reference the actual Greek word that is translated as "angels" in Matthew 4:11 while looking at how it is used in other verses? You just make claims without bothering to show any examples and expect me to take your word for it. I'd never take your word for anything.

Why would the man Jesus Christ need to be ministered to by supernatural angelic beings? What's for?
Because He was physically hungry after not having eaten for 40 days and nights and He was mentally and spiritually exhausted after dealing with Satan's temptations and his twisting of scripture. Notice how He demanded Satan to get away from Him. He couldn't stand his nonsense any longer and the human part of Him was exhausted from it all and His hunger must have been overwhelming at that point.

Was He not still fully God and fully man with all power in His hands, wasn't he?
Yes, but He did not always exercise His power because He wanted to relate to man. You are seeming to ignore the "fully man" part of Jesus here. He experienced pain, hunger, sadness, anger and so on just like we do.

Philippians 2:5 Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, 7 but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross.

Though Jesus is God, while as a man on earth He "made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men.". So, He experienced physical weakness, mental exhaustion and things like that which all people experience. So, the angels ministered to His human side.

Isn't it more believable that the saints came and ministered to him as they had been doing before this?
What saints are you talking about and how did they minister to Him exactly?

And is this not all done as a Spiritual picture puzzle, a cryptic portrait of the trial or testing that Christ as a man was put through for our knowledge, understanding, and benefit? Hello? For example, the Devil tempts or tests Him, Christ rebukes him with Scripture, the Devil defeated thereby leaves, and the messengers minister to Him that has overcome the adversary. What part of this is of the purview, scope, business, influence, or concern of supernatural angelic beings?
What part of that is there any indication that did not literally happen? You expect me to believe that all the things that the devil is quoted as saying and all the things that Jesus is quoted as saying were not actually literally said and Jesus just made those things up to teach a moral lesson? Considering how Jesus had to constantly correct His disciples and minister to them, how do you figure that human beings are the ones who came to minister to them? Who do you say they were? His disciples? The ones who fell asleep when they were supposed to be watching out for the ones who were going to come and kill Him? They would be the ones to come and help Him recover from what He had gone through?

Matthew 4:11
  • "Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him."
Matthew 8:14-15
  • "And when Jesus was come into Peter's house, he saw his wife's mother laid, and sick of a fever.
  • And he touched her hand, and the fever left her: and she arose, and ministered unto them."
Mark 15:40-41
  • "There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome;
  • (Who also, when he was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him;) and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem."
Question: What's the difference between those ministering to Christ in these three verses and the "messenger" ministering to Him in Matthew chapter 4?
Context, man. Are those passages talking about people ministering unto Jesus after He had just been through a major ordeal like not eating for 40 days and nights and being tempted by the devil? He need a special level of ministering after that which no humans could provide.

Answer: There is no difference! This is the word messenger and the same word ministering to Him--thus there is no difference.
There is a huge difference! To act as if women being hospitable to Him is no different than ministering to Him after going through 40 days and nights of not eating and then being tempted while being hungry and exhausted is utterly ridiculous.

They were all human ministers. Just observe the context. So yes, Christ was in the wilderness, the desert place and had fasted for "forty days and forty nights," and after this of course He was hungry.
Wait a minute. Are you now saying that He literally fasted for 40 days and nights and was literally hungry afterwards? Before, you said the whole thing was symbolic. Why are you so selective in acknowledging that He literally fasted in the wilderness for 40 days and nights and was literally hungry while denying that a literal being called the devil and Satan tempted Him at that time? You are clearly twisting the text to make it fit your beliefs.
 
Last edited:

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
So Satan is not a real evil angel or being, he is abstract conscience?

The Bible certainly seems to show him as real, and evil, in fact a murderer from the beginning, and father of lies. But the Bible never says he was an angel of God who fell. He was created for evil from the beginning.

Genesis 3:1 (KJV) Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Serpent - defined as a snake, which comes from H5172 - נָחַשׁ nâchash, naw-khash' a primitive root; properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate:—× certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) × enchantment, learn by experience, × indeed, diligently observe.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You misunderstood. Not "evil spirit beings."

But against men who possess the spirit of Satan—false messengers who disguise themselves as “ministers of light.” That is who the true Church has been contending with since Pentecost: deceivers, false apostles, and corrupt teachers striving to take control of Christ’s kingdom (the Church).
You are blatantly contradicting what Paul said. He said "For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood". That means we don't wrestle (spiritually battle against) flesh and blood humans. But, here you are saying we wrestle (battle spiritually) against flesh and blood humans. No, we put on the whole armor of God against the evil spirits who influence and deceive people.

I can't even believe you have no understanding of spiritual things. You don't even know about the spiritual warfare going on around us. There was the demon-possessed man that answered "Legion, for we are many" when Jesus asked his name, and you can't even discern that it can't possibly have been talking about the spirit of the man since he was just one man, and yet had many spirits in him. They were evil spirit beings called demons and they asked to be sent into the swine when Jesus cast them out of the demon-possessed man. You have no explanation for that with your contention that demons supposedly represent the spirit of man. One man would only have one spirit, yet that demon-possessed man had many spirits in him, showing it wasn't talking about his spirit. You have no way around that. And why would Jesus cast out the man's spirit? Obviously, He wouldn't do that. You just have no clue about what these scriptures mean.
 

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
The Bible certainly seems to show him as real, and evil, in fact a murderer from the beginning, and father of lies.
TribulationSigns denies that and that's why it concerns me when I see you agreeing with his posts where he expresses his belief that Satan and demons are not real, evil spirit beings.

But the Bible never says he was an angel of God who fell. He was created for evil from the beginning.
Where does the Bible teach that he was created for evil from the beginning?

Genesis 3:1 (KJV) Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Serpent - defined as a snake, which comes from H5172 - נָחַשׁ nâchash, naw-khash' a primitive root; properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate:—× certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) × enchantment, learn by experience, × indeed, diligently observe.
The word "subtil" or "subtle" does not necessarily mean evil. It just means not easily noticeable. So, I don't think that verse supports your point here. Satan was compared to a serpent, not because serpents are evil, but because they are subtle in their movements and not easily noticeable, so that describes how Satan deceives people.
 

rwb

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2022
5,722
2,482
113
74
Branson
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Where does the Bible teach that he was created for evil from the beginning?
John 8:44 (KJV) Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

The word "subtil" or "subtle" does not necessarily mean evil. It just means not easily noticeable. So, I don't think that verse supports your point here. Satan was compared to a serpent, not because serpents are evil, but because they are subtle in their movements and not easily noticeable, so that describes how Satan deceives people.

The serpent as representative of evil and wickedness is called the tempter being ordained by God from the beginning to test Adam & Eve, knowing it would bring sin and death through sin into creation.

Genesis 3:1 (KJV) Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

Serpent - defined as a snake, which comes from H5172 - נָחַשׁ nâchash, naw-khash' a primitive root; properly, to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; generally, to prognosticate:—× certainly, divine, enchanter, (use) × enchantment, learn by experience, × indeed, diligently observe.