Search results

TBH, that's not something I have noted being taught in the gospels or the epistles but can possibly be proved via OT prophecies, though. But then it requires logically deducing these things since it doesn't come right out and say that the rebellion per Revelation 20:7-9 is meant. An example...

Here, for one. Matthew 19:28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Luke 22:30 That ye may eat...

Now you need to prove it's meaning literal seas? But that aside, anyone that already agrees that Ezekiel 38 is involving the end of this age can't get around the fact that every wall falls to the ground. As if it makes sense that God does that then someone rebuilds everything soon after, meaning...

I happen to think, though I'm a Premil, and regardless most Premils disagree, the new Jerusalem is on the earth at the beginning of the millennium. It doesn't make sense it could be meaning the old Jerusalem if the following per Ezekiel 38 happens in the end of this age involving the 2nd coming...

The problem with that idea, even if one were Amil and takes satan's little season to be involving the end of this age, there is no resurrection event that occurs at the beginning of satan's little season. Therefore, there is no way for the rest of the dead to live again at the beginning of...

Let me guess. You need it to mean that so that you can make it be about 70 AD and Jerusalem being destroyed at the time, right?

Give us a ballpark amount as to how many weapons it involved at the time, then tell us what the point was in burning them for 7 years, if after 7 years weapons of that kind still existed and continued to exist indefinitely? In other posts you said it was pretty much a fairy tale to apply this to...

What are you meaning by this? Once again, you lost me.

That means you think weapons back then were burning for an entire 7 years then. That's not even reasonable in ancient times that there could be that many weapons to burn that it takes 7 years to burn them all. Which should then mean there are no more weapons of war, because if there still are...

You lost me. I don't know what you are meaning here?

Come on now, you can't be serious, no one is being deceptive about anything here, the point I am making is that A) proves that just because something doesn't happen until something previous is finished first, this doesn't have to mean once the previous event finishes, the next event immediately...

Awhile back I came across the following article and bookmarked it at the time. Wasn't for certain if could find it in my bookmarks after all this time, but after searching them I sure enough found it. The article isn't that lengthy and there could be some logic to what the author is proposing...

Actually, you are the one being absurd here. As if, after the millennium, the ones that are devoured by fire, these are meaning the saved rather than the unsaved. These people just don't come out of nowhere all of a sudden. If they are present after the millennium they are obviously also present...

That would mean the 7 years burning the weapons, the 7 months burying the dead, is meaning during the beginning of the millennium, right? If yes, that makes sense to me since there is this to consider---nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more(Isaiah...

A) But Trump served as President not again until his first term as President was finished. B) But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. Show us the difference between A) and B). Keeping in mind that per A) there is a 4 year gap between when his first...

Why can't any of that describe the past 2000 years beginning with what happened in 70 AD? Then close to the mid 20th century they have been brought out of the nations where they were dwelling, to then return to their homeland? What you probably take issue with, would be my guess, might be...

At that point He no longer would be hiding His face. Therefore, Ezekiel 37 must be meaning after God executes His judgment on Gog and his multitude, not before he does. If everything pertaining to Ezekiel 37 is already true before God executes His judgment on Gog and his multitude, it tends to...

Let's see if you might be correct. But it will be involving details that have to be taken into account first. Details are something that Amils like to tend to ignore a lot of the time. And don't try and deny it either. You know you and other Amils ignore details a lot of the time otherwise you...

If anything, everyone should already know that what is recorded in verse 24 can not occur until Revelation 20:11-15 has been fulfilled first. And everyone should already know that Revelation 20:11-15 can't be fulfilled in a single 24 hour day or less. Obviously then, verses 23-24 are compressed...

Let's look at some of the text again. Ezekiel 39:23 And the heathen shall know that the house of Israel went into captivity for their iniquity: because they trespassed against me, therefore hid I my face from them, and gave them into the hand of their enemies: so fell they all by the sword...