David in NJ
Well-Known Member
You made a BIG ERROR my brother in ChristIn terms of the context of 1 Corinthians 15:20-23, only Christ himself is said to be the firstfruits. It should say "firstfruit" since it's only Him. He is the firstfruit of the dead in Christ. It's not saying they are the firstfruits. It's saying Christ is the firstfruit(s) of those who slept (the dead in Christ).
If the dead in Christ are part of the first resurrection, then there is no second resurrection and no order to the resurrections. Yet, Paul said "each in his own order". Without Christ's first resurrection there would be no second resurrection in order at His second coming. A first resurrection implies a second. So, what is the second resurrection in your view?
"CHRIST is the firstfruits of, of, of those who have fallen sleep"
When it says "of" it means Christ is part of = those who have fallen asleep