Never heard of such a thing.The fact that the way to life is narrow might indicate that it is the fewer of the texts that will contain the truth that leads to life, rather than the majority of them?
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Never heard of such a thing.The fact that the way to life is narrow might indicate that it is the fewer of the texts that will contain the truth that leads to life, rather than the majority of them?
It sure is.It is human Monday morning quarterbacks that are rethinking all of this.
Lots of people who do at times, I believe, really have, or have had, an unction, disagree with others who also have had an unction. It boils down to the difference between Saul the King a, or have nd David the King, both anointed as King of Israel by Samuel. Too many people quench the Spirit in them too often and fill in too many gaps with their own logical [or illogical] studies. But each one is certain that he is right and the other guy disagreeing must be the one in error:I would only say that if we have an unction from the holy one, we know all things and do not need any man to teach us (1 John 2:20, 1 John 2:27).
Hebrews 3-4 (among many others; John 14:15; Exodus 20:6; Isaiah 56:1,8; John 10:16; Isaiah 56:2-7, Acts 4:24, 14:15; Revelation 10:6, 14:6-7, &c).Heb 4:4, For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.
Heb 4:5, And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.
Heb 4:6, Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:
Heb 4:7, Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
Heb 4:8, For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.
Heb 4:9, There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God.
Heb 4:10, For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.
Heb 4:11, Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.
Heb 4:12, For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
That makes sense...thank you!Hi Mary,
While Jesus may have been calling Peter "satan", He may have just the same been calling Peter the Adversary, as that is what the word means. It would still be with a sting, but not necessarily calling Peter the devil.
Much love!
you reject His Deity since you claim He lost His Omni Attributes which is a direct contradiction of Colossians 1:19 and Colossians 2:9. And since you cannot exegete Colossians I will help you out.When people do not have an accurate knowledge of who God is, it is expedient to show them the truth. Jesus even did contend with the Pharisees in John chapter 8 as concerning their rejection of His Deity.
Amen otherwise we are gods ourselves. :)I don't want a god whom I can understand fully. I'm glad I'm not as smart as some of the people I've come across on the Interweb. This thought has nagged me for many years. If I knew as much about God as the collective of people I've encountered within the last 20 years or so, I fear I'd have little, if anything, left to learn. So many people seem to be so sure about so much. It's truly baffling.
Isn't this just a tad bit of a straw man? Honestly.you reject His Deity since you claim He lost His Omni Attributes
Not if you begin with God and His nature- the divine attributes that make God, God. Whatever can be said of the Father and the Holy Spirit can be said of the Son and vice versa with Deity. In Colossians 1:19 and 2:9 we read that all the Fulness of Deity dwells in Christ bodily. So there is nothing lacking, hence He has all the fulness of Deity in Him.Isn't this just a tad bit of a straw man? Honestly.
What I meant was: Isn't it a bit of a stretch to accuse someone of denying the deity of Christ just because they don't see eye-to-eye with you on the logistics of the Godhead? After all, how much can we really know about the intricacies of an entity that is triune? And how well do we define the word "deity?" We're treading on holy ground here. Shouldn't we remove our proverbial sandals? Is all of this stuff as elementary as we depict it?Not if you begin with God and His nature- the divine attributes that make God, God. Whatever can be said of the Father and the Holy Spirit can be said of the Son and vice versa with Deity. In Colossians 1:19 and 2:9 we read that all the Fulness of Deity dwells in Christ bodily. So there is nothing lacking, hence He has all the fulness of Deity in Him.
hope this helps !!!
The law may be the law in a sense, but not all law is the same. There is such a thing as over-simplification. Punching someone in the nose isn't the same as killing millions of people. The law is the law when one keeps all of it, as Jesus did. But when it's broken there are varying degrees of offense.Yes.
Case in point, the very first command to Adam was a Law.
The very last book of the O.T. was Laws to Israel.(God was making Laws all through the Prophets).
Ignoring all these Laws and only focusing on Mosaic Law would be unwise if you lived in Israel in the O.T. days.
Jesus considered all of God's laws, Law.
Don't you know my friend that you not supposed to understand it... just accept it because "I said so"? Lots of Protestants [supposedly any non-Catholic claiming to be a follower of Christ] strongly opposed to Catholicism generally but equally strong in their support of the Trinitarian position that differs little if any from the Catholic position on it... Yet it is all by faith. People are mixed up on this for certain. They insist their "faith" is in the right things, whereas any other Catholic or Protestant who disagrees on a point of faith is in error. Do people accept these penned words of Paul as an accurate description of what faith is?What I meant was: Isn't it a bit of a stretch to accuse someone of denying the deity of Christ just because they don't see eye-to-eye with you on the logistics of the Godhead? After all, how much can we really know about the intricacies of an entity that is triune? And how well do we define the word "deity?" We're treading on holy ground here. Shouldn't we remove our proverbial sandals? Is all of this stuff as elementary as we depict it?
I'm getting the impression you don't care much for dogma. ;)Don't you know my friend that you not supposed to understand it... just accept it because "I said so"? Lots of Protestants [supposedly any non-Catholic claiming to be a follower of Christ] strongly opposed to Catholicism generally but equally strong in their support of the Trinitarian position that differs little if any from the Catholic position on it... Yet it is all by faith. People are mixed up on this for certain. They insist their "faith" is in the right things, whereas any other Catholic or Protestant who disagrees on a point of faith is in error. Do people accept these penned words of Paul as an accurate description of what faith is?
"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen" Heb 11:1
What are we hoping for...?
Certainly not what our carnal flesh desires!
"...nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt."
In your faith be sure you are a Trinitarian!
In your faith be sure you are opposed to the Trinity!
In your faith be sure you are against the Democratic Party!
In your faith be sure you are against the Socialists!
In your faith be sure you are against tongue talkers!
In your faith be sure you are where I am!
In your faith be sure you believing in that particular written Creed!
Next AT [Absolute Truth]...?
LOL Have I given you that impression? By the way, what is dogma? LOLI'm getting the impression you don't care much for dogma. ;)
you reject His Deity
All the FULLNESS of DEITY dwells in bodily form. Col 2:9. Jesus was and is fully God lacking nothing in His Deity.
you are not a trinitarian, God is not parts or 1/3 of anything. Now you are espousing tritheism.Prove it.
No, actually, it is only 1/3 of God that dwells in Jesus Christ. Or, maybe a 2nd God.
![]()
I was espousing what I believe to be your estimation of the Trinity.you are not a trinitarian, God is not parts or 1/3 of anything. Now you are espousing tritheism.
YIKES...........................