Search results

Its clear you don't understand the difference between mediator and intercessor. They are not synonymous. So youre wrong out of the gate. There is no ministerial priesthood in the new covenant. The priesthood of believers and Jesus' high priesthood. Thats it.

I have no problem with ecfs, but when they contradict scripture we go with the inspired word of God, not fallible men hundreds of years later. And yes, if you think murder is bad then we have no problem finding abortion as abhorrent in the bible. Plenty of verses to choose from. But if that...

We were trying to get her to admit something along those lines. I think she doesn't understand what that is.

Youre clearly saying you haven't found it yet, until illini. And she doesn't attend the rcc. Why is your search over if your church currently had what you just found? Clearly it doesn't. And on that i'd agree. There are numerous false, manmade contradictory doctrines and dogmas in the rcc. Keep...

Since you seem to like dictionaries, look up ekklesia in a lexicon. Give us the definition. There is no theory behind ekklesia = believers.

Jesus is head as has been posted. Of course Eph says we have been given apostles, prophets, pastors/teachers....to build up the body of Christ and edify the saints. Notice nowhere does Paul mention popes, cardinals or your 'infallible magesterium'? Along with pastors we also have; deacons...

The ekklesia = the body of believers is a theory? What book are you reading again?

I don't like the term for the reasons i described. I'm a christian.

So youre saying your church isn't, right? On this we agree. Why do you find it so incredulous that a statement of faith is based on scripture?

Thats the pot calling the kettle black. Catholics redefine words all the time to suit them prayer omnipotent mediator.....and others. Double standard much?? And i couldn't care less what others think a prot is. I know what i am, a christian.

If youre a born again believer in Jesus youre a christian. In 1517 protestant meant something vastly different than it does today. Today they (whomever they are) lumped anyone not a catholic into a this group called protestant. This includes mormons, jw's, oneness pentacostals and others who are...

Sorry, not true. We are christians. Who was the protestor in 1055 your church or the E.O.? If theres ever gonna be unity between your two 'one true churches' whose gonna blink and claim they were not led of the Holy Spirit?

Wow the blindness!! Read these posts again, with your eyes open.

We aren't talking about 1 Peter 3:15 are we? Youre quick to respond slow to hear. This is exactly what Calvin meant when talking about catholics having blind rage. You and a couple of other catholics here are poster children for that exact thing. When you want to talk rationally let me know.

Can't admit you misquoted the verse huh? Let's get past this first, it's been out there a while.

Not me. I asked you to open a Bible and compare with what you wrote. You obviously have no problem misquoting the Bible to suit your theology. That's what catholicism is but on.

What theory? You didn't cite the verse in it's entirety. And it makes a difference. That's fact, not a theory.

You should open a Bible and compare what it says with what you wrote.

Hahn publishes what i call bubble gum theology. Its simplistic at best. All one has to do to counter rc theology is simply say 'show me'. It all falls like a house of cards.

Huh?