Search results

I admit, what you bring up per the 7th trump does appear to be problematic for Premil. Not so much the 'there being time no more' part but the part about the mystery of God being finished. Can it be finished if there is still another 1000 years that follow? I don't know. I guess I need to think...

Excellent points you raised. Def worth looking into further.

We? You mean there is more than just you that argue against it? It's even worse than I imagined, because I already realized you argue against it. But I was kind of hoping you were the only person on the planet that did. That way there is only one person to try and convince they are wrong about...

Things I'm factoring in that you apparently are not, would be some of the following. For example, the animal kingdom. During the flood God preserved the animal kingdom. There was an ark built big enough to preserve them. How do you propose He preserves the animal kingdom this time around if you...

Exactly! And I don't see why some appear to argue against that. As if it makes sense that the kingdom remains in a hidden state forever.

Take death, for example. That would be something that is temporary and not forever. Meaning people don't keep dying forever. For example. It's a billion years later. No one is dying. It's a trillion years later. Still no one is dying. So on and so. I'm pretty sure I know the difference between...

FWIW, I understood you all along, in that regard. I have been around your type before and have been your type before. Nothing you said were fighting words. I get where you are coming from and why you said what you said. Some around here need to lighten up and not take everything so personal and...

Lately my thinking is this, right or wrong. IOW, maybe I'm right about some or all of this or maybe I'm not. It's what makes sense to me which might not make sense to someone else, though. It at least explains those in Matthew 16:28 if I'm on the right track here. Daniel 12:2 And many of them...

Matthew 16:28 Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. What if we factor this in? This has Christ being seen coming in His kingdom, right? But we can't look at that verse in isolation. We at least...

Except that's not the way it's going to happen, though. You are not factoring everything in that needs to be factored in. 1 Corinthians 15:28 is key. Christ obviously sets foot back on this earth before 1 Corinthians 15:28 is even fulfilled and Luke 19:27, for one, proves it. That verse is...

Has it ever crossed your mind that maybe no one is actually literally asking questions like that? IOW, maybe it's to be understood like the following, for example. Genesis 4:8 And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel...

What are you hoping to prove by these 3 questions? Don't Pretribbers think after everyone having met Jesus in the air, Jesus then does a u-turn and returns back to heaven? No matter which scenario you choose, whether Pretrib or Post trib, it involves a u-turn. If those who are alive and caught...

What I tend to think about the trumpets is that the 2Ws are maybe behind why those things are happening at the time. Note what the following says.. Revelation 11:6 These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood...

One issue I see with this, not that there is only one issue, I don't see it making sense that that time period could be in view. He was only gone a cpl of days. But before He leaves, He says this to His servants, meaning the following. Luke 19:13 And he called his ten servants, and delivered...

Why can't the dead in Christ explain them? After all, great tribulation precedes what is recorded in Revelation 19. Then look what the following records. Revelation 7:9 After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and...

While Im thinking about it since you are known to apply a lot of things to the first century that a lot of us apply to the end of this age and the second coming, what time period do you take it be involving in the parable once the nobleman has returned?

There is nothing for me to take the wrong way. I do not agree with some of these Amils to begin with, that we should take 2 Peter 3:10-12 in the literal sense where the planet is literally engulfed in flames. Some of them argue that since Noah's flood is mentioned in that chapter, and that that...

I wouldn't be so sure about that if I were you. Those currently occupying that region fit to a T someone God would still be hiding His face from. It is not until He executes His judgment on Gog and his multitude that He is then no longer hiding His face from them. Obviously, He is yet to execute...

Here's something to ponder if some of these Amils are correct that the entire planet is literally engulfed in flames once Christ returns. There won't be any animals to sacrifice. The entire animal kingdom will have been burned up, as in no more animals, period. I wonder why some of these Amils...

In your opinion then, the missing details pertaining to those coming out of their graves after Christ's resurrection aren't missing after all, they are found in Ezekiel 37? If so, I find that interesting though I don't interpret it like that myself. As to me, the way I interpret that chapter...