Revelation 13:12 says "everyone on earth, will be forced to worship the beast", does that mean everyone on earth needs to repent? (refuse to repent?)

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
15,973
3,379
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
In my honest opinion, one must look deep into the Genesis to get any spiritual perspective of Revelation.
There is so much symbolic content it's so very hard to interpret.
I'm still searching Genesis for answers I struggle with.

In Isaiah 46:8-10 it is written (NIV),

Just as much as in Genesis, so do all the Old Testament prophets cover many of those Revelation symbols. One could say the Book of Revelation is a continuation like one of the Books of the prophets. Lord Jesus was a Prophet also.
 

boltupright

Member
Apr 27, 2026
22
11
18
64
Vancouver B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Just as much as in Genesis, so do all the Old Testament prophets cover many of those Revelation symbols. One could say the Book of Revelation is a continuation like one of the Books of the prophets. Lord Jesus was a Prophet also.
You are absolutely right, the "symbolism" provided by the prophets is paramount to interpretation.
Not for just Revelation as it is worthy of consideration for all scripture.
My point is, to have a viable understanding of Revelation, it is imperative to get an understanding of the beginning first.

I believe that to this day we still have not grasped all that Genesis has to offer, at least I know I haven't gotten anywhere near a grasp of Revelation yet.
As far as God being His own prophet, I guess is like God being His own Son.

God bless you Davy.

boltupright.
 
Last edited:

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
15,973
3,379
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
You are absolutely right, the "symbolism" provided by the prophets is paramount to interpretation.
Not for just Revelation as it is worthy of consideration for all scripture.
My point is, to have a viable understanding of Revelation, it is imperative to get an understanding of the beginning first.

I believe that to this day we still have not grasped all that Genesis has to offer, at least I know I haven't gotten anywhere near a grasp of Revelation yet.
As far as God being His own prophet, I guess is like God being His own Son.

God bless you Davy.

boltupright.

I understand what you mean. Because I'm an old-world creationist. I interpret Genesis 1 showing there existed a previous world earth age prior to Genesis 1:2. In the Hebrew, the phrase "without form, and void" does not mean that. Instead, it means the earth had become a waste and an undistinguishable ruin (tohu va bohu). God first created all His creation at Genesis 1:1 in the beginning. That also was when the devil followed God, and was perfect in his ways (Ezekiel 28 parable). At some point in between Gen.1:1 and Gen.1:2, Lucifer rebelled, and God ended that old world by a flood. This was long.... before the flood of Noah's day.

Since Gen.1:1 was the actual Perfect creation by God in the beginning, and Lucifer followed God originally, it points to a time of no sin, .no death, like how Revelation points to the future new heavens and a new earth. Then Lucifer rebelled in coveting God's Throne which was his job to guard. That was the first sin in the beginning. And thus the power of death was assigned to Lucifer, and God must have created the abode of hell as the place of separation for Satan and the wicked in the heavenly. God then ended that 1st world earth age. Rev.12:3-4 reveals that Lucifer rebelled using a beast kingdom on earth that had ten horns, seven heads, but only seven crowns. That was given within the time of his drawing one third of the angels into rebellion with him. Thus there were cities and nations on the earth in that 1st world earth age. But it was an angelic existence upon the earth, no flesh man. This is why the "without form, and void" (tohu va bohu) phrase is repeated in Jeremiah 4. All the cities were broken down by God's fierce anger.

In Revelation, when Jesus returns, we all will be in spiritual bodies. And eventually hell and death and sin are destroyed and are no more.

So this present world, a 2nd world earth age, is temporary, and not how God's original perfect creation was. Everything in this 2nd world earth age is in a state of corruption and decay. Apostle Paul revealed this difference in Romans 8.

Moses called Lord Jesus a "Prophet" in Deuteronomy 18:15. Peter referred that prophecy was about Lord Jesus per Acts 3:20-23.

May God bless.
 

boltupright

Member
Apr 27, 2026
22
11
18
64
Vancouver B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
I understand what you mean. Because I'm an old-world creationist. I interpret Genesis 1 showing there existed a previous world earth age prior to Genesis 1:2. In the Hebrew, the phrase "without form, and void" does not mean that. Instead, it means the earth had become a waste and an undistinguishable ruin (tohu va bohu). God first created all His creation at Genesis 1:1 in the beginning. That also was when the devil followed God, and was perfect in his ways (Ezekiel 28 parable). At some point in between Gen.1:1 and Gen.1:2, Lucifer rebelled, and God ended that old world by a flood. This was long.... before the flood of Noah's day.
Understood, you describe a theme as what I deem possible that the satan or lucifer, rebelled in that stretch of time.
However long in time that may have taken.
Many look at it as heresy!
Many believe that the heavens and the earth were created in just one day yet it describes the firmament/heavens are created on day two, so one would ask, what are the "heavens" with regards to being "in the beginning"?
Many look at Gen.1:1 as a paraphrase of what is about to take place and that is quite understandable.
There is more than one way to look at scripture and at times scripture will not refute certain ideas.
Knowing Hebrew and Greek is a huge advantage no doubt, I know neither and rely on Google.

I tend to lean towards the old world existence where there is a possibility that the earth existed, before the creation that exists afterwards, starting in the Gen.1:2.
Especially with all the science-based evidence towards an "old earth".
If an asteroid were to hit earth to completely destroy all the host thereof, wouldn't it make the earth "without form ,null and void" as described in Genesis 1?
Since Gen.1:1 was the actual Perfect creation by God in the beginning, and Lucifer followed God originally, it points to a time of no sin, .no death, like how Revelation points to the future new heavens and a new earth. Then Lucifer rebelled in coveting God's Throne which was his job to guard. That was the first sin in the beginning. And thus the power of death was assigned to Lucifer, and God must have created the abode of hell as the place of separation for Satan and the wicked in the heavenly. God then ended that 1st world earth age. Rev.12:3-4 reveals that Lucifer rebelled using a beast kingdom on earth that had ten horns, seven heads, but only seven crowns. That was given within the time of his drawing one third of the angels into rebellion with him. Thus there were cities and nations on the earth in that 1st world earth age. But it was an angelic existence upon the earth, no flesh man. This is why the "without form, and void" (tohu va bohu) phrase is repeated in Jeremiah 4. All the cities were broken down by God's fierce anger.

Many have all sorts of theories about a previous world before Gen.1:2 as do I, however that is all they are, just theory.
There is no scriptural referance anywhere with regards to a previous creation so it is null and void to the fundamentals of scripture.
We can only interpret what we can read.


It appears you believe the rebellion of the satan occurred after Gen.1:2, or before?
I believe that the angelic rebellion happened before Gen.1:2 when the light separated from the darkness.

In Revelation, when Jesus returns, we all will be in spiritual bodies. And eventually hell and death and sin are destroyed and are no more.

So this present world, a 2nd world earth age, is temporary, and not how God's original perfect creation was. Everything in this 2nd world earth age is in a state of corruption and decay. Apostle Paul revealed this difference in Romans 8.

Moses called Lord Jesus a "Prophet" in Deuteronomy 18:15. Peter referred that prophecy was about Lord Jesus per Acts 3:20-23.

Can you descibe what you mean by the bold print in your post?

I agree "eventually" sin death and hell will be destroyed after the 1000 year reign.
This would indicate that we will have to still be on our guard then the satan is released afterwards.

It's good to discuss these things yet it might be better to start a new thread in a more appropriate place on this forum to discuss further?
 
Last edited:

Spiritual Israelite

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,902
6,853
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I understand what you mean. Because I'm an old-world creationist. I interpret Genesis 1 showing there existed a previous world earth age prior to Genesis 1:2. In the Hebrew, the phrase "without form, and void" does not mean that. Instead, it means the earth had become a waste and an undistinguishable ruin (tohu va bohu). God first created all His creation at Genesis 1:1 in the beginning. That also was when the devil followed God, and was perfect in his ways (Ezekiel 28 parable). At some point in between Gen.1:1 and Gen.1:2, Lucifer rebelled, and God ended that old world by a flood. This was long.... before the flood of Noah's day.
This is utter nonsense and tells us all we need to know about your lack of spiritual discernment. You just make things up. Your beliefs are based on your imagination. You cannot be taken seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: William Barton

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
15,973
3,379
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Understood, you describe a theme as what I deem possible that the satan or lucifer, rebelled in that stretch of time.
However long in time that may have taken.
Many look at it as heresy!

Yeah, many Christians in the past have been accused of heresy, take Martin Luther for one example. It's what God's Word says that's important, not what men's doctrines say.

Many believe that the heavens and the earth were created in just one day yet it describes the firmament/heavens are created on day two, so one would ask, what are the "heavens" with regards to being "in the beginning"?
Many look at Gen.1:1 as a paraphrase of what is about to take place and that is quite understandable.
There is more than one way to look at scripture and at times scripture will not refute certain ideas.
Knowing Hebrew and Greek is a huge advantage no doubt, I know neither and rely on Google.

For English speaking peoples that don't know Biblical Hebrew or Greek, there have been several scholars of the past who provided a foundation for going into the Biblical languages. The Strong's Exhaustive Concordance by Dr. James Strong has been a mainstay in that, and is what I mostly use, because, I use the KJV and the Strong's takes every word in the Bible manuscripts used for the KJV, assigns a number to it, and gives the language definition. There's many Bible study tools developed using Strong's numbers. I use BibleSoft OneTouch software, but not sure if one can still buy it.

Those on the NEC (New Earth Creation) boat believe it how you said, like Gen.1:1 is just a summary, and the details then follow. Thing is, there's other Bible Scripture relative to the Genesis 1:1- 1:2 events in other Bible Books most never consider. In Romans 8:18-25, Apostle Paul said the creation seeks release from the "bondage of corruption" as God made the creation subject to vanity. That automatically suggests the creation was in a better state beforehand, and that something happened to cause God to place today's creation in bondage.

In the Jer.4:23-28 Scripture, Hebrew tohu va bohu ("without form, and void") appears again, the only other place it appears. Hebrew tohu, if you'll look at all the verses of how it is used, is about something that was once in a good state that went bad or into corruption. God even hinted at today's cause of violent weather on the earth when He said for this reason (because of the ancient destruction He did upon the earth), the earth would mourn, and the heavens above would be black (Jer.4:27-28). I studied aviation, and had to take courses for a private pilot license which included a study of the earth's weather. The reason for the violent storms today is because of the holes in our cloud atmosphere heating the earth and evaporation, with hot air rising into the higher altitudes of cold air. And when the two fronts meet, violent storms are caused, and water moisture fills up the clouds and they turn dark (black). That suggests God's 'original' perfect creation was not in that state it is in today. It actually explains the Rev.21 mystery that in God's future Kingdom there will be no more sea. The waters on the earth are going to go back up into the cloud atmosphere and fill all those sky holes, which will create an even temperature tropical paradise over the whole earth.


I tend to lean towards the old world existence where there is a possibility that the earth existed, before the creation that exists afterwards, starting in the Gen.1:2.
Especially with all the science-based evidence towards an "old earth".

Well, there's true science, and then there's pseudo-science. Evolution of species theory is pseudo-science. Just like how at one time even the naturalist scientist status quo was that the earth was flat, scientists are just as capable today to make errors with their theories. The evidence I think is most important are things like the woolly mammoth found buried frozen in ice in the Arctic zone still with undigested vegetation in its stomach, and vegetation in its mouth where it had been suddenly frozen while grazing in a green field. God's Word does account for that event, most brethren simply don't go into that mind mode to think about it. Perfect human arch footprints found inside dinosaur footprints, both fossilized together from the same time, is another example. I consider those human footprints to be those of the angels that dwelt on earth back before Lucifer rebelled. No human skeletal remains have ever been found with those fossilized footprints.

If an asteroid were to hit earth to completely destroy all the host thereof, wouldn't it make the earth "without form ,null and void" as described in Genesis 1?

That still won't work, because the Hebrew phrase tohu va bohu that is translated to "without form, and void" is not what that Hebrew phrase actually means. The "without form, and void" interpretation is actually tied to scientific speculation, because science believes stars, galaxies, etc. start like a gathering of ether gas out of nothing that slowly forms a material matter base. God's Word instead says God spoke and His creation came into existence.

Many have all sorts of theories about a previous world before Gen.1:2 as do I, however that is all they are, just theory.
There is no scriptural referance anywhere with regards to a previous creation so it is null and void to the fundamentals of scripture.
We can only interpret what we can read.

I disagree, strongly, that there is no Bible Scripture evidence pointing to a previous 1st world earth age prior to this one of today, the time when Lucifer was perfect in his ways following God. Apostle Peter in 2 Peter 3 is actually describing that 1st world earth age, the "world that then was".

It appears you believe the rebellion of the satan occurred after Gen.1:2, or before?
I believe that the angelic rebellion happened before Gen.1:2 when the light separated from the darkness.
I use the devil's name Lucifer for before he rebelled. It means 'morning star'. His name Satan began to apply after... he had already rebelled and had fallen, as it points to his role as the Adversary. Thus his rebellion had to have happened prior... to Adam and Eve, for by the time of Adam and Eve he was already in God's Garden tempting Eve.

Can you descibe what you mean by the bold print in your post?

When I am quoting directly from the KJV, a word or phrase, I try to put that in bold-italics. So if someone uses a concordance, and are looking for where that KJV word or phrase appears, they can simply type it in and do a search.

I agree "eventually" sin death and hell will be destroyed after the 1000 year reign.
This would indicate that we will have to still be on our guard then the satan is released afterwards.

Christ's elect who reign with Him during His "thousand years" need not worry about Satan's final release and deception, for that event will be only upon the unsaved.

It's good to discuss these things yet it might be better to start a new thread in a more appropriate place on this forum to discuss further?
 

Dan Clarkston

Well-Known Member
Dec 16, 2023
3,363
1,224
113
56
Denver Colorado
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Revelation 13:12 says "everyone on earth, will be forced to worship the beast", does that mean everyone on earth needs to repent? (refuse to repent?)

That's not true.

Some will refuse to worship the nutjob and will get whacked which is a win for them as they go to be with the Lord. :dusted:
 

Dan Clarkston

Well-Known Member
Dec 16, 2023
3,363
1,224
113
56
Denver Colorado
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
"Earth" (Revelation 13:12) is Greek γη = " land." There was no concept of planet earth in Biblical times.

You did understand that the earth is one big ball of land with seven oceans right?


Can you descibe what you mean by the bold print in your post?

He's most likely referring to print that looks like this here
 
Apr 7, 2026
371
50
28
74
Lexington KY
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Dan Clarkston noted:

>earth is one big ball of land>

I understand that, but there was no such understanding in Biblical times.

The idea of a round planet earth was proposed by Pythagoras in 6th century BCE.

The earth is so big that it appears flat in everyday life.

FYI I hold a B.S., M.S., PhD.
 
Last edited:

boltupright

Member
Apr 27, 2026
22
11
18
64
Vancouver B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Yeah, many Christians in the past have been accused of heresy, take Martin Luther for one example. It's what God's Word says that's important, not what men's doctrines say.
I get your point, it's just that we are not Martin Luther and people don't know who we are, yet we are welcomed into a great place here, where it's formatted to express one's ideas of faith.
The difference between God's Word and Christian doctrine is all about the interpretation of it, is it not?
We are visitors here, so don't fret if people disagree with your interpretation.
I'm just suggesting here that it is paramount to be very accurate to biblical scripture, and there is always a time, place and more effective way to present your interpretation.
For English speaking peoples that don't know Biblical Hebrew or Greek, there have been several scholars of the past who provided a foundation for going into the Biblical languages. The Strong's Exhaustive Concordance by Dr. James Strong has been a mainstay in that, and is what I mostly use, because, I use the KJV and the Strong's takes every word in the Bible manuscripts used for the KJV, assigns a number to it, and gives the language definition. There's many Bible study tools developed using Strong's numbers. I use BibleSoft OneTouch software, but not sure if one can still buy it.

Thanks for the referance.
Well, there's true science, and then there's pseudo-science. Evolution of species theory is pseudo-science. Just like how at one time even the naturalist scientist status quo was that the earth was flat, scientists are just as capable today to make errors with their theories. The evidence I think is most important are things like the woolly mammoth found buried frozen in ice in the Arctic zone still with undigested vegetation in its stomach, and vegetation in its mouth where it had been suddenly frozen while grazing in a green field. God's Word does account for that event, most brethren simply don't go into that mind mode to think about it. Perfect human arch footprints found inside dinosaur footprints, both fossilized together from the same time, is another example. I consider those human footprints to be those of the angels that dwelt on earth back before Lucifer rebelled. No human skeletal remains have ever been found with those fossilized footprints.

I agree, however I determine within my own mind what is viable in today's science or not.
An earth more than 6000 years old seems possible to me and viable which agrees with science, yet I believe that the sun and moon were not, as they were created on day 4 in Gen. which conflicts with science.
I look at scriptures the same way if you can get my point.
What could be "possible within the parameters of scripture reference is indeed possible, everything else is just conjecture.
How it's interpretative validity stands is very personal to each of us so try to make your presentation as accurate to scripture as can be as someone will indeed point the mistakes out, if this happens.
That still won't work, because the Hebrew phrase tohu va bohu that is translated to "without form, and void" is not what that Hebrew phrase actually means. The "without form, and void" interpretation is actually tied to scientific speculation, because science believes stars, galaxies, etc. start like a gathering of ether gas out of nothing that slowly forms a material matter base. God's Word instead says God spoke and His creation came into existence.
I see your point, where would the asteroid come from it there were no stars or other matter to account for an impact event, yet anything is possible as long as it is within scripture reference.
I see an asteroid event as possible, not absolute.
To present things as absolutes with regards to Biblical theology according to our interpretation one  must be accurate to the text to the fullest, otherwise stand oneself corrected when necessary.
Whether anything is viable inside scripture is according to personal revelation and whatever has merit outside of scripture is dependent on solid evidence.
At least this is how I understand things.
Well like I said, I interpret science strictly and subjectively within the parameters of scripture.
When I am quoting directly from the KJV, a word or phrase, I try to put that in bold-italics. So if someone uses a concordance, and are looking for where that KJV word or phrase appears, they can simply type it in and do a search.
You misinterpret my previous statement to you here.
I meant the bold print I provide to you back when I responded back to you.
If I respond to you with you own quote and provide bold print back is for you to know where I wish clarification on the quote.
Do you get what I mean?
I use the devil's name Lucifer for before he rebelled. It means 'morning star'. His name Satan began to apply after... he had already rebelled and had fallen, as it points to his role as the Adversary. Thus his rebellion had to have happened prior... to Adam and Eve, for by the time of Adam and Eve he was already in God's Garden tempting Eve.
I do the same, if I am if I am referring to "the woman" as in Eve, it is when I speak about her after she was named by Adam.
When I refer her as "the woman" or "his wife" is when she was previously named by God, the same as her husband.
I always thought lucifer meant "light bearer" now find out it can mean both.
Christ's elect who reign with Him during His "thousand years" need not worry about Satan's final release and deception, for that event will be only upon the unsaved.
I wouldn't use the word "worry" here as the way I see it, the elect still will need to be on their guard as the adversary is no slouch and will indeed make effort to take down as many as he can, especially the elect.
To say this statement "upon the unsaved" is inaccurate because all who are present in the nations at that time are indeed "saved" already.
I disagree, strongly, that there is no Bible Scripture evidence pointing to a previous 1st world earth age prior to this one of today, the time when Lucifer was perfect in his ways following God. Apostle Peter in 2 Peter 3 is actually describing that 1st world earth age, the "world that then was".

What exactly does it referace in 2 Peter 3 in your words how this can suggest a previous flood event other than in Noah's day.?
 
Last edited:

Dan Clarkston

Well-Known Member
Dec 16, 2023
3,363
1,224
113
56
Denver Colorado
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I understand that, but there was no such understanding in Biblical times.

Moot point really. Just like to day, very few care what shape the world is as it doesn't effect their daily lives


FYI I hold a B.S., M.S., PhD.

Well, ain't that special that you have been trained in the darkened wisdom of mankind.
Some may mean well but all man knows if what he sees and feels so man is pretty ignorant on what's really going on.

Anybody that does not know the Lord and understands His Word via the Holy Spirit Whom Jesus sent to lead and guide man in to all truth, God's Word IS Truth, it not educated in what actually matters.
 

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
15,973
3,379
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I get your point, it's just that we are not Martin Luther and people don't know who we are, yet we are welcomed into a great place here, where it's formatted to express one's ideas of faith.
The difference between God's Word and Christian doctrine is all about the interpretation of it, is it not?

I refuse to believe that even in these last days, that God has not provided the means for His servants to understand Bible prophecy coming to pass. He instead points us to look when we are not intentionally looking. So not everyone is in a state of confusion; not everyone is heeding the doctrines of men.

We are visitors here, so don't fret if people disagree with your interpretation.

When other brethren don't believe what I've shown from Bible Scripture, that's not what angers me. What angers me is when they flat 'deny' the actual Bible Scripture as written, and try to supplant what it says in clarity instead with ideas from man.
 

boltupright

Member
Apr 27, 2026
22
11
18
64
Vancouver B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
I refuse to believe that even in these last days, that God has not provided the means for His servants to understand Bible prophecy coming to pass. He instead points us to look when we are not intentionally looking. So not everyone is in a state of confusion; not everyone is heeding the doctrines of men.
I refuse to believe this as well, however not everyone is going to accept your revelations as it is just second hand knowledge to them.
There is a time, place and method of presenting one's alternate interpretations.
The doctrines of men has stood the test of time, if one is presenting new concepts outside of accepted doctrine, it will indeed cause one to challenge such things.
To the believer, confusion is not part of the plan of God, so if to try to ever tell a doctrine devoted Christian that they are confused is redundant, and has no place in ministry.
It is a matter of convincing others with valid argument in clear comprehended debate.
When other brethren don't believe what I've shown from Bible Scripture, that's not what angers me. What angers me is when they flat 'deny' the actual Bible Scripture as written, and try to supplant what it says in clarity instead with ideas from man.
Don't let yourself ever and I do mean ever let anger come into debate as that is derived from pride.
Not everyone sees scripture referance same as you do, so don't take it personally.
This will translate in what you write and will shut the Spirit of the message down!
Whatever you present is in God's hands and if a seed is planted on good soil, it will grow depending on the merit behind the message.
If anger comes into the conversation, it's time to move on and come back to it with a clear heart and mind.
Never present your interpretation as an absolute, keep an open mind for rebuttal.
One last thing, is to address and always answer a clear question, don't ever avoid questions, it is best to just admit you just don't know and be done with it, or no-one will ever listen to you.

My hope is that you take what I say as constructive criticism and not a rebuke as I admire your passion for getting what you believe is from God, to others.

God bless!

boltupright.
 
Last edited:

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
15,973
3,379
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Don't let yourself ever and I do mean ever let anger come into debate as that is derived from pride.
Not everyone sees scripture referance same as you do, so don't take it personally.
This will translate in what you write and will shut the Spirit of the message down!
Whatever you present is in God's hands and if a seed is planted on good soil, it will grow depending on the merit behind the message.
If anger comes into the conversation, it's time to move on and come back to it with a clear heart and mind.
Never present your interpretation as an absolute, keep an open mind for rebuttal.
One last thing, is to address and always answer a clear question, don't ever avoid questions, it is best to just admit you just don't know and be done with it, or no-one will ever listen to you.

My hope is that you take what I say as constructive criticism and not a rebuke as I admire your passion for getting what you believe is from God, to others.

God bless!

boltupright.

I don't confuse contending for the Faith with self-pride. Christ's servants are to have a little saltiness. And that is especially for when men blatantly corrupt The Word of God...

 

boltupright

Member
Apr 27, 2026
22
11
18
64
Vancouver B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
I don't confuse contending for the Faith with self-pride. Christ's servants are to have a little saltiness. And that is especially for when men blatantly corrupt The Word of God...
I'm not saying your confused in any way, just saying it is pride that manifests anger in a debate.
Then your message gets corrupted by an emotion.
That's a fact.
It's tough for the Spirit to move in that environment.
If you are in a debate and your contender "blatantly corrupts" scripture, it is best to let it go and move on, than to keep insisting on trying to convince that person.
Remember others may be watching and if you blow it with one person, it can cause a chain reaction to where many in the the community will not even listen to you.
Think of the cost!
Your message may be too progressive for others to accept and if you can deal with it a cirtain way, it can be at least considered.
Some eat food easy to digest, and are satisfied.
Some that want rare steak are out there, hopefully prepared and tested beforehand and I mean both the presenter and the ones who have ears to hear the message.
I'm just saying your methods could use some attention to detail.
My motive is to see you succeed in your ventures.

God bless you!

boltupright.
 
Last edited:

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
15,973
3,379
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
I'm not saying your confused in any way, just saying it is pride that manifests anger in a debate.
Then your message gets corrupted by an emotion.
That's a fact.
It's tough for the Spirit to move in that environment.
If you are in a debate and your contender "blatantly corrupts" scripture, it is best to let it go and move on, than to keep insisting on trying to convince that person.
Remember others may be watching and if you blow it with one person, it can cause a chain reaction to where many in the the community will not even listen to you.
Think of the cost!
Your message may be too progressive for others to accept and if you can deal with it a cirtain way, it can be at least considered.
Some eat food easy to digest, and are satisfied.
Some that want rare steak are out there, hopefully prepared and tested beforehand and I mean both the presenter and the ones who have ears to hear the message.
I'm just saying your methods could use some attention to detail.
My motive is to see you succeed in your ventures.

God bless you!

boltupright.

That's pacifist Liberal-Leftist philosophy, not Biblical. No wonder so many of today's pastors are afraid to correct their sinning Church members... afraid they might hurt someone's feelings...

1 Tim 5:20
20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
KJV
 

boltupright

Member
Apr 27, 2026
22
11
18
64
Vancouver B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
That's pacifist Liberal-Leftist philosophy, not Biblical. No wonder so many of today's pastors are afraid to correct their sinning Church members... afraid they might hurt someone's feelings...

1 Tim 5:20
20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
KJV
Can one lead a horse to living water?
I guess you're not thirsty right now.:)

God bless!

boltupright.
 
Last edited:

boltupright

Member
Apr 27, 2026
22
11
18
64
Vancouver B.C.
Faith
Christian
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
That's pacifist Liberal-Leftist philosophy, not Biblical. No wonder so many of today's pastors are afraid to correct their sinning Church members... afraid they might hurt someone's feelings...

1 Tim 5:20
20 Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
KJV
I was going to let this go, however, I feel led to shake the dust from off my feet first.
Your own words prove me right as obviously you are a bit shaken by my comments to you.
Not that it's important for me to right, but it's important that you are.
You immediately make a judgement call and basically say that I am a pacifist, who holds to liberal leftist philosophy and am un Biblical..
I simply offered some advice, not my philosophy or statement of faith.
How can you possibly make that call by what I previously posted to you?
Why would I choose to listen to anything you say now?
Do you actually care or is it all about what you say here and not what others say?
Is it all about what others hear, you say?
Choose your words carefully, spartan.
Sorry if this hurts your feelings.

God bless!

boltupright.
 
Last edited:

Davy

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2018
15,973
3,379
113
Southeastern U.S.
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Can one lead a horse to living water?
I guess you're not thirsty right now.:)

God bless!

boltupright.

I'm never thirsty for Leftist-Liberal pacifist dogma. Didn't you ever wonder why Jesus told His disciples in Luke 22 to go buy a sword for those who didn't have one?

And just in case you didn't know, teaching pacification and disarmament doctrines in the Church was one of the Communist Soviet's long range strategic disinformation points against the Christian west. Moscow even holds religious summits inviting western Christian pastors so as to push Social religion.

"27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with 'social religion'. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a 'religious crutch.'" (from ex-FBI agent Cleon Skousen's 1958 book The Naked Communist)​