Search results

This is exactly what I mean in the denial of geology thread. The marine fossils (limestone) which make up most of the Hymilays are there because the sea bed has beeen forced upwards due to it being crushed between the India plate and the Eurasian plate. This process is ongoing and clear. The...

Then why is it that so many Christians deny the bleeding obvious that the Bible is factually incorrect in many instances?

As usual I also have no real idea what you are on about Raining. The Biblical description is definately water, sea water. A flood means a water flood unless otherwise specified. The notion of gas had yet to be in hunam parliance.

There has never been a world flood. There is no evidence of such an event. There is absolute evidence that it did not happen. Such an event would remodel every river valley in the world and deposit most of the world's soil into the oceans. It did not happen. Why ask detailed questions about...

Arnie Manitoba seems to think it is. OK, so you post a link to photos which you claim show evidence of a young earth creation. I then explain that they show exactly the opposite and you then refer to things which I cannot have a look at. Let's see this evidence which is incompatable with the...

^ Please keep it up. His taking the nice sweet non-confrontational option was a very significant step. He had to change the way he likes to think a lot to do that.

Yep, rock can bend without cracking if it's under enough pressure. It's the kind of thing that is examined in university labs. Have a closer look at photo 2. It shows a lot of layers of rock which have been folded and bent in the lower part of the cliff. These layers are of a sand stone (I...

Dodo David, Yep, that's what I think. I'm kind of positive about it as it will surely destroy the Christian religion but against the fact that it will continue to do damage in the process. The idea that the world is billions of years old was arrived at by geologists who started with...

^ I think it's important to try to engage him in a discussion which will "force" (maybe too strong a word) him to deal with ideas in a more reasoned way. It is our duty to our fellow man to not let him wander off mentally into madness.

I find that the God squad converters in the town centre who try to gather new recruits to Christianity have a basis of denying as much of science as possible. Is this a good way to promote the faith by denying obvious facts or will it cause faith to be regarded as just plain silly?

OK, how about commentating on the proficies of Christianity? What are they? What order are they profecised in and what order have they been fulfilled in so far? The other thread in this section may be the better place for that.

Yep, but as I am corraled in this section I am unable to post on the other threads so I try to reply here. I don't get any response. I am suprised by this. Most forums have those who enjoy a decent debate. Here this type seems lacking.

There seems a silance about actually discussing anything with non Christians. Why? Are you scared?

I have tried to read some of your posts but am unable to comprehend them. I am also not allowed to reply to them. You say you have been excluded from the ATS (whatever that is). Can you sumerise and explain your points here? Thanks.

Origonally posted by Select this in the Christian debate forum:- Sorry, I have not the slightest idea of the link between ideas of quantum(= extremely small) wave collapsing stuff and this. Can you explain a bit more directly? Thanks.

Erm.... Wot? How do you relate very deep rules of physics to higher emotions such as hope? (let alone charity!)