Search results

PS, If you would like to be "making straight the way of the Lord", you can...by not participating in the partial scripture practices that are more like Satan's use of scripture than we ought to be doing. Reconcile all scripture and checking ourselves first with the test of reconciliation is...

There are soooo many would-be Christians who believe a line of scripture that cannot be reconciled with the rest of scripture by their interpretation. The result here on Christianity Board (although it is everywhere in the church and epidemic), is nearly endless arguing and defense using one...

OMG--you're jealous! Just jealous. Nonetheless, one of us is speaking to the very real and biblical mystery of God, and one of us is speaking against it. You are not fooling anyone--certainly not God.

The Oneness that is depicted in the overall word of God is that of "all in all", not of Three who agree and are only of the same mind. The greater depiction is that of One as "one flesh" and the omnipresence of God not being rationed to each, but rather One and the same as "a body of many...

Again you totally disregard the biblical fact that the entire word of God is revelations from God not revealed at once but in His timing, and as specifically ending with "the mystery of God" being finished. That is what is written. Yet you squirm and stomp your feet against the very idea...

The reason for this thread is that the above passage does not say "seated at the right hand of God", but refers to the right hand as being "the right hand of Him who sits on the throne" as evidence of their Oneness, that Oneness that Jesus had with the Father before the world was and as He...

The problem is...biblically there is no #2, etc. in the Oneness of God in which Jesus had before the world was, and now has again.

It is as I have been saying--your pet peeve is blinding you to the reality of God and His method of revealing Himself and "all truth" in the fulness of time; and it is these times in which Christ has appointed the Holy Spirit to lead us into "all truth." That is what is written. Even so, you are...

I am born again, yes. And yes I can understand God...but it is not that it is not what is written, but rather what is only seen spiritually. Nothing has been withheld in what is written, but all has not been revealed. A good example would be the mystery of marriage which was from the beginning...

Isaiah 54:2 “Enlarge the place of your tent, And let them stretch out the curtains of your dwellings; Do not spare; Lengthen your cords, And strengthen your stakes. Isaiah 26:15 You have increased the nation, O Lord, You have increased the nation; You are glorified.

It is seeing and hearing what is written with spiritual eyes and ears rather than worldly, literary, or academic eyes and ears. Which one does not have without having been born again of the spirit of God. This is exactly what Jesus was referring to when He told Peter how He would build His...

If you walk with the Lord--you are doing it right. However, it was and is you who is advocating for the idea that one must consider the Bible first as if it were His face. All I am pointing out (as did Paul who said the words "are spiritually discerned"), is that "all language" has been...

That is contrary to what the scriptures say...which is that God himself purposely confused all language in such a way that the scriptures must be spiritually discerned. I mean, at this late hour we should know better than to study to know the scriptures in the same way the Pharisees did, who...

It is not an assertion, it is a fact: God's method is revelation "precept upon precept, line upon line, here a little there a little" in "parable" "likeness" and "image" all ending in "the mystery of God" being revealed by spiritually being lead unto all truth. Which I say not to argue, not to...

That is the problem with relying primarily on language that has been confused (by God), rather than discerning the words spiritually. God being One does not exclude the reality that He also has many names and is present in many ways. If anything, Three is not enough.

The issue is "There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth", and that is not the result of my attitude, but Jesus's. But sure leaving it is certainly a choice--for a short time anyway.

The passage does not refer to Jesus as the right hand of the Father as a figure of speech--that's the point. It says rather, " in the right hand of Him who sat on the throne." In the right hand, means that it is One that is being spoken of, not two.

You are sooo in the dark about God's general methods that I need to take these one thing at a time. The entire word of God is a revelation of the mysteries of God. Apparently you do not know this. There are even mysteries that go unannounced for thousands of years and then a servant of God...

You said you have to take the Bible at face value. I said you can't, that it is spiritually discerned.

No, "God is spirit"--that's the point. You can't "take the bible at face value" as you said. It must be "spiritually discerned."