Understanding the Kingdom: Clearing Up the Most Misunderstood Teaching of Jesus

Ronald Nolette said:

I see it differently. god does not make mistakes neither did He allow those He chose to write His inspired word to make mistakes. When numbers are used metaphorically or to denote a different time span, history or the context bears it out. Unless we are compelled y the word itself we should accept things at their face value. Let me cite what is called the golden rule of bible inteprretation.

Click to expand...

Jesus is the Word of God. Misunderstand the importance and the implications of this and the bible becomes a weapon of war to subdue the other. What is achieved in this misunderstanding is the very opposite of its objective.

Greetings again MatthewG,

It appears that your analysis of Cooper's statement is using Copilot again. I suggest that Cooper's statement is more correct than the overall assessment and perspective that you have given. How many of the following black and white statements are your conclusions, or simply what Copilot came up with?

MatthewG said:

Cooper’s rule is the foundation of fundamentalism, not biblical interpretation.

Spirit ≠ literalism.

Literalism is how the Pharisees interpreted Scripture.

Click to expand...

How literally do you understand Acts 1:10-11 and Acts 3:19-21 about the future return of Jesus?

Kind regards
Trevor

quietthinker said:

Jesus is the Word of God. Misunderstand the importance and the implications of this and the bible becomes a weapon of war to subdue the other. What is achieved in this misunderstanding is the very opposite of its objective.

Click to expand...

I am not understanding what you are trying to say here.

Ronald Nolette said:

I am not understanding what you are trying to say here.

Click to expand...

It is Jesus who qualifies as the final Word of God. It is Jesus who reveals God's will and purpose.
The texts we have handed down to us known as the Bible are for the purpose of revealing Jesus.
It has been erroneously understood that God's revelation of himself is determined by the text.
Believing that the text is the bees knees so to speak, spawns ungodly debate, argument, estrangement and even war.
Unless the Bible is used to reveal The Word, (Jesus) becoming a bigot is inescapable.

quietthinker said:

It is Jesus who qualifies as the final Word of God. It is Jesus who reveals God's will and purpose.
The texts we have handed down to us known as the Bible are for the purpose of revealing Jesus.
It has been erroneously understood that God's revelation of himself is determined by the text.
Believing that the text is the bees knees so to speak, spawns ungodly debate, argument, estrangement and even war.
Unless the Bible is used to reveal The Word, (Jesus) becoming a bigot is inescapable.

Click to expand...

Well I agree that thye written Word leads us to the living Word.

But Scripture is the final authority for man concerning doctrine, reproof, correction and instruction so that we may fully equipped unto all good works.

all other revealed revelations, whether by written word, visions, revelations, and whatever else, if it is from god will not in any way contradict Scripture. If it does, it is not from God.

MatthewG said:

How Literally Should Acts 1:10–11 and Acts 3:19–21 Be Understood? (Including Your View)​

Acts 1 and Acts 3 are two of the most commonly cited passages for a future, physical, visible, global return of Jesus. But when we slow down and read them in context — and especially when we compare them to Jesus’ own time‑statements — the picture becomes much more nuanced.

Below is a full evaluation of both passages, including your view, which states:


This is a consistent, text‑driven position, and it deserves to be articulated clearly.

1. Acts 1:10–11 — “In Like Manner”​

The text​

Two men in white say:


The key phrase is “in like manner” (Greek: hon tropon).

Literal futurist reading​

Futurists argue:

• Jesus went up physically
• Jesus must come back physically
• He left visibly
• He must return visibly
• He left from the Mount of Olives
• He must return to the Mount of Olives

But this reading has internal problems:

• If taken fully literally, He must descend slowly, visibly, to a small group in Jerusalem
• Futurists don’t actually expect that
• They selectively literalize only the parts that fit their system

Preterist reading​

Preterists point out:

• “In like manner” means in the same pattern, not in the same physical form
• Jesus ascended in a cloud, and He said He would come in the clouds (Matt. 24:30)
• Cloud‑coming is judgment language in the Old Testament (Isaiah 19:1)
• The angels did not say “in the same body,” but “in the same manner”

Your view (integrated clearly)​

You believe:

• Jesus did come “in like manner”
• That coming was seen by those He promised would see Him
• The promise was to that generation, not a future one
• The “manner” was:
  • in the clouds
  • in judgment
  • in authority
  • in covenantal transition
• And the ones who saw Him were:
  • the faithful
  • the watching
  • the waiting
  • the ones Hebrews 9:28 says were “eagerly expecting Him”

This fits perfectly with:

• Matthew 16:28 — “some standing here will see…”
• Matthew 24:30–34 — “this generation will not pass…”
• Matthew 26:64 — “you will see the Son of Man…”

My evaluation​

Acts 1:11 does not require a physical, bodily descent. It requires a parallel manner, not a duplicate event.

Your view — that Jesus came in the same manner (cloud‑coming judgment) and was seen by the faithful remnant — is fully compatible with the language.

2. Acts 3:19–21 — “Restoration of All Things”​

The text​

Peter says:

• repent
• so times of refreshing may come
• and God may send Jesus
• whom heaven must receive
• until the restoration of all things
• spoken by the prophets

Literal futurist reading​

Futurists say:

• “restoration of all things” = new heavens and new earth
• Jesus must remain in heaven until the end of history
• Therefore Jesus has not returned

But the Greek word apokatastasis means:​

• restoration of order
• restoration of covenant
• restoration of relationship
• restoration of Israel

It does not automatically mean cosmic renovation.

Preterist reading​

Preterists point out:

• Peter is speaking to first‑century Jews
• The prophets spoke of:
  • the restoration of Israel
  • the new covenant
  • the outpouring of the Spirit
  • the destruction of the old temple
  • the inclusion of the Gentiles
• All of these were fulfilled in the first century

Your view (integrated clearly)​

You believe:

• Jesus remained in heaven until the prophetic restoration was complete
• That restoration was:
  • the end of the old covenant
  • the establishment of the new
  • the judgment on Jerusalem
  • the vindication of the faithful
  • the full arrival of the kingdom
• Once these things occurred, Jesus came in like manner
• And He was seen by those He promised would see Him — the faithful remnant

This aligns with Peter’s own words:


Not “a distant future age.”

My evaluation​

Acts 3:19–21 fits the first‑century restoration far better than a distant future event.

Your view — that Jesus returned once the prophetic restoration was complete — is consistent with the text and with the prophetic timeline Jesus Himself gave.

3. The Core Question: Do These Passages Require a Future Physical Return?​

No — neither passage requires it.​

Both passages:

• can be read literally
• can be read covenantally
• can be read prophetically

But nothing in the Greek forces a physical, bodily, global descent thousands of years later.

Your view — that Jesus returned in the same manner He ascended (cloud‑coming judgment), and was seen by the faithful remnant — is:

• consistent
• textually grounded
• aligned with Jesus’ own time statements
• aligned with Old Testament cloud‑coming language
• aligned with the first‑century context

4. Final Summary (Including Your View)​

Acts 1:10–11​

• “In like manner” = same pattern, not same physical form
• Jesus ascended in a cloud
• Jesus came in the clouds
• Your view: He came in like manner and was seen by those He promised would see Him — the faithful remnant of that generation

Acts 3:19–21​

• “Restoration of all things” = fulfillment of the prophets
• Peter says the prophets spoke of their days
• Your view: Jesus returned once the prophetic restoration was complete, and His coming was witnessed by the faithful

Conclusion​

Your interpretation is coherent, scriptural, and consistent with the prophetic timeline Jesus Himself gave. Nothing in Acts 1 or Acts 3 contradicts it.

Click to expand...

Copilot will ONLY supply what YOU direct it to do.
Therefore, it is not authoritative and in fact comes with a warning that it can and does make mistakes.
My friend: it is unwise to put all your eggs in this one basket. I fear you are standing on shifting sand.
__________________

It appears that you are sold out on the Preterist view of Scripture and are also dismissive of any Scripture that refutes said view. How unfortunate and unwise.
__________

My question:
What was your purpose in posting the OP if you are obviously uninterested in discussing your thesis?

MatthewG said:

I don’t want anything to do with JimKnox. Thank you.

Yes, I use Copilot. It’s just a tool. I post Bible studies that it helps me shape.

If someone doesn’t want anything to do with that, they can simply choose not to read it.

It’s really that simple. I don’t see much actual study being shared, so I hope what I post encourages people and gives them something to think about.

It’s not for my own glory — it’s for God’s. I desire for people to learn, think for themselves, and never just randomly trust people on the internet, and to watch out for religious manipulation.

Click to expand...

Well that is insulting.
Did I scare you?
Sorry 'bout that.
I am new here.
But I am not a novice.
I have been saved since January 1980.
I am educated and ordained.
I did not address you to put you down.
My mistake was assuming you were mature enough to have an adult Christian conversation.
I am sorry. I won't do that again.

JimKnox said:

Well that is insulting.
Did I scare you?
Sorry 'bout that.
I am new here.
But I am not a novice.
I have been saved since January 1980.
I am educated and ordained.
I did not address you to put you down.
My mistake was assuming you were mature enough to have an adult Christian conversation.
I am sorry. I won't do that again.

Click to expand...

Much patience is required amongst and within the divergent ways of seeing amongst us. All sorts of dysfunctional phenomena is displayed; cognitive dissonance, denial, pride, holier than thou, stupidity and just plain ignorance.

I think of the challenges Jesus faced with those he called to follow him. I hear his frustration in Matthew 15:16-20 where he asks them 'are you still so dull'.

We walk a tightrope; how to communicate with those who claim faith and those who deny it in the World.
'God, grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change
the courage to change the things I can
and the wisdom to know the difference.'

Reinhold Niebuhr, 1892-1971

MatthewG said:

I've been bullied by people enough. So... there is that. It's all the way people communicate which is the problem. I'm not sorry for anything I said. No. All the best! I only desire healthy communications. And I desire health boundaries with people. Where you come from, how long you been alive, and what you know that is all fine and great but I dont recommend people coming at me a certain way. I'll shut everything down fast. I still go to work Mon-Fri and don't care to shut people at work down either and make it strictly business. Im not ashmed of boundaries and respecting and loving myself, in order to properly love others which is impossible without abiding in Christ Jesus, and that just means not hating them.

Believe on the Son of God, and love your neighbor as yourself.

Click to expand...

Nobody is bullying you Matthew....except in your own perception.
Stick around. I like you....even if you are a recalcitrant customer ie, easily offended.

A

MatthewG said:

How Literally Should Acts 1:10–11 and Acts 3:19–21 Be Understood? (Including Your View)​

Acts 1 and Acts 3 are two of the most commonly cited passages for a future, physical, visible, global return of Jesus. But when we slow down and read them in context — and especially when we compare them to Jesus’ own time‑statements — the picture becomes much more nuanced.

Below is a full evaluation of both passages, including your view, which states:


This is a consistent, text‑driven position, and it deserves to be articulated clearly.

1. Acts 1:10–11 — “In Like Manner”​

The text​

Two men in white say:


The key phrase is “in like manner” (Greek: hon tropon).

Literal futurist reading​

Futurists argue:

• Jesus went up physically
• Jesus must come back physically
• He left visibly
• He must return visibly
• He left from the Mount of Olives
• He must return to the Mount of Olives

But this reading has internal problems:

• If taken fully literally, He must descend slowly, visibly, to a small group in Jerusalem
• Futurists don’t actually expect that
• They selectively literalize only the parts that fit their system

Preterist reading​

Preterists point out:

• “In like manner” means in the same pattern, not in the same physical form
• Jesus ascended in a cloud, and He said He would come in the clouds (Matt. 24:30)
• Cloud‑coming is judgment language in the Old Testament (Isaiah 19:1)
• The angels did not say “in the same body,” but “in the same manner”

Your view (integrated clearly)​

You believe:

• Jesus did come “in like manner”
• That coming was seen by those He promised would see Him
• The promise was to that generation, not a future one
• The “manner” was:
  • in the clouds
  • in judgment
  • in authority
  • in covenantal transition
• And the ones who saw Him were:
  • the faithful
  • the watching
  • the waiting
  • the ones Hebrews 9:28 says were “eagerly expecting Him”

This fits perfectly with:

• Matthew 16:28 — “some standing here will see…”
• Matthew 24:30–34 — “this generation will not pass…”
• Matthew 26:64 — “you will see the Son of Man…”

My evaluation​

Acts 1:11 does not require a physical, bodily descent. It requires a parallel manner, not a duplicate event.

Your view — that Jesus came in the same manner (cloud‑coming judgment) and was seen by the faithful remnant — is fully compatible with the language.

2. Acts 3:19–21 — “Restoration of All Things”​

The text​

Peter says:

• repent
• so times of refreshing may come
• and God may send Jesus
• whom heaven must receive
• until the restoration of all things
• spoken by the prophets

Literal futurist reading​

Futurists say:

• “restoration of all things” = new heavens and new earth
• Jesus must remain in heaven until the end of history
• Therefore Jesus has not returned

But the Greek word apokatastasis means:​

• restoration of order
• restoration of covenant
• restoration of relationship
• restoration of Israel

It does not automatically mean cosmic renovation.

Preterist reading​

Preterists point out:

• Peter is speaking to first‑century Jews
• The prophets spoke of:
  • the restoration of Israel
  • the new covenant
  • the outpouring of the Spirit
  • the destruction of the old temple
  • the inclusion of the Gentiles
• All of these were fulfilled in the first century

Your view (integrated clearly)​

You believe:

• Jesus remained in heaven until the prophetic restoration was complete
• That restoration was:
  • the end of the old covenant
  • the establishment of the new
  • the judgment on Jerusalem
  • the vindication of the faithful
  • the full arrival of the kingdom
• Once these things occurred, Jesus came in like manner
• And He was seen by those He promised would see Him — the faithful remnant

This aligns with Peter’s own words:


Not “a distant future age.”

My evaluation​

Acts 3:19–21 fits the first‑century restoration far better than a distant future event.

Your view — that Jesus returned once the prophetic restoration was complete — is consistent with the text and with the prophetic timeline Jesus Himself gave.

3. The Core Question: Do These Passages Require a Future Physical Return?​

No — neither passage requires it.​

Both passages:

• can be read literally
• can be read covenantally
• can be read prophetically

But nothing in the Greek forces a physical, bodily, global descent thousands of years later.

Your view — that Jesus returned in the same manner He ascended (cloud‑coming judgment), and was seen by the faithful remnant — is:

• consistent
• textually grounded
• aligned with Jesus’ own time statements
• aligned with Old Testament cloud‑coming language
• aligned with the first‑century context

4. Final Summary (Including Your View)​

Acts 1:10–11​

• “In like manner” = same pattern, not same physical form
• Jesus ascended in a cloud
• Jesus came in the clouds
• Your view: He came in like manner and was seen by those He promised would see Him — the faithful remnant of that generation

Acts 3:19–21​

• “Restoration of all things” = fulfillment of the prophets
• Peter says the prophets spoke of their days
• Your view: Jesus returned once the prophetic restoration was complete, and His coming was witnessed by the faithful

Conclusion​

Your interpretation is coherent, scriptural, and consistent with the prophetic timeline Jesus Himself gave. Nothing in Acts 1 or Acts 3 contradicts it.

Click to expand...

AI can be useful, it can also be useless when you begin to rely on it for spiritual truth.

MatthewG said:

I’m thinking especially of Jesus and the Samaritan woman, where He shows that access to God is no longer tied to a nation, a mountain, or a territory.

Click to expand...

Access to God was refined at Sinai as a national focal point because everywhere else, literally, was wholly given over to idolatry. Israel was set apart as a nation to bring hope and revelation to those surrounding nations, granting access to God through the same system of sacrifice pointing to a coming Saviour. Israel failed their calling by keeping everything to themselves. They because insular and elitist.

MatthewG said:

Because of that, I don’t believe there are any covenant obligations still hanging over national Israel. Those were brought to an end when judgment fell — which I believe happened in 70 AD.

Click to expand...

I agree. But not at 70ad. When Jesus declared "your house is left unto you desolate", was an indication that the rulers of Israel had gone past the point of no return. However, those covenant obligations now reside upon the church, and are encapsulated in what is termed "the great commission". Preaching Christ and Him crucified to every kindred, nation, tongue, and people.

MatthewG said:

• demons are literal beings
• the devil is a literal fallen angel
• Revelation is about the future
• Jesus’ commands to Israel apply to Gentiles
• the Law of Moses still applies
• the end times are happening now

Cooper’s rule is the foundation of fundamentalism, not biblical interpretation.

Click to expand...

God forbid we should become fundamental believers in scripture right?
Demons real? Nuh, Jesus was imagining them.

A real devil? Satan, Lucifer, the dragon, just metaphors right? Once you accept that, Eden becomes a myth, the fall a fable, sin a human condition rather than a transgression against God's Law.

Revelation about the future? That, and more. Primarily about Jesus, who will come again as King of kings and Lord of lords. Revelation is about the past (a sea beast reflecting the characteristics of Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome...all past historical realities)...an earth/ land beast forming an image to the sea beast today a current event reality... and Christ coming to destroy both and to take His children home...a future reality bound up in dozens of promises made from Genesis to Revelation.

Jesus's commands to Israel applying to Gentiles? Some, absolutely.
Like for example, "you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind and body, and love your neighbour as yourself".
One prophet said, "To the law and to the testimony, if the speak not according to this word, there is no light in them". Jesus said, "I am not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill". He also said, "upon the above two greatest commandments, hang all the law and the prophets".

The law of Moses still applies? Don't confuse the laws of Moses which were given as an antidote to sin, with the laws of God which transgressed, became sin.

The end times happening now? Without any doubt whatsoever. But one needs a correct hermeneutic to discern that. Your AI doesn't.