Search results

My argument proves Premil has to be true since NOSAS can't fit Revelation 20:6 if the first resurrection is being applied how Amils are applying it. You're the one arguing nonsense because you have John saying in Revelation 20:6 that some who have part in the first resurrection are not blessed...

Kind of lost focus for this thread though I started it. This is the first time I have been back to since I posted post #8. which was Wednesday and today is now Friday. Well almost Saturday now since it will be midnight here in about 45 minutes. This will also give you an idea how long it takes...

Let me guess. One of the numerous problems is that it would mean we have to take these sacrifices in the literal sense, that it will be involving animal sacrificing. If that is one of the numerous problems you see, that's not a good argument though since these sacrifices have to be applied to...

Maybe we are not entirely on the same page after all? Those that sit down in the kingdom of God will already be there and remain there. They are not required to come up from year to year, only those outside of the kingdom are required to do that. Keep in mind what Jesus said in 1 Thessalonians...

If it turns out that the thousand years are after the 2nd coming after all, does this mean that you will want no part in it, that you will refuse to have part in it? Which would mean you place your will and desires above that of God's. I'm just curious as to Amils thoughts on that since they are...

Now I think I see what you were meaning. Makes good sense to me since anyone living outside of the kingdom can't already be in the kingdom and already be there if they have to come up from year to year. Some will argue, it is ridiculous that everyone on the planet can be in the same city at the...

Revelation 15:1 And I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvellous, seven angels having the seven last plagues; for in them is filled up the wrath of God. 2 And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and...

They don't believe anyone does. Keeping in mind the beginning of their millennium is not the beginning of our millennium. Their millennium began 2000 years ago. Our millennium is yet to begin and won't begin until Christ returns first. Therefore, 2000 years ago there was not yet any beheaded...

Which comes first, for example? What is recorded in the days of Joshua or what is recorded in Ezekiel 37? What does the latter say. Ezekiel 37:21 And say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold , I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will...

Amils don't dispute that these are meaning mortals. But not mortals after the 2nd coming followed by after the thousand years, but mortals after the thousand years followed by the 2nd coming. Their dispute is with the millennium being after the 2nd coming. It would be different if they agreed...

You have never used Revelation 3:8 to support that God hates Jews like that, that they are all going to hell since they are synagogue of satan? To be fair then to you, provide your interpretation of that verse so it is clearly on record for all to see. Meaning that maybe I was misunderstanding...

When you say something like that are you basically meaning something like this? The thousand years are applying to this age and at the beginning of the thousand years the NHNE become accessible, but spiritually speaking, not literally speaking. Then at the end of the GWTJ the NHNE is then...

Spiritually speak, of course they do. But Revelation 21-22 is not still meaning spiritually speaking. BTW, my view is that the LOF is upon the earth and that it is visible during the thousand years. And it appears that maybe Isaiah 66:24 supports that since they appear to be doing that on the...

I'll get back to the rest of Isaiah 60 later, maybe. In the meantime, prove then how what Jesus said in Revelation 3:8, where that is obviously referring to Isaiah 60:14, how He fulfills that before He returns not after He returns? Meaning when Jesus said this---Behold, I will make them of the...

Isaiah 65:14 The sons also of them that afflicted thee shall come bending unto thee; and all they that despised thee shall bow themselves down at the soles of thy feet; and they shall call thee, The city of the LORD, The Zion of the Holy One of Israel. Revelation 3:9 Behold, I will make them of...

I don't know what sense to take Zechariah 14:16-19 in pertaining to this no rain unless they come up year to year. All I know is, that it is meaning after Zechariah 14:12 has been fulfilled. And the fact they can be punished for not complying implies a rebellion is possible eventually. Which is...

Evidence? Point out in the OP where there is evidence from both the OT and NT that support what the OP alleges. Point out in the OP where there is evidence that nothing in the OT contradicts what the OP alleges. There are least two sides to every story. The OP is being one sided. The OP is doing...

Continued from previous post. Then there is Zechariah 14 to factor in. Why do you think Zechariah lied to us about any of those events? You apparently think he lied when he told us that there will be people remaining of the nations that came against Jerusalem, and that they can be punished for...

I have to break this down into two posts, though. It got rather lengthy once I started typing these things up. In your opinion then, everything should be determined from the NT alone? No one should use both testaments together in order to try and determine anything? What you are doing is...

I guess I meant post # 16.. I guess I thought the 6 was an 8 or something when I glanced at the number of it.