Love ya too, but she might have asked for negative feedback when posting it here but we (her responders) didn't.
Is it negativity to care about people who would be doing their future a disservice by agreeing to be injected with mRNA vaccine?
We read the naysayer(s) that push the mRNA vaccine and insult and condemn physicians with enormous credentials to their credit who put their career and name on the line warning against this virus. And some in that group are not in any way credentialed in their rebuttal of the physicians who know of what they speak when they warn against this vaccine. And being this is the internet they claim they're married to someone who knows the vaccines are safe. Really?
Someone who claims their wife knows what she's talking about, but she isn't a member, casts aspersions and insults upon physicians who go on the record with not just their credentials, but the scientific data that forewarns this mRNA vaccine is not safe and who are we here suppose to believe? The guy who claims to married to someone who says, go for it, get the shot?
I never insulted anyone who got the vaccine. They're life is now forever changed. They may insult those of us who feel for them and pray for them and they even mock that however, for my part, pushing back against the pro-vaccine non-credible pusher mentality here with the scientific evidence afforded by credentialed physicians who show their face, and provide the data against mRNA, isn't negative. It's a positive.
People need to be informed fully that if they choose to get the vaccine what they're facing.
It isn't right, it isn't moral, it isn't fair, to let a pro-mRNA vaccine agenda repeat itself ad nausea and when there is evidence out there that warns against that vaccine, let that remain muted and not brought to peoples attention with equal vigor.
