Hiddenthings
Well-Known Member
And yet you still believe in mysteries?On the contrary, what comes is "all truth" and "every hidden thing revealed", wherein the law of God is "fulfilled."
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And yet you still believe in mysteries?On the contrary, what comes is "all truth" and "every hidden thing revealed", wherein the law of God is "fulfilled."
Rev. 20:1 Interlinear - Revelation 20:1 Interlinear: And I saw a messenger coming down out of the heaven, having the key of the abyss, and a great chain over his hand,
There are words to consider in this text. Words for discussion:
- "And I saw"
- "an angel"
- "come down from heaven"
- "having the key"
- "the key of the bottomless pit"
- "bottomless pit"
- "a great chain"
- "in his hand"
What I see is a literal angel coming from heaven to Earth to perform some tasks. He possesses two forms of control and constraint, a key to a lock of some kind (likely not exactly like human locks but a lock nonetheless) which locks a sealed pit/prison of some kind, and a chain which I feel wraps around a person to completely incapacitate rather than a dog tied to a tree concept.
Neither Jesus or the gospel does any of this. It is an angel that does this and is similar in action to other things angels do in Rev.
No, that mystery that is written that was sealed and not to be revealed until the end, is now revealed--this I do not "believe", but know.And yet you still believe in mysteries?
I'm a little concerned that whatever I offer will either be designated "symbolic", or a metaphor for a cherished false doctrine. Nevertheless, you asked, ,so.@Brakelite
I’m not sure if you’re still active on the forum, but could you clarify whether Advent’s teaching aligns with standard Seventh-day Adventist doctrine? I may be mistaken, but my understanding was that Adventists believe in the second coming of Christ to the earth i.e at the beginning of his reign. From what I can see, however, Advent seems to be teaching that Christ and the saints are in heaven during the 1,000-year reign. That position appears untenable to me on the basis of Scripture. I’d appreciate your comment. Thanks.
(true)In Revelation 19:10, the presiding angel is associated with the Redeemed
False. In Hebrews 1:14 angels are being described as ministering spirits sent to minister to those who are the heirs of salvation (humans).who, in the days of their glory, will not only be “equal unto the angels” (Luke 20:36) but will also assume responsibility for administering affairs currently managed by the angels under the guidance of the Lord Jesus Christ (Hebrews 1:14; 2:5; 1 Peter 3:22).
.. etc etc. It's all just part truth mixed with unsubstantiated assertions based on opinions, based on personal doctrine that is not based on correctly interpreting scripture.(It is important to recognize that, up to this point in time (the beginning of the 1000 year period), no one has yet been glorified or made a Saint of the Living God; all the Elect, as well as the responsible lost, remain in the sleep of death (dust), awaiting the resurrection.) ..
Adventist eschatology firmly affirms Christ's second coming as the event that culminates in His taking His Bride home to His Father.
“1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. 4 And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know. ”
John 14:1-4 KJV
This is the "Revelation 20:1-15 & the 1,000 years (aka Millennium) Bible Study" thread.
(NOTE; PLEASE READ AT LEAST THIS POST BEFORE ENGAGING: Please, in charity (1 Cor. 13 KJB), be kind to each other's response in responding (Col. 4:6 KJB), whether one sees another's responses in error or not. This means a person can point out an error (by scripture), or by asking a question for clarification or in attempt to help another see a flaw, but please refrain from accusations, like 'liar' (that is difficult to prove motive of), 'deceiver', 'lost', &c/, like character assassinations, or previous argumentative history with a person (aka 'personal baggage / grievances / grudges'). As those things are unhelpful, and lead away from actual scriptural study. One may use words like correct, incorrect, fact and error, but in a kindly, demonstrative with evidence way.)
Here are the primary texts for study; Rev. 201-15 KJB (King James Bible), highlighting only "a thousand years", "the thousand years" in bold underline.
Rev 20:1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.Rev 20:2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,Rev 20:3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.Rev 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.Rev 20:5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.Rev 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.Rev 20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,Rev 20:8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.Rev 20:9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.Rev 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.Rev 20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.Rev 20:12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.Rev 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.Rev 20:14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.Rev 20:15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
This thread's author (myself) believes that the Bible is defined in the Bible, by God therein (Gen. 40:8; Isa. 28;10,13 KJB), and that as a Christian (we / I) should only "amen" what is already given to us therein from God (1 Pet. 4:11 KJB), as the scripture, being inspired of God (2 Tim. 3;16-17; 2 Pet. 1:21 KJB), is not the author of confusion (1 Cor. 14:33 KJB), but of "order" (1 Cor. 14:40 KJB) and perfect 'timing' (Ecc. 3:1 KJB), and 'cannot lie' (Tit. 1:2; Heb. 6:18 KJB), and so the word thereFrom, cannot be "broken" (non-contradictory; Jhn. 10:35; Psa. 119:160 KJB). This means I do not believe in, nor subscribe to, "private interpretation" (2 Pet. 1:20 KJB) at all. Therefore, if someone not liking a reply says, 'That is your [meaning 'my'] opinion ...', or something to that effect, they have unjustly mischaracterized my actual position, and present a 'strawman' of their own mind / making in its place, and have ceased from engaging with my actual response and position, and I may point this out in charity, and ask for a differing response. There is only 1 Truth, and it is the Truth of JEHOVAH Elohiym, being of, and belonging, to the LORD God. I do not have a monopoloy on Truth, as the Godhead shares with whomsoever They will.
Please go slowly, as it is not neccessary to place ones entire theology / eschatological position into a response. This thread is more about studying together, asking honest and sincere questions of one another about their positions held. People may openly disagree with one another, but please do so in a kindly fashion, with stated reasons / evidences for the disagreement. Allow the other respondant time to read, and engage with what is stated. If this thread, for whatever reason (generally satanic influences) becomes a name-calling event, as other threads, I will simply abandon this thread, and ask to have it closed by Moderation / Admin, or ask for a specific individual to be removed from further corrupt influence upon a sincerely intentioned endeavor.
"... be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves." - Mat. 10:16 KJB
Thank you all who participate in the Holy Spirit.
I wanted Advent to make his study more conversational and to provide supporting evidence, especially regarding how he altered the context of Hebrews 11 (Heaven Going) but he is unwell and seems intent on treating the thread more like a blog. I can see he has put in a lot of work, but approaching any study with preconceived ideas will only lead you to try to force notions onto the text that aren’t actually there.After reading more in your document I realize that aside from your comparisons between different parts of the Revelation, there are a lot of assertions made in your document - which is too much to first copy and paste and go through one by one here - but much of it is indeed SDA eschatology which I recognize but disagree with.
Thanks for this.I'm a little concerned that whatever I offer will either be designated "symbolic", or a metaphor for a cherished false doctrine. Nevertheless, you asked, ,so.
You are incorrect. Adventist eschatology firmly affirms Christ's second coming as the event that culminates in His taking His Bride home to His Father.
“1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. 4 And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know. ”
John 14:1-4 KJV
The meek do inherit the earth, but not at the second coming. There's business to be done first,
I'm a little concerned that whatever I offer will either be designated "symbolic", or a metaphor for a cherished false doctrine. Nevertheless, you asked, ,so.
You are incorrect. Adventist eschatology firmly affirms Christ's second coming as the event that culminates in His taking His Bride home to His Father.
“1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. 4 And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know. ”
John 14:1-4 KJV
Jesus was physically standing on earth, but was speaking about leaving earth to the disciples, thus the "where I am" is not on earth:Where was Christ when he said, "That where I am, there ye may be also"?
Thank you for reading. I hope that the comparisons are helpful to you never-the-less. Perhaps just pick one point that you think I am only "asserting", and I would hopefully be able to take some more time with you on it, and provide additional evidences. I am limited by the time, forum posting length, &c. Some comments are not meant to be indepoth, but simlpy summaries, which may be able to be gone over in more detail as later. After all, we are still on Rev. 20:1. Let me know, as you will.After reading more in your document I realize that aside from your comparisons between different parts of the Revelation, there are a lot of assertions made in your document
After our resurrection, we will have immortal bodies...not flesh and blood...but glorified bodies such as angels have and the Lord Himself. They are physical in that they can touch and be touched, (as the angel led Lot out of Sodom by the hand, and Jesus hugging His disciples and inviting Thomas to touch Him), so Jesus was talking about a future time where He would be, not where He was then.Where was Christ when he said, "That where I am, there ye may be also"?
Similarly to what Advent. posted, Jesus was talking about a futur time after the resurrection. Until then He promised to be with us by His Spirit, which promise He has kept. But the promise to return and take us to Himself and then to the Father is built into middle eastern typology where the groom traditionally came to take His bride away from her world and her family, and take her to His world and His family. That's a physical move being made by the bride and Groom, not a spiritual move by the groom.John 14
23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode [G3438 mone] with him.
1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.
2 In my Father’s house are many mansions [G3438 mone]: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.
G3438: mone. from 3306; a staying, i.e. residence (the act or the place):--abode, mansion.
G3306: meno: a primary verb; to stay (in a given place, state, relation or expectancy):--abide, continue, dwell, endure, be present, remain, stand, tarry (for), X thine own.
Compare:
(a) As I said unto the Jews,
Whither I go, ye cannot come; so now I say to you.
(b) Whither I go ye know, and the way ye know.
(c) Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way?
Jesus replied:
"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6).
Keep comparing the verses, because further on down in the passage - and still in the same context of speaking to His disciples about His departure - Jesus tells those who believe in Him and belong to Him:
16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
18 I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.
19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live [zao], ye shall live [zao] also.
20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.
21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?
23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode [G3438 mone] with him.
John 14
1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.
2 In my Father’s house are many mansions [G3438 mone]: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.
-- Jesus sat down at the right hand of the Father after He ascended into heaven, and after He had already prepared a place for the ones who believe in Him at the moment He said, "It is finished", when He bowed His head and gave up His spirit (John 19:30) --
John 14
3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.
4 And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know.
"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6).
22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?
23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode [G3438 mone] with him.
We are already now seated with Christ in heavenly places - Ephesians 1:3, 20 and 2:6. He's not taking us into heaven after coming down from heaven. We will meet Him in the air and come back down with Him when He destroys the beast and His armies. The wedding feast of the Lamb is a great slaughter (Revelation 19).
I am Seventh-day Adventist, here is a book which describes the details (so ill right now, cannot write much) - Godhead - The Eternal Heavenly Trio : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
where He would be, not where He was then.
Jesus was physically standing on earth, but was speaking about leaving earth to the disciples, thus the "where I am" is not on earth:
Joh 14:1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.Joh 14:2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.Joh 14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.Joh 14:4 And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know.
Jesus was not unclear. Jesus did not say, "here" (earth, where they were all standing), but "there", "the place" He was going "to", which is in His, "God" the, "Father's house". Jesus would leave earth for that "place", and later "come again" from that "place" to "receive" the disciples" "unto" "himself", which is not on earth, even as 1 Thes. 4:16-17 states, "descend from heaven", and be in the "air" to which all the resurrected shall be "caught up" to and then as 1 Thes. 4:14 states, "God" will "bring with" Jesus back to the "Father's house".
Mmm. So His heavenly Father's house is not in heaven?Then why did he say "where I am" rather than "where I'll be"?
"That where I am, there ye may be also"?
Going by what he said, he is on the Earth and says that's where "ye" would be. Not one word about somewhere else.
Pretribs also misrepresent the verse to claim a heavenly destination but that does not match the text. This is a case where doctrine altars the text into something not said.
This is the issue. Advent has his own narrative and regardless of the text of context he will make it fit.That is not what he said. He said we would be where he is, and he would be on the Earth so you are wrong about this fictional return to heraven.
This completely ignores the actual text, that he would return (to Earth) and THERE is where we would be with Him. You are using eisegesis to add in your personal belief that Jesus takes ppl to heaven after the second coming. No verse in the bible supports that.
Indeed. But there are numerous promises and prophecies that speak in the first person present, the discerning reader not needing to eisegete the scriptures to know it is referring to a future time and event, not related to present circumstances. Here are some classic and obvious examples.He said we would be where he is,
Out of interest how do you deal with Rev 5:10Mmm. So His heavenly Father's house is not in heaven?