Which human messengers exactly? Please tell me who exactly you think "the angels who sinned" are.
Are you still trying to say that verse 4 is referring to the people (human messengers) of Noah's day? No, it is not. You are absolutely mistaken about. Peter differentiates between "the angels who sinned" and the ungodly of Noah's day. Look at the text carefully.
2 Peter 2:4 For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast
them down to [
a]hell and delivered
them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; 5 and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah,
one of eight
people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; 6 and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned
them to destruction, making
them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly;
Notice the word "and" there at the beginning of 2 Peter 2:5. That shows that Peter is saying in verse 5 that not only did God not spare the angels who sinned while casting them to Tartarus and reserving them for judgment, but He also spared not the ancient world consisting of the ungodly in Noah's day and He only saved Noah and his family. So, Peter differentiated between "the angels who sinned" and the ungodly of Noah's day. It's just not reasonable at all to claim that the ungodly of Noah's day are in view in 2 Peter 2:4. That makes verse 5 redundant. Peter went on to give a third example of a group that God judged and will punish in verse 6 when he referenced the ungodly of Sodom and Gomorrah.
It absolutely is. Only doctrinal bias can prevent you from seeing that.
That's what Peter points out in 2 Peter 2:5. No ungodly people were cast to Tartarus. They go to Hades, according to Jesus in Luke 16:23 where He references the rich man as being in Hades. There is no basis for equating Tartarus with Hades. Both are translated as "hell", but that doesn't make them the same. Even the grave where dead bodies are is sometimes translated as hell, so you need to consider the original language and text in cases like this.
So, you have no excuse for correcting your false belief. You have been told the truth about this and are too stubborn to adjust your belief accordingly.
Except that I have. Repeatedly. You are too stubborn to admit that your belief that Satan and demons were created evil blatantly contradicts the fact that everything God created was very good. And your supposed proof that it's not talking about angels in 2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 6 is just that the Greek word can also be translated as messengers (i.e. human messengers). Yet, all of the English translators translate the word as "angels". For a reason. It's because it's talking about angels and not humans.
That's your favorite comment, but it's meaningless. I study scripture for myself and it's not from "man of old" as you falsely accuse. I am showing you the scriptures that I base my beliefs on. I'm not quoting any "man of old" who told me what to believe. This accusation is a total copout. Address my beliefs, not the beliefs of "man of old". You believe some things that have been believed for a long time. Does that make those things not true? This is a ridiculous line of argument that you make here that I can't take seriously at all.
For about the tenth million time, everything God created was very good. Therefore, the one we call Satan and the ones we call demons had to have been very good when they were created. You have no way around that.
You can't take this verse out of your Bible.
Genesis 1:31 Then God saw
everything that He had made, and indeed
it was very good. So the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Also, there is no way around the fact that Genesis 1:3-5 is talking about literal light and darkness because they are related directly to the literal day and night and literal morning and evening. Your belief causes you to twist that text and change it to metaphorical light and darkness instead.
Just as Adam and Eve were created very good, so were Satan and demons. I know that because scrpiture expliclity says that EVERYTHING God created was very good. There is no way around this. No amount of meaningless talk about myths and men of old can change that.
You acknowledge here that man became wicked. He was created very good just like everything else, right? So, why are you able to understand that, but can't acknowledge that some angels also became wicked? It's not as if you don't allow for beings to be good and become wicked since that's what you believe about Adam and Eve.
Scripture primarily deals with the relationship with God and man. It's not the purpose of scripture to go into detail about the relationship between God and angels. So, this argument is very weak. And we know that God will indeed punish Satan and other evil spirit beings we call demons, so it's not as if God doesn't also punish spirit beings rather than only human beings.