Who really created the Son of God?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hiddenthings

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2025
3,777
415
83
Leeton NSW
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Must leave after this, but please reply for tomorrow.
ok
You agreed then proceed to reply with man-made dogma
Jesus had two natures:
Human/Divine
It's called the hypostatic union...this was an attempt by the early church to explain this "person" Jesus who seemed to be both human and divine.
Can't be proven from the Inspired Word which is the reason my position is watertight whereas yours is a bucket full of holes.
BTW,,,The Savior also had to be God to bridge the gap between man and God.
He had to be both God and man.
No, God required victory in fallen man which is why He raised up Christ from its condemned line otherwise you have a God who pretended to have victory over sin's flesh.
A mere man could not pay for the sins of the whole world.
Who said he was a mere man? His Father is God and he perceived the Spirit quickly - have you not read Isaiah 11:3?
I don't understand.
You need to try to understand.

Can God be exalted? Yes or No? Can God be given authority, name, throne and eternal life?

If your answer is no then Christ cannot be God.
In fact, Jesus was a Priest. He is our High Priest, right? Hebrews.
Jesus is:
A PROPHET
A PRIEST
A KING
Correct - all taken from among men!
What do you mean by: JESUS WAS GRANTED ETERNAL LIFE?
Not one person in this forum has been able to deal with these verses.

As David wrote, He (Jesus) asked life of You (God), and You (God) gave it to him, length of days forever and ever (Psalm 21:4).
Jesus affirmed, “The Father has granted the Son to have life in Himself” (John 5:26).
Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life” (John 6:35) and, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father (for Life) except through me (John 14:6).

“I live because of the Father” (John 6:57), and again, “As the Father has life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to have life in Himself” (John 5:26).
Jesus IS eternal life.
"Became" you mean!
I AM THE RESURRECTION AND THE LIFE.
True now finish the quote and tell me what it means!
Please post some scripture supporting what you're saying here:
There are many verses which deal with what Christ became:

“And being made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him.” Heb 5:9

You have a number of issues with this verse if you believe in the Trinity.

Can you see them?

The Trinity is totallu illogical on all these points which the Apostles clearly teach about the promised Messiah.

WHAT did the Apostles teach that is clearly illogical re the Trinity?

'night
Everything which is stated about the Lords nature and sacrifice is totally opposite to the teaching of the Trinity.
 

Hiddenthings

Well-Known Member
May 19, 2025
3,777
415
83
Leeton NSW
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
To re-iterate my Revelation questions:
  • Doesn't Rev 1:1 say explicitly that God gave Jesus the revelation?
  • And doesn't Rev 3:12 mention Jesus referring to his God 4 x?
@Ronald David Bruno will not acknowledge that the Glorified Christ is still subject to His God & Creator. If he believed as Paul did that the Head of Christ is God, this discussion would end promptly.
 

RepentingChristian

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2025
413
259
63
48
Omaha
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Repenting,,,
You should read the bible or go to a Christian church where you could learn where Jesus comes from.
Unless you're just kidding, of course.
You're making a movie...but Jesus was real and He died for us all.

I'm only speculating. Is it possible that we too will assist our Heavenly Father with the creation process? Does it seem likely that this is the only world our Father has ever created?
 

JustMe

Well-Known Member
May 6, 2025
1,172
1,333
113
US
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Our Father in Heaven says this to His Son:
"But to the Son He says:

“Your throne, O God, is forever and ever;
A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom." HEB. 1:8

THE Father refers to the Son as God - that's good enough for me.

Yes, it makes sense to me.
Why is it good enough to be happy with the same distorted and tainted scripture you keep parading around as some kind of trophy? You are not capable or no motivated I guess in knowing and understanding scripture from it original form in context and the history it was originally written in. and with this particular verse you stop far short of knowing anything about verse 18. You say wake up to me, then what shall I say to you to convince you've become suddenly numb and asleep to some of the reality in certain scripture.

Why have you not added in verse 19 into your parade? You must know that verse 18 was deliberately changed, as it does not fit verses 19.

Here is the same, all nearly the same words I have written to you about verses 18 previously, and I will keep sending this text in the hope you will get it and so wake you up.

And the Father in Heaven never said anything about an independent everlasting throne for his Son. That is a gross assumption and very deceptive.

Face it, you only see in scripture the 3-in-1 model when it comes to your god, and in any verse that even remotely supports it. It is a fools errand you know.

--------------------let me set you straight again...and again ,,,and again....

There is much information suggesting that Yeshua is NOT God with his throne in heaven.

Believers in the Trinity render Hebrews 1:8 this way: “But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever.” Thus, they feel that Yeshua is shown to be the same as Almighty God. Why is this not correct? It's a lie

Look at some of the many counter claims.

But first, note the context. In many translations, either in the main text or in the margin, Hebrews 1:9 reads, “God, your God, anointed you.” This makes it clear that the one addressed in verse eight is not God, but one who worships God and is anointed by him.

Secondly, it should be noted that Hebrews 1:8, 9 is a quotation from Psalm 45:6, 7, which originally was addressed to a human king of Israel. Surely the writer of this Psalm did not think that this human king was Almighty God and neither did the writer of Hebrews think that Yeshua was Almighty God. Commenting on this, scholar B. F. Westcott said: “It is scarcely possible that אלוהים [‘Elo·himʹ, “God”] in the original can be addressed to the king.

Thus, on the whole it seems best to adopt in the first clause the rendering: God is Thy throne (or Thy throne is God), that is ‘Thy kingdom is founded upon God.’”

Read that again and again...it is God's Kingdom and not his Son's. He was given authority for a passage of time and then he will return it to his Father, who is God.

There is good evidence that the proper translation of Heb. 1:8 (as well as Ps. 45:6) should be “your throne is God forever” or “God is your throne forever.”

If we look at some who are said to be respected trinitarian authorities, we also see a preference for the “God is thy throne” rendering.

Oxford professor and famed trinitarian Bible translator, Dr. James Moffatt, has been described as “probably the greatest biblical scholar of our day.” His Bible translation renders Heb. 1:8 as:

“God is thy throne for ever and ever.”

University of Cambridge professor and noted New Testament language scholar, Dr. C. F. D. Moule reluctantly admits that Heb. 1:8 may conceivably be “construed so as to mean Thy throne is God” - p. 32, An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek, Cambridge University Press, 1990 printing.

An American Translation (Smith-Goodspeed), renders it: “God is your throne....”

And The Bible in Living English (Byington) reads: “God is your throne....”

Noted trinitarian NT scholar Dr. William Barclay, in his translation of the New Testament, has also rendered Hebrews 1:8 as : “God is your throne for ever and ever.”

Famed trinitarian (Southern Baptist) New Testament Greek scholar Dr. A. T. Robertson acknowledges that either “Thy throne, O God” or “God is thy throne” may be proper renderings: “Either makes good sense.” - Word Pictures in the New Testament, Vol. v, p. 339.

The American Standard Version (ASV), the Revised Standard Version (RSV), the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), and The New English Bible (NEB) have provided honest alternate readings to the traditional trinitarian rendering of the KJV at Hebrews 1:8. These alternate readings (found in footnotes) agree with Dr. Moffatt’s, Dr. Barclay’s, Smith-Goodspeed’s, Byington’s, and the New World Translation’s renderings of this scripture (“God is your throne”).

Even Young’s Concise Bible Commentary (written by the noted trinitarian author of Young’s Analytical Concordance to the Bible) admits: “[Heb. 1:8] may be justly rendered ‘God is thy throne ....’”

Quoted From Ps. 45

In addition to these admissions by trinitarian translators concerning Heb. 1:8 itself, we need to look back at the Old Testament Hebrew scripture (Ps. 45:6) that Paul was quoting when he wrote Heb. 1:8.

The RSV renders it as “Your Divine throne” and a footnote provides these alternate
readings: “Or your throne is a throne of God, or Thy throne, O God.’”

The NEB says: “Your throne is like God’s throne.”

The Holy Scriptures (JPS version) says: “Thy throne given of God.”

The Bible in Living English (Byington) says: “God is your throne.”

The Message has: "Your throne is God's throne, ever and always.”

The Good News Bible (GNB), Bible, renders it: “The kingdom that God has given you will last
forever and ever.” - ABS, 1976.

The Good News Translation (GNT): “The kingdom that God has given you will last forever and
ever.” – ABS, 1992.

The REB has: “God has enthroned you for all eternity.”

The NJB gives us: “your throne is from God.”

We also see the following statement by respected trinitarian scholars in a footnote for this passage:
“45:6 O God. Possibly the king’s throne is called God’s throne because he is God’s appointed regent. But it is also possible that the king himself is addressed as ‘god.’” - Ps. 45:6 in the NIV Study Bible. [Also see footnote in the NAB, St. Joseph ed.]

In addition to the above renderings by many respected translators (most of whom are trinitarian), we have the statement by one of the greatest scholars of Biblical Hebrew of all time, H. F. W. Gesenius. In his famous and highly respected Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament Gesenius renders Ps. 45:6, “thy throne shall be a divine throne.”

Just the admission by so many trinitarian translators (above) that Heb. 1:8 may be honestly translated as it is even in the NWT, makes any insistence by other trinitarians that this scripture is acceptable evidence for a trinity doctrine completely invalid!

Does your verse 18 version and its ridiculous meaning still make sense to you? It shouldn't although I suspect you are a die-hard fan of advertising 'anything with do' to prop up your contrived indescribable 3-in-1 theatrical play.
 
Last edited:

NayborBear

Active Member
Jan 21, 2020
679
226
43
73
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
@Ronald David Bruno will not acknowledge that the Glorified Christ is still subject to His God & Creator. If he believed as Paul did that the Head of Christ is God, this discussion would end promptly.
The reason I come into this forum from time to time, and just review the "current topics", and sometimes, should there be a discussion that piques my interest, such as this one had, is being argued: Is Mainly to see who is saying what.
Ones' such as Ronald David Bruno whom you have listed, and whom, is not the only one in here, are much like those described here:
Ezekiel 13:
5 Ye have not gone up into the gaps, neither made up the hedge for the house of Israel to stand in the battle in the day of the Lord.
6 They have seen vanity and lying divination, saying, The Lord saith: and the Lord hath not sent them: and they have made others to hope that they would confirm the word.
7 Have ye not seen a vain vision, and have ye not spoken a lying divination, whereas ye say, The Lord saith it; albeit I have not spoken?
10 Because, even because they have seduced my people, saying, Peace; and there was no peace; and one built up a wall, and, lo, others daubed it with untempered morter:
19 And will ye pollute me among my people for handfuls of barley and for pieces of bread, to slay the souls that should not die, and to save the souls alive that should not live, by your lying to my people that hear your lies?

20 Wherefore thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I am against your pillows, wherewith ye there hunt the souls to make them fly, and I will tear them from your arms, and will let the souls go, even the souls that ye hunt to make them fly.
22 Because with lies ye have made the heart of the righteous sad, whom I have not made sad; and strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way, by promising him life:

In the knowing that arguing with such people is pretty much pointless? Nevertheless, the good of it is that some people who have been "seduced" by these, such as Wrangler, start realizing that there IS more to God's Word than what is being put forth.

And I know most will comment: "I've read the back of the Book!" "God wins!"
Which is true!
God does win!
But? Do they?

Just because they are not up to the task of verse 5 above?
Doesn't mean everyone they horn swoggle are.
These are the ones'! The ones' in verses 20 & 22!
These are the ones' I would like them to know:
You are not alone! :vgood:
 

GodsGrace

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2017
17,514
8,609
113
Tuscany
Faith
Christian
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
I'm only speculating. Is it possible that we too will assist our Heavenly Father with the creation process? Does it seem likely that this is the only world our Father has ever created?
The NT does not teach that we will be creating.

Man can MAKE things
but, in theology, only God can create....which means to make something where nothing existed before.

Also, we can wonder many things since our brain is always working.
But we have to be careful not to go beyond what God has revealed to us.

If we do this...we can come up with all sorts of strange ideas.

It's possible that God has created other world systems, but we cannot know this for sure and should not think of it as being factual.

I believe you're speaking of the multiverse theory and some on YouTube do teach this.
I like to stick to the bible and not stray too far.

I respect Wm Lane Craig...a top world philosopher.
Here is what he thinks:




 

RepentingChristian

Well-Known Member
Dec 2, 2025
413
259
63
48
Omaha
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Also, we can wonder many things since our brain is always working.
But we have to be careful not to go beyond what God has revealed to us.

What is the issue with contemplating about the possibilities in Heaven? Didn't Jesus say "With God anything is possible"?
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
20,732
8,988
113
57
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
“God is thy throne for ever and ever.”

University of Cambridge professor and noted New Testament language scholar, Dr. C. F. D. Moule reluctantly admits that Heb. 1:8 may conceivably be “construed so as to mean Thy throne is God” - p. 32, An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek, Cambridge University Press, 1990 printing.
I've observed it many times. Trinitarians doctrinally invest in ambiguous verses. They do this because of the complete absence of their IDOL. Why else would anyone doctrinally invest in an ambiguous verse?

At the same time, they ignore a more explicit repudiation than is hard to conceive in so few words, for us, there is one God, the Father. This agrees with Jesus saying the Father is the only true God. What does that say about the Trinitarian god?
 
  • Love
Reactions: JustMe

HealthyShape

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2025
1,827
673
113
Northeast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Could you please avoid threatening another poster by saying 'he is not a Christian' in this manner? It would be better to stay calm and focus on objective reasoning during these discussions. In other words, could you contribute in a way that might encourage others to consider your perspective? Doing so would help a lot and prevent this thread from being shut down, without any clear and reasonable cause. Thank you.
You are ignoring the rules of this board. Somebody with the label "Christian" cannot attack Trinity. You are misleading readers about your identity, here on this board.

But do not feel alone, the same applies to @NayborBear, @JustMe, @Aunty Jane and others who label themselves "Christian" in their profile, to look as a standard Christian until they actually post their real beliefs.
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: GRACE ambassador

HealthyShape

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2025
1,827
673
113
Northeast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Again, stay objective and do not let your emotions run wild. And please ask questions concerning my post without making outlandish assumptions and remarks, (like as you said not I, "throw everything away, ignore that the New Testament was written by Christians") thanks. It's clearly just a waste of everyone's time, yours included.
It is objective and not emotional.

Your try to use the writings of Christians and to ignore what Christians believe to interpret the writings according to your own way, is both disrespectful and absurd.

If you want to create another religion, create your own sacred writings, too. Why not. Why to even try to justify it with Christian writings?
 
Last edited:

HealthyShape

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2025
1,827
673
113
Northeast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
‘The Son is YHWH.

Then you shall flee through My mountain valley,
For the mountain valley shall reach to Azal.
Yes, you shall flee
As you fled from the earthquake
In the days of Uzziah king of Judah.
Thus the LORD my God will come,
And all the saints with You.

Zechariah 14:5
It seems that both Father and Son are called YHWH.
 

HealthyShape

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2025
1,827
673
113
Northeast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Oh! It's Christianity alright! Just not "your Churchianity!"
Which is more than likely the reason you are unable to understand!
No, it is heresy. And Christianity does not exist without church, so "churchianity" is a nonsensical word used by plenty of heretics who create their own way, without any orthodox church in their life.
 

JustMe

Well-Known Member
May 6, 2025
1,172
1,333
113
US
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You are ignoring the rules of this board. Somebody with the label "Christian" cannot attack Trinity. You are misleading readers about your identity, here on this board.

But do not feel alone, the same applies to @NayborBear, @JustMe, @Aunty Jane and others who label themselves "Christian" in their profile, to look as a standard Christian until they actually post their real beliefs.
Stop threatening me and whing about your insecurities. I did not attack anyone or anything credible, only of things based on theories and not clearly defined as fact, only a part of someone's belief. The only one attacking anything is you attacking me with an appeal to authority to cry out in despair. You have nothing of substance to say to me so please go away, you are now becoming destructive.

You call yourself a Christian in the way of Christ - not read in my books. You should rethink and reconsider what yo have said to me as you owe me an apology for fabricating things about me...my own religion, indeed...what next. Just go away..
 
Last edited:

JustMe

Well-Known Member
May 6, 2025
1,172
1,333
113
US
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Bible says that Jesus is God. Bible says that Jesus is man. Bible says that Jesus is Lord.

All of the above. Not just the last two.
If you can not add any credible evidence to your beliefs, then you will always be a target of ridicule on these forums. It's that simple. And it's ironic that when I provide convincing arguments, many, as you, ignore them completely, and continue to blast out the same one-liners of your undecipherable or unexplainable beliefs. This is what a debate is meant to be all about, to share and discuss and rebut both sides. You and many others, however, do not like two sides of a story, only your side to be told. You stifle debates and just want to paint all discussions only in the colors of your beliefs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.