My faith is Christ.
“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only e begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him. He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil. For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But he who practices the truth comes to the Light, so that his deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God.”
You are under no obligation to answer. I do not confuse your ideas about embracing the Mosaic Law with your faith itself. But consider which is more important to you - clinging to the Law or entering into that which the Law foreshadowed.
You still haven't addressed my questions:
"What benefit do you see to changing God's laws? Do you really think you can improve upon God's laws?"
You didn't address this post either:
"The early church, including gentile converts kept the Sabbath along with the rest of the Mosaic law because that was what was required, not just in order to convert to Judaism, but as a consequence of becoming a child of God.
Notice what the book of Acts has to say on the subject:
"Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God:"
Luke is pointing out that they don't need to give an exhaustive list of offenses to these recently converted Gentiles, but he does point out that there are some things which do need to be address, most especially what follows:
"20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood."
These are all right from the Mosaic law. These seem to be the most egregious problems with gentile converts at that time, but they were by no means the only problems, which is why he then says this:
"21 For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day."
They can go to the synagogues on the Sabbath to hear all of God's commandments, and learn how to keep them there.
Prior to a gentile becoming a member of the chosen people, a Jew could give or sell them animals that had not been properly slaughtered according to the dietary laws. If a Jew had a pig on their property, they could also sell it to a gentile as well. Once a gentile converted to Judaism, this was no longer an option for them anymore. This is exactly the same case with the church because the church was still a sect of Judaism. The only difference being they believed Jesus was the messiah.
The thought that Sunday replaced Saturday as the Sabbath is wrong.
True. So why don't Christians keep the Sabbath anymore?
The point of Sunday is the New Covenant (new creation, the kingdom here) having entered into Christ's Sabbath through rebirth.
This is unbiblical. It's also a Non Sequitur. Christ himself ushered in the New Covenant, and he never stopped keeping the Sabbath.
In other words, the Sabbath has been fulfilled,
Christ fulfilled all of the law, therefore according to your logic, all of the law has been fulfilled.
Christians have entered into this Rest, and Christ's resurrection teaches us to worship EVERYDAY.
And rest every day. Therefore there is no need or desire to work at all."
All you're doing is making claims with nothing to back any of it up. Nobody is ignorant of your position. We don't need to be reminded of what it is repeately.
I have simply pointed out the flaws in your position which you have ignored. If the law is done away with, then the whole law is done away with which is probably why so many Christians claim that they are no longer married to their spouses anymore. They married to Christ. See how that works? They don't even have to go through those silly ceremonies anymore because those were just for Jews under the law.
What better way to absolve oneself from sin than to simply ignore the law completely? No law means no sin, and more importantly, no need for a savior which is what Paul must mean when he says, "therefore there is no more sacrifice for sin". If you can't transgress non existent laws, then you certainly don't need a savior.