You wouldn't say that if you had actually read the article you're quoting, which mentions both the vaccines in current use in the UK. Most people are now getting the Oxford vaccine.
You mean to say the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.
And the article, that I linked after I read it, does not state that most people are now getting the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. But you've said you don't know what pharmaceutical company produced the vaccine you allegedly received because you don't have a concern with having that knowledge. I find that odd and personally irresponsible, but you are you and I am me. (Thank God for that difference, right? Yep, I got ya. ;))
If you'd have read the article I linked you'd know that you did receive an experimental vaccine. And of course you did because all vaccine produced to address Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 , are experimental because Covid-19 is a new viral strain. (And it mutates, of course)
From that article: In our view, all of these reasons should make the government reconsider their strategy. If they are determined to continue with the delayed second dose, then a robust randomized evaluation is urgently required. Furthermore, if there is an apparently plentiful supply of the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine, which is being rolled out at pace and for which there is a scientific basis for a delay in second dose, is there really a need for the mRNA delayed strategy?
No. I don't have the same issues with vaccines that you have.
Clearly. I would insist on knowing what pharmaceutical company provided experimental Covid-19 vaccine that I was agreeing to let be injected into my body and consequently forever impact my future.