I seem to have completely lost track of the conversation. Sorry about that.
God bless,
Mick
1Now I say that as long as the heir is a child, he differs in no way from a slave, though he is the owner of everything.
2Instead, he is under guardians and stewards until the time set by his father.
so it might be seen that when the heir matures, he is no longer under the "the servants."
Job was guilty--although we have lost the sense of this in the Christian Job story--of keeping the Law,
and of not having a relationship with God, which is reflected in our relationships with others, i guess.
we--or at least i--often seek to deal with the people in our lives correctly, but without really getting involved, perhaps.
there is a sacrifice in taking an interest in someone else's life, so to speak--at least if the person does not interest you,
but God has like put them in your face or whatever? Those people who are drawn to you, but you are not drawn to them?
That you keep at arm's length or whatever? (And your friends treat you like a guest)
and i have no idea where this is coming from Mick--the culmination of a lot of study of Job i guess; prolly for someone else ok
but Esau and Jacob even make more sense in this light...even if Esau was "Father's" favorite, haven't figured that part out yet lol