Waiting on him
Well-Known Member
Allowing an individual to suffer eternal torment.can you define what you mean by " immortalizing sin " ?
One individual here said He finds it pleasurable, I won’t call any names.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Allowing an individual to suffer eternal torment.can you define what you mean by " immortalizing sin " ?
A different individual claims we get to observe their torment, I suppose from the balcony.Allowing an individual to suffer eternal torment.
One individual here said He finds it pleasurable, I won’t call any names.
You find this amusing? Nice straw man, by the way. Of course I intend to overcome, but 30 years ago, I wasn't so sure. See you in the funny papers.
A different individual claims we get to observe their torment, I suppose from the balcony.
I've found that when folks have to use words like "clearly" and "obviously," there's likely some slight angst or vulnerability brewing in their cases.
What do you suppose was in the cup Jesus drank and said the sons of thunder would also drink?Maybe they think they are a Holy angel...?
Rev 14
[9] And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
[10] The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
I sounds like you've taken over both sides of the discussion now.Oh, so you believe in the preconcieved idea that the unsaved wicked have been given "eternal souls".
If so, then you also believe that all animal life have been given eternal souls too.
I mean, they also have the breath of life in their nostrils too.
So the questions remain,
1. What exactly is "the breath of life"?
2. What does the word "soul" describe?
Ref. KJV (1.) Genesis 2:7; 6:17; 7:21-22 and (2.) Genesis 4:10.
They're not related to each other.I've been on other forums where UR is prohibited as well. Both are dangerous doctrines.
I never said they were but I know people who believe both heresies.They're not related to each other.
I was. Try to keep up.Yes that struck me as funny.
Who was talking about 30 yrs ago, or being unsure. I wasn't.
Personally I don't like the doctrine but its biblical and true.Allowing an individual to suffer eternal torment.
One individual here said He finds it pleasurable, I won’t call any names.
Hope you're not holding your breath. :)No one has yet to answer a question presented, how is God just in immortalizing sin?
I believe this is an important question, and for those who have it all worked out, what say ye?
Did you read the post I asked you to respond to?I was. Try to keep up.
We've been over that.If they knew that it would cost them being in eternal torments it might change their mind.
I must have missed the discussion on the issue...care to recap?We've been over that.
I think it is misguided. Off the top of my head, I cannot refute scripturally. I know that the angels are most often mentioned separately from us when it comes to final punishment, but I don't see that as an indication that justice will be any different for them than for us. All unrepentant sinners (human and angelic) will suffer corresponding to their exact level of guilt. Anything else would be unjust. I'll try to look into your reasoning more extensively as soon as I can get to it. I'll shoot for tomorrow night at the latest.Edited:
No, I didn't. I wonder why? I certainly don't believe that about Satan and his angels. Maybe that is what they are against. Would you do me a favor, and go to page 11, #209 and read my thoughts. Can you refute scripturally? These are just my reasoning; I've never heard anyone teach this, and just wonder if anyone else wondered why Peter said it would be better for someone to never be saved, than to be saved, then turn to apostasy. Same thing in Hebrews 6. I don't think it relates to Hebrews 10 though.