just not biblical
only God can forgive sins? Really?
John 20:21-23
21 Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
23 Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.
paul says
2 Cor 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ
2 Corinthians 5:18
And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;
only the apostles have ministry
All may be ambassadors but only the apostles have authority to teach Matt 28:19 the people are being taught and made disciples by baptism
the great commission is only to the apostles and their successors
It is not our blood that forgives sin, it is not our power that does this, we as believers are steward's of the Grace of God, the ministry of reconciliation is pointing a person to the cross where the blood of Jesus cleanses the sinner, We as ambassadors do forgive those who trespass against us, but our forgiveness apart from the blood of Christ is powerless. I said so in my comment, perhaps you missed it, here it is....
and we are all called to forgive those who have offended us and restore them to their rightful relationship should they repent, But the Forgiveness of sins and the washing is Of God by the Blood of the Lamb.
To claim otherwise is to make of the blood of God of none effect. Telling us that we have to add our forgiveness in order for forgiveness to occur. We as ambassadors of his grace are called to forgive those who offend us, in the hopes of God Bringing them to repentance, Just as Stephen did while being Stoned in the presence of Saul. And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep. (Acts 7:60) This sort of selfless act of forgiveness is what John 20:21-23 speaks of.
To be an apostle means to be Sent, a sent one. We are all "sent" to make disciples, the great commission is a mandate for every Believer, not just a select class of priests, we are all priests, we are all brothers.
Jesus In His High priestly prayer said the following: As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world. (speaking of the Apostles) And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth. Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word; (Notice how now he extends this promise to all who believe their ministry) That they all may be one; as thou, Father,
art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. (John 17:18-21), (Thus we all are sent and are one)
The Opposite of this is what Nicolaitanism is all about. Nico means to rule over to conquer, Laitan means the people, the the laity. This group of people committed Balaam's error, that is to seek gain from the gifts given them in the form of power and wealth from the people/laity. This is exactly what many church hierarchies do What the Vatican does, what the prosperity preachers do, and Jesus says he hates this mindset, because it robs the glory from God, and causes the laity to remain suckling on the breast rather than going out and fulfilling the great commission. Which also again, violates Jesus' teaching in Matthew 23:4-12.
Again, this is not just a catholic problem, but stems all denominations and churches, For example , no doctrine has done more to thwart the Great commission than Calvinism does, with their limited atonement, this is nothing more than a Nicolaitan doctrine denies certain men salvation while granting it to a select group who are predestined. But this is another subject.
So the question for you is, are you going to blindly follow the Nicolaitans in the Vatican, Or are you willing to make Christ the head, your all in all, and become a member of the true body of Christ, where we are all Brethren in Christ Jesus, in a unity of the Spirit, not of ecumenism, and a unity of Balaam's error?