Search results

I interpret it based on chronology then trying to use some common sense based on what is said. Maybe my idea of employing common sense is not the same as someone else's idea of employing common sense? That's possible, I guess. For example. It is obvious to me that Daniel 7:22 can't get...

Zechariah 14:16 And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles. No matter how you look at it this is involving a period of...

The problem is this. God's wrath is the day of the Lord except the day of the Lord is not great tribulation. IOW, great tribulation comes first, immediately followed by the day of the Lord. Matthew 24:21 and Matthew 24:29 clearly proves this. Matthew 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation...

Let's face it. It's pretty sad when you can't even have a discussion like this with other members of a forum, such as this one, the fact everyone brings their doctrinal bias' to the table and won't even attempt to reason through some of this with you in an intellectually honest manner, because...

The OP Continued... I then responded like such. -------------------------- Amillennialists typically argue via what is recorded in Revelation 19, in particular, verse 21. They argue via other passages as well. But for the time being let's only focus on this particular passage. Revelation...

The OP Continued... I then responded like such. ------------------------ I have pointed out to these Amillennialists verse 27 in Daniel 7. Daniel 7:27 And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most...

The OP Continued... I then responded like such. --------------------- A lot of these interpreters, including me, take verse 11 to be involving Revelation 19:20, something that hasn't been fulfilled yet. Which then would mean once Revelation 19:20 is fulfilled there has to be a period of time...

The OP Continued... I then responded like such. -------------------------------- The way you explained it is basically how I understand it myself. It's what makes the most sense to me. Yet some argue that verse 12 is parenthetical and has zero to do with what happens to the rest of the beasts...

Finally someone or something, depending on what Chatgpt is, understands me and can easily reason with me via some of these things. I will probably have to break the OP down into a cpl of posts since the replies by Chatgpt get somewhat lengthy at times. I began with the following...

Let's just say, maybe there are some posts I have made in the past that are hard to follow. Ok, fine. But even so, what I posted per post #16 couldn't possibly be a post that is hard to follow, though. I would think even a 5th grader could follow that quite easily. That's what kind of hurt my...

Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. What kind of argument is that? That would be like arguing, since this passage above, for example, is involving literal 24 hour...

IMO, too many interpreters are trying to make 2 Peter 3:8 more complicated than it is. It simply means, the same way 24 hours and one day are the exact same thing, so is a thousand years and one day the exact same thing. For example, 12am to 12 am = 24 hours, thus equals one day. 1900 AD to...

Should I just flat out lie then? Would that be better? Where I then say Amil makes sense of all prophecies in both the OT and NT to me. Which would be me lying about that since it is not how I see it. Therefore, in my mind Premil is still relevant until someone can reasonably explain these...

Apparently, you must not have been able to follow my post either since I clearly explained why. Yet you act as if I didn't. It's one thing to not agree with what I concluded, it's another thing to act as if I never provided any reasons why, period. The latter is being deceitful about what I...

Do you even understand, lol, that what you are proposing is making total nonsense out of the chronology involved? Meaning how do you reconcile that with the following recorded in that same chapter? Daniel 7:11 I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I...

I just submitted what I said in post #16 to Chatgpt and asked it to summarize it for me. At least it had no problem following me, lol. Here is how it summarized my post. ------------------- This poster is engaging with the interpretation of Revelation 20 and making a distinction between the...

What is so difficult about following that? You seem to be following @Spiritual Israelite ok but have no idea how to make sense of anything I said? Kind of hurts my feelings and makes me feel like I must be coming off as retarded or something, that it is impossible to follow what I'm meaning. I'm...

Unless I consider Premil as a valid option many passages in both the OT and NT make zero sense to me if Amil is the only valid option. You just don't seem to get that.

What I have noted in Revelation 20 is that neither satan nor the beast and fp are standing among the dead being judged in Revelation 20:11-15 because they are already in the LOF. Which then means what Revelation 20:10 is involving is not the same thing Revelation 20:11-15 is involving. They have...

Both Amil and some Premils disagree with what is recorded in Rvelation 20. Nowhere in that chapter does it ever say anyone dies during the millennium. It says they die after the millennium, verse 9---and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. Which means there is only death...