Role of women in church and the household

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Wakka

Super Member
Jun 4, 2007
1,461
4
0
33
This topic has been tickling my fancy (lol) for quite some time. My church really emphasizes on this. That the husband is the head of the family, and the pastor of the family. I actually can see a hierarchy of power here.
God > Pastor > Husband > Family
1 Corinthians 14:34-35Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.I can see why this is important. God had set up a perfect system of marriage, but our way of life in America has perverted it. This is why we see so many dysfunctional marriages and divorces.Note: The husband cannot dictate the family, he cannot force the members to do things that go against God. He cannot be tyrannical to the wife, but instead take care of her and love her.Now I believe that women should wear dresses, and head coverings (if hair is short). This is due to respect for the Lord. Same goes to men tucking in their shirts, and looking clean. We're the body of Christ, we must present ourselves in a way to glorify the Lord.
smile.gif
Now what are your opinions?
 

RaddSpencer

New Member
Mar 28, 2008
285
0
0
44
(Wakka;47934)

God > Pastor > Husband > Family
Bleh, God is my only audience. I'll listen to his (pastor's) advice, but he is not in charge of me.(Wakka;47934)
I can see why this is important. God had set up a perfect system of marriage, but our way of life in America has perverted it. This is why we see so many dysfunctional marriages and divorces.Note: The husband cannot dictate the family, he cannot force the members to do things that go against God. He cannot be tyrannical to the wife, but instead take care of her and love her.
Dang right America has perverted it -- beyond belief. However, the rest of the western world has done the same thing. We will have to answer for this someday. Also, being hilariously tyrannical towards my future wife was my one goal in life -- AND NOW YOU RUINED IT -- thanks alot!(disclaimer --- that was a joke son, pay attention XD).(Wakka;47934)
Now I believe that women should wear dresses, and head coverings (if hair is short). This is due to respect for the Lord. Same goes to men tucking in their shirts, and looking clean. We're the body of Christ, we must present ourselves in a way to glorify the Lord.
smile.gif
Now what are your opinions?
Nah, I believe that people should come as they are, and I also don't believe that God wants us to be Mr. Business Casual on Sunday. I mean geez, if I wanted to act like an impersonal business man I would go to work.
 

koulourakia_girl

New Member
Apr 21, 2008
44
0
0
43
A while back I came across a really horrible, unbiblical doctrine, supposedly based on Scripture...it's that Man, and not Woman, was created in the Image of God. So I decided to investigate and come to the truth of the matter, constructing a three-part essay on the topic, in which I look at Women's roles too...and therefore examining the intent of verses in the NT that are used to denigrate Women...If anyone's interested, just check it out on my myspace blog....it's a public blog, so anyone can read...it's a three-parter called "Created in the Image of God."http://www.myspace.com/rjmihail
 

RaddSpencer

New Member
Mar 28, 2008
285
0
0
44
(koulourakia_girl;48190)
A while back I came across a really horrible, unbiblical doctrine, supposedly based on Scripture...it's that Man, and not Woman, was created in the Image of God. So I decided to investigate and come to the truth of the matter, constructing a three-part essay on the topic, in which I look at Women's roles too...and therefore examining the intent of verses in the NT that are used to denigrate Women...If anyone's interested, just check it out on my myspace blog....it's a public blog, so anyone can read...it's a three-parter called "Created in the Image of God."http://www.myspace.com/rjmihail
"26And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth." Gen 1:26-28That sums it up pretty much. I agree with everything you say, except for one thing. I think that God's maleness is indeed important. Throughout the bible, God is referred to using male nouns. HE, is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, not some sort of gender mix.You may be thinking, "if God insists on calling Himself male, what does this mean for us ladies". Well, if God insists on calling Himself, "He" --- there must be a "she" involved.7"Let us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb has come and His bride has made herself ready." 8It was given to her to clothe herself in fine linen, bright and clean; for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. 9Then he said to me, "Write, 'Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb '" And he said to me, "These are true words of God." Revelation 19:7-9To be honest about the situation, it doesn't make sense for men and women to hate each other or to beat each other down. The husband is the head of the wife, yes! However, as you know, the head cannot survive without the body, and the body cannot survive without the head. There is an interdependancy that happens between a husband and wife -- even though the husband is in charge. (I mean geez, just read the book of Esther).If men really think about what they want in a wife, they definitely would not want a woman who is intellectually or emotionally inferior. I mean, who would want a wife that couldn't understand anything? Who would want a wife than couldn't carry on an intelligent conversation? NO ONE.
 

koulourakia_girl

New Member
Apr 21, 2008
44
0
0
43
God is neither male nor female...there are reasons for the male pronouns used of God throughout Scripture. I discuss this in the blogs....
 

RaddSpencer

New Member
Mar 28, 2008
285
0
0
44
(koulourakia_girl;48352)
God is neither male nor female...there are reasons for the male pronouns used of God throughout Scripture. I discuss this in the blogs....
I've read the 3 part series, and the only part I disagree with is that God is not male. I think He is male as the day is long.
 

RaddSpencer

New Member
Mar 28, 2008
285
0
0
44
(koulourakia_girl;48363)
Why is God male? please explain...
Other than calling Himself "He" in the bible and the three parts of the trinity being:Father:Son:Holy Spirit:When God decided to dwell among us. He decided to be the SON of Man as well as the SON of God.http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/son-of-man.htmlHe came to earth as a man. He could have chosen to be either sex right. However, He decided to be male rather than female. He didn't have both genitalia either. This is significant, and it has to do with His desire towards the church.
 

treeoflife

New Member
Apr 30, 2008
601
0
0
41
I'll just say this. I believe firmly, that when Paul said that he suffers not a woman to teach... he meant as the apostolic, or pastoral place of teaching. A woman is not intended to be the head of a church... as the person in front, leading the pack.Women can certainly teach... we can learn a lot from women. They are the other half... and there are things in a woman's mind that help the man, and visa-versa. However, by God's Word, a woman should not be in the place of leadership of a body of believers. That is the way I see it, and I trust God that it is best that way.Also, if the husband has given permission to the wife (who should ask her husband at home), then by all means... speak. Perhaps the husband has decided that the wife has something to say, better, in a way that he could not. Would not the wife be disobeying to *not speak* in this occasion? Seeing as God has moved her, and her husband has approved?It is important that there is order of rule, and the husband is the leader. I should love my wife, at all times, and at all times she should submit to my leadership. If this is done, what can go wrong? I believe it was said that Sarah purified herself by following Abraham's lead? Even when he was taking her into danger? I cannot recall the specific verse, but if someone else can... by all means.
 

Wakka

Super Member
Jun 4, 2007
1,461
4
0
33
(koulourakia_girl;48352)
God is neither male nor female...there are reasons for the male pronouns used of God throughout Scripture. I discuss this in the blogs....
God wouldn't have a gender is it wasn't for Jesus, imo. We know that Jesus is a male. We also know that God created Adam first in His (masculine
tongue.gif
) image, then Eve came from Adam. In that case comes the superiority of man over woman. But man also doesn't have a right to over power and enslave (so to speak) women.
 

Red_Letters88

New Member
Jan 5, 2008
390
0
0
36
(koulourakia_girl;48190)
A while back I came across a really horrible, unbiblical doctrine, supposedly based on Scripture...it's that Man, and not Woman, was created in the Image of God.
Tell Paul hes wrong, then write your own bible.1 Corinthians 11:7-10:7A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. 8For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head.
 

RaddSpencer

New Member
Mar 28, 2008
285
0
0
44
(Red_Letters88;48431)
Tell Paul hes wrong, then write your own bible.1 Corinthians 11:7-10:7A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. 8For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head.
IDK man, I think you misread her quote. She is talking about a doctrine where women are not in God's image (They are in the image of man). According to Genesis, women are just as much in the image of God as men. Gen 1:26-28HOWEVER,Men and women represent different things to God. Men represent God (God's glory), and women represent mankind (mankind's glory). They are REPRESENTATIVES of two things, but that doesn't change their "image".
 

Red_Letters88

New Member
Jan 5, 2008
390
0
0
36
No Radd, I think I read it the correct way from her. I find that many many many females feel Pauls teachings should be changed- because it doesnt line up with todays society. Its not a matter of whos closer to God- its a matter of roles. Women were taken from man, for man. Not the other way around. Man is the IMAGe and glory of God, woman is the glory of man. Its a hard teaching for most females of our society to accept.
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
The problem here is that instead of really understanding what these verses mean we tend to read them with an assumption In every flesh body resides the true soul/spirit of the person the flesh means little the fact woman was made from man gives her a different role in the flesh notice I said differnt not less important her spirit/soul is the same value as a mans. Men were given certain attributes women others it is for this reason when they become one (as in marriage)they are whole. Man is supposed to be over woman but he is also supposed to conduct himself like Christ.
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
1 Corinthians 11:7-10:7A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. 8For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head.Now does anyone understand verse 10 ????
 

Red_Letters88

New Member
Jan 5, 2008
390
0
0
36
Right Kriss, I knew you were sneaking around here ready and waiting to pounce on me.
smile.gif
But like I said, its not "whos closer to God?" its- what roles has the Lord given the man and what has he given the woman. Theres reasons for all of it, but we should never act like womans souls are somehow less, as you may have taken my post. Thank the Lord for women, and their role with Gods picture, mankinds picture, and everything else they help us goofy guys with.
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
I actully agree with you Red but just wanted to make a point differnt doesnt mean less:)Dont tell the womans lib people I agree though:)Anyone got guess on verse 10 ???? before I tell you so you guys can argue with me:)
 

Red_Letters88

New Member
Jan 5, 2008
390
0
0
36
(kriss;48448)
I actully agree with you Red but just wanted to make a point differnt doesnt mean less:)Dont tell the womans lib people I agree though:)
Lol, btw Should we treat Hillary like a man?...that is, if she becomes president. .....you dont have to answer, I already know
 

Christina

New Member
Apr 10, 2006
10,885
101
0
15
I Corinthians 11:10 "For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels."It is for this reason that the woman ought to have the power, which is the authority of that God gives to each of us, when we are in Christ. This again is written to the end generation, and our power and authority come from the Word of God. That knowledge and wisdom that is in the Word of God is where our power comes from, and we must have that wisdom in our mind or we will not stand in the day of the deception. Now what about this Angel thing mentioned here in verse 10This goes way back to Genesis 6, and it pertains to what the angels did when they came to earth. It was for this reason that the flood of Noah came to be, for Satan could not destroy the Seed, so he tried to destroy the coming of Christ through Eve's daughters. Genesis 6:1 "And it came to pass, when the men began to multiply one the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,"So the subject that we are trying to learn is why does a woman today ever have to protect herself from angels? Got the subject here? Daughters are born to men.Genesis 6:2 "That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.""Sons of God" are the "Nephilim" or "fallen angels". They are the angels that have committed themselves to Satan in his fall in the first earth age. These fallen angels saw that the daughters of flesh men were very beautiful, and they wanted to take them for their wives. These fallen angels sought to have the things of flesh man, and their experiences of marriage, without being born of woman.