Thanks for the font. It does help although I have found the worst thing that people do in their posts is to run them with no effort to make paragraphs. Knowing the proper way to make paragraphs according to the English teacher is not to me the most important thing for I have trouble with that myself. The answer for it is to break those lengthy run-together writing small segments with spaces in between to be read and even re-read one at the time. Sometimes on unfamiliar or complex issues I may read them several and still miss the point and never answer or respond. What my mind once did well it doesn't do so well any more and the eyes don't help...
You keep on trying and so do I on the issue, the diversified oneness thing. I know I have discussed it with you before, but being honest it still does not really come clear to me. I cannot be a Trinitarian because while people can cite verses, they usually have already filled in the gaps or eliminated any real problems in their own minds according what they have decided is the correct answer. I have questions that none of them have been able to answer with anything better than for me to effectively accept it according to their faith. I cannot do that any more than I can espouse diversified oneness according to your understanding or your faith.
The verse I gave you [John 17:11] for me supports either one God alone [one person?] or a multiplicity in which could include you or me as part of the Godhead. To limit it to three would be an arbitrary thing on the part of someone who was trimming the jigsaw puzzle to make it fit. Of course for any one who has ever worked a jigsaw puzzle would realize that there would present a problem in ever finishing the puzzle correctly. It one of the most serious ones for me against the Trinity. No one has ever given me a good answer to which favors the Trinity. Many people have ignored it when I inserted it as a question. There are others...
Technically I grew up as a Trinitarian in the Catholic Church, but I did not even own a Bible much less read one in those days. It was prior to Vatican II and they did not read the whole Bible at their masses then. On the Trinity I simply accepted what the priests and nuns told me. There was a Trinity because they said so and to my knowledge they never purposely lied to me.
My transition or really my beginning to considering the nature of God, that is the Godhead, came in the UPC about 14 years after I stopped regularly attendance at mass. Early on as I studied with the Oneness Jesus Only people and began reading my Bible for myself. I saw what they meant, but when I left oneness after 11 years I went to a group that embraced neither Trinitarian nor Oneness Jesus Only doctrines. They helped me understand the errors of the others, but without making clear what was correct. Eventually God showed me problems with them too, but by that time it was too late for any man I knew to easily shake me on some things. There was no man around, [that I knew], who was honestly pursuing and not already rather heavily indoctrinated on certain points. After backsliding from them for 10 years I came back to God with a truly new leaf, a leaf that was striving to follow the lead of the Holy Spirit in all Bible reading and studying. That began in 2002. A lot has happened since then. I used to have lengthy in depth discussions with Trinitarians in particular, but I haven't changed much if any in that regard.
Some time ago you came up with this apparently new thing for me, this diversified oneness, but by that time my own slipping mind was unable to grasp exactly what you were saying. I did recognize that my own vision of it [the Godhead] was blurry as far as most people were concerned. I know what I see or understand, but it is still quite shadowy to most others. God knows and shows me things at times which help me, but not necessarily easy for me to explain to other with regard to this subject.
Someone here mentioned Moses as the type or shadow, but it is Joseph, the son of Jacob/Israel that for me gives me my picture/vision of Him. As Joseph was to Pharaoh, so is Jesus to God... but what does that mean?
"Thou shalt be over my house, and according unto thy word shall all my people be ruled: only in the throne will I be greater than thou." Gen 41:40
And then follow that with this:
"For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.
And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all." I Cor 15:27-28
And then this:
"But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom." Heb 1:8
No Multiplicity so no Trinity. Only One God for the scriptures are clear to me on that... but in breaking things down like people want to do and explaining it so everyone else and 'me too' understand it all... No! Yet people insist that I need to take this side or that side, God has given me a different way of looking at that: Only He knows the ATs [Absolute Truths] of it and when I really need to know something according to His definition of need, it will be given to me.